G
GeneralExecutor
In case there is a problem with the link above, here it is again:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX0GtdVQ26E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX0GtdVQ26E
I don't think you understand irony too well. But thanks, video was funny. I hope you use that link every time GE bangs on about the freeman rubbish.I hope you look at the above video I recommended for you. I'm trying to be as polite as possible.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Freeman_on_the_landAs Legal Week noted, "These ideas are most attractive to desperate, vulnerable people who are going through terrible times in their lives."[13] If someone is selling a simple explanation of why your life is messed up, the false hope it offers is extremely attractive — even if the explanation is complete rubbish and the suggested actions consistently just don't work.
Robert Menard in particular sells his DVD and book packs for C$250, but notably doesn't use freeman legal tactics himself[18] — he leaves that to his victims
Just look at the way the Syrian situation is being manipulated.
The Stratfor leaks back in 2012 PROVE their was a plan to create a false flag chemical attack to be blamed on Assad. But all we hear from the ABC and the BBC etc are the war drums pounding.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/assad-syria-is-a-sovereign-country-fighting-al-qaeda.html
http://www.drudgereport.com/
Thank god for the alternative media.
91% of the USA public are AGAINST any military action.
Pray for peace as the shit is flying.
GeneralExecutor, that makes it pretty much impossible to verify anything you are saying. How convenient. We just have to accept your particular version of reality. It also suggests to me that you are finding certain unrelated pieces of information and joining the dots, so to speak. This sort of thinking is quite paranoid!"They" have the ability to make CERTAIN that any form of unrebuttable proof which may destroy them is NOT available through mass media outlets, which include the net. If any such proof occasional would appear in the initial stage/s of an event, it is soon removed never to be seen or found again, and that, we have seen occur numerous times over the last decade just on the net. It boils down to what one is able to discern by disseminating what is allowed to be there.
What you ask for is a form of proof whereby once having acquired such proof THEIR entire game could be destroyed overnight. We think they would NEVER allow such thing to exist publicly, but then again, what would we know?
[FONT="]Common and General laws are today's foundational laws and in usage in all of H.M. Commonwealth for those capable/competent enough to invoke and verbally enforce them.
Even Uniform Commercial Code permits one the right to common law protection through UCC 1-308 because it is through clever/sinister manipulation of common and civil law that they used to create UCC to intertwine/enjoin all with Admiralty. As there is a MAXIM of law which implies that the "created" CANNOT be greater than its CREATOR, then to remain in honor, they MUST allow for the invocation of common law whilst within UCC or without; hence 1-308 is the remedy to the controversy they raised/created.
[/FONT]