..... not because it has the best environment for growing.
Hello all,
Huh?
minds_I
..... not because it has the best environment for growing.
where u spend your money
......................... is up to you.
Brain, my sense is that people in Humboldt began using greenies for two reasons, and neither is that greenhouses produce better herb: 1) security against aerial detection; 2) protection from damp coastal fall weather.
While you may be able to make an argument that ghs can produce better herb, I don't think the hills of Humboldt will be where much legal herb is produced. People went there to grow because it's remote and has convoluted topography, not because it has the best environment for growing.
Places that might be consistently good for growing in the West include Eastern Washington and parts of the foothills east of the Sacramento Valley: lots of sunshine, pretty dry. There, outdoor growing can be done without major investments in climate control.
Agreed, but I think what will dictate the market is what the masses spend their money on. Mareketing will be king in this emerging industry where very few have a real understanding of the plant.
If a 500million dollar ad campaign says that Sativa's are the new kid on the block recreationally and that we have all been heavily sedated on indica's all this time and it's time to change, I am sure that the pop songs would be about haze instead of kush. Who cares if it true if that what people are being told; a lot of them buy into it.