What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

The Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012

Herborizer

Active member
Veteran
From: regulatemarijuanalikewine.com

Judge gray will be presenting to the attorney general tomorrow.



The People of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012


SECTION 1.* Findings, Declarations, Purpose, Directives, and Orders

New Section 11362.95 is added to the Health and Safety Code:

11362.95. This section shall be known as and may be cited as the "Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012," known hereinafter as the "Act."

(a) The People of the State of California hereby find and declare:

(1) Outlawing marijuana has not reduced its availability and has actually resulted in making it easier for minors to acquire.

(2) Marijuana is an untapped revenue source for the State of California, and that the best way to tap into that source for the benefit of all Californians is to tax and regulate it.

(3) The regulation of marijuana will benefit the People of the State of California by reducing criminal gang activity, promoting agriculture, creating jobs by creating a new hemp industry in the State of California, and reduce the fiscal and overpopulation burdens on the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

(b) The purposes of this Act are as follows:

(1) To amend the California Health and Safety Code sections 11357, 11358, 11359, 11360(a), 11366, 11366.5, and (b), 11485, and Vehicle Code section 23222(b), such that persons 21 years of age or older shall no longer be prohibited from the use, possession, trade, gifting, sales, distribution, storage, transportation, production, or cultivation of marijuana.

(2) Marijuana, THC, and CBD explicitly and/or by inference, shall be removed from Health and Safety Code section 11054, except for those statutes pertaining to:

(A) Operating a motor vehicle;

(B) Using marijuana or being impaired in the workplace or public nonsmoking areas.

(C) Providing, transferring, or selling marijuana to a person under 21 years of age; and

(D) The use, possession, cultivation, processing, sales, distribution, transporting, or storing on premises of marijuana by persons under 21 years of age.

(3) The amendment of statutes that criminalize the use, possession, cultivation, processing, transportation, storage, distribution, gifting and/or selling of marijuana in any form, or method of ingestion by persons 21 years of age or older, to legalize all such for-profit or non-profit activity by those persons, groups, or by approved business entities, and does not subject these persons/entities to search, arrest, prosecution, seizure, asset forfeiture, and/or any criminal or civil penalty or sanction.

(4) That these enumerated activities are not punishable herein.

(5) That all pending court actions under said amended statutes that conflict with the provisions of this Act shall be dismissed with prejudice.

(c) The People of the State of California hereby declare that this Act expressly prohibits the following:

(1) The search, arrest, prosecution, seizure of marijuana, asset forfeiture, or imposition of any criminal or civil penalties or fines for persons 21 years of age or older or entities for acting within the provisions of this Act.* Without limiting any other greater immunity or rights granted herein, these persons/entities are also granted the immunity specified in Health and Safety Code section 11367, subject to its provisions.

(2) Any and all commercial advertising of the sales, distribution, and use of marijuana, except for medical marijuana and products that contain less than one percent THC. This provision shall be enforced hereafter by penalties to be set forth by the Legislature.

(d) The People of the State of California hereby expressly declare that this Act does not repeal, modify, or change any present medical marijuana statutes as set forth in California Proposition 215 and its progeny.

(e) The People of the State of California hereby declare:

(1) This Act adopts the definitions of marijuana and THC as they are presently set forth in Health and Safety Code Sections 11018 and 11006.5, but those definitions shall be broadly interpreted to include the species Cannabis Indica, Ruderalis, and Americana, as well as any plant part, derivative, interspecies hybrids or cross-breeds, and all non-genetically-modified strains of the Cannabis genus and plant.

(2) Existing taxes and regulations for the establishment of the farming, industry, distribution, retail sales, and wholesale transactions of agricultural crops and products shall apply to marijuana, regardless of THC level, using the grape winery industry as a model, so long as the results support these declarations, purposes and goals.

(3) All marijuana or hemp products with a THC level below one percent, shall be authorized for normal retail sales.* All marijuana or hemp products with a THC level of one percent or above shall be restricted for normal retail sales to persons 21 years of age or older and carefully regulated in a manner similar to wine, so long as the results support these declarations, purposes and goals.

(4) The State of California, and all branches of its government, shall liberally construe the meaning and implementation of this Act to favor and benefit individuals, and qualifying business entities regarding the following:

(A) No taxes, fees, laws, rules, regulations, or local city or county zoning requirements may be adopted or enacted to defeat, deny, or prohibit the purposes of this Act, or to defeat, deny, or prohibit these persons 21 years of age or older, associations, commercial, agricultural, or industrial businesses from engaging in the activities protected by this Act, and all civil rights apply as set forth in Civil Code Sections 52.1 et seq., 54, Food and Agricultural Code Sections 54033 through 54035, inclusive.

(B) As per the winery regulations of the alcohol industry model that allow for non-commercial home brewing, any person, association, or collective group not producing more than 25 flowering plants or 12 pounds of dried processed marijuana per adult, per year, shall be exempt from any winery regulations of the alcohol industry model, excises, fees, and taxes, except for income taxes and sales taxes, if they apply.

(C) No regulations, taxes, or fees shall be enacted or imposed for marijuana for qualifying persons and entities, which are more severe or restrictive than those for comparable and reasonable usage in the commercial wine grape farming and winery regulations of the alcohol industry model, including for farming, planting, cultivating, irrigating, harvesting, processing, brokering, storing, selling, distributing, and establishing of cooperatives or collective associations.

(5) Regardless of jurisdictional arguments, all state, local, elected, appointed, hired employees, officers, and officials shall refuse to and shall not cooperate with or assist federal, state, or local officials or employees who would eradicate marijuana, act for seizure or forfeiture, or defeat any liberally construed purpose of this Act, or to operate under any contract or arrangement to repeal or circumvent this Act directly or indirectly, or to follow or to abide by any federal laws or regulations that are in conflict with this Act.* Further, no such person acting alone, or with any other person or legislative or executive body, may contract or agree to cooperate with or to assist federal officials, employees, agencies or departments to obtain any money, property, gain, or advantage by the arrest, prosecution, conviction, or deprivation or seizure of property of anyone acting within the age provisions of this Act.

(6) Within 30 days of passage of this Act, the offices of both the state Attorney General and the Department of Public Health shall inform the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Attorney General, Congress, Drug Enforcement Agency and Food and Drug Administration that in 1996 California recognized the current medical use of marijuana in treatment in the United States, and since 1996, and is a state-regulated medical practice. Physicians have evaluated thousands of patients' use which has had no adverse consequences, and for that reason demand or petition as is appropriate (see 21 CFR 1308.43, 21 USC 811-812) that marijuana and tetrahydrocannabinols as defined in 21 USC 802(16) be removed from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 USC 800 et. seq., where it is currently listed as a drug with no accepted medical use.

(7) The State of California is ordered to protect and defend all provisions of this Act from any and all challenges or litigation, whether from individuals, officials, cities, counties, the state or federal governments.

(f) In order to protect the public health and safety, the People of the State of California hereby require the state Department of Health to deputize persons who are 21 years of age or older and apply as unpaid, unarmed, volunteer peace officers, hereinafter known as Harm Reduction Officers (HROs), who are required to compel implementation and enforce all provisions of this Act.

(1) These persons, upon registration and payment of a nonrefundable training and materials fee, not to exceed $200, must complete a minimum of two days training in the following curriculum areas:

(A) State and federal Cannabis laws and regulations;

(B) Indoor and outdoor cultivation hazards and safe practices;

(C) Applicable fire, building, environmental, labor, and safety codes; and

(D) The state and federal Bills of Rights and appropriate civil rights, including 18 USC §241 and 242 and Civil Code Sections 52.1 et seq., and 54.

(2) Training shall be privately contracted.* Training shall be repeated by HROs every three years, and curriculum updates shall be provided to HROs annually.

(3) Upon completion of training, a certificate of completion shall be issued to the trainee, who may then take the certificate to any state Department of Health office, law enforcement agency, or to any Superior Court judge, where they shall be deputized as Department of Health peace officers and shall take the oath of office as specified in Article XX, Section 3 of the California Constitution.* Upon payment of the processing fee to the Health Department, not to exceed $100, a HRO shall be issued a photo identification card, identical throughout the state.

(4) The HROs shall be charged with the duty of compelling persons to comply with this Act by informing persons of compliance requirements or perceived violations, and reporting actual uncorrected violations to law enforcement for follow-up action.

(5) By their status of being peace officers, HROs shall be considered to be in full compliance with both 21 USC §885(d) and Health and Safety Code section 11367, and therefore shall be immune from all state and federal liability and prosecution only for enforcing and operating under the provisions of this Act.

(6) The training and certification requirements of this paragraph shall be applicable only to HROs, and the provisions of Penal Code sections 832 et seq. shall not apply to HROs or to this paragraph.

(g) This Act shall become effective immediately upon passage.

SECTION 2.* Severability

If any of the provisions of this Act, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions shall not be affected, but shall remain in full force and effect, and to this end the provisions of this Act are severable.

SECTION 3.* Conflicting Measures

If this Act is approved by the voters but superseded by law by any other conflicting ballot measure approved by the voters at the same election, and the conflicting measures are later held invalid, this Act shall be self-executing and given the full force of law.
 

Hash Zeppelin

Ski Bum Rodeo Clown
Premium user
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I like these part the most

No taxes, fees, laws, rules, regulations, or local city or county zoning requirements may be adopted or enacted to defeat, deny, or prohibit the purposes of this Act, or to defeat, deny, or prohibit these persons 21 years of age or older, associations, commercial, agricultural, or industrial businesses from engaging in the activities protected by this Act, and all civil rights apply as set forth in Civil Code Sections 52.1 et seq., 54, Food and Agricultural Code Sections 54033 through 54035, inclusive.

(5) Regardless of jurisdictional arguments, all state, local, elected, appointed, hired employees, officers, and officials shall refuse to and shall not cooperate with or assist federal, state, or local officials or employees who would eradicate marijuana, act for seizure or forfeiture, or defeat any liberally construed purpose of this Act, or to operate under any contract or arrangement to repeal or circumvent this Act directly or indirectly, or to follow or to abide by any federal laws or regulations that are in conflict with this Act.* Further, no such person acting alone, or with any other person or legislative or executive body, may contract or agree to cooperate with or to assist federal officials, employees, agencies or departments to obtain any money, property, gain, or advantage by the arrest, prosecution, conviction, or deprivation or seizure of property of anyone acting within the age provisions of this Act.

(7) The State of California is ordered to protect and defend all provisions of this Act from any and all challenges or litigation, whether from individuals, officials, cities, counties, the state or federal governments.

SECTION 2.* Severability

If any of the provisions of this Act, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions shall not be affected, but shall remain in full force and effect, and to this end the provisions of this Act are severable.

SECTION 3.* Conflicting Measures

If this Act is approved by the voters but superseded by law by any other conflicting ballot measure approved by the voters at the same election, and the conflicting measures are later held invalid, this Act shall be self-executing and given the full force of law
.
 

vta

Active member
Veteran
Not to sure about this one. We all would be non-compliant. 12 plants a year total??

"(B) As per the winery regulations of the alcohol industry model that allow for non-commercial home brewing, any person, association, or collective group not producing more than 25 flowering plants or 12 pounds of dried processed marijuana per adult, per year, shall be exempt from any winery regulations of the alcohol industry model, excises, fees, and taxes, except for income taxes and sales taxes, if they apply."


This is where cities can make money...zip ties anyone?
 
G

guest8905

its not legalization at all, its regulation.....not sure ill ever be down for regs. Freee up da herbs
 
G

Ganja D

Not to sure about this one. We all would be non-compliant. 12 plants a year total??

"(B) As per the winery regulations of the alcohol industry model that allow for non-commercial home brewing, any person, association, or collective group not producing more than 25 flowering plants or 12 pounds of dried processed marijuana per adult, per year, shall be exempt from any winery regulations of the alcohol industry model, excises, fees, and taxes, except for income taxes and sales taxes, if they apply."


This is where cities can make money...zip ties anyone?

Thats just for non commercial growers. It says if your not growing 25 flowering plants or producing 12 pounds a year your exempt from taxes of growing.
This sounds way too good to be true. If it's real it looks very very very good.
 
G

Ganja D

its not legalization at all, its regulation.....not sure ill ever be down for regs. Freee up da herbs

It looks pretty good to me. I just read the whole thing. It would actually force the Ca attorney general to confront the Federal government about MJ being a useful drug.

Read the whole thing Stickky,this sounds amazing.
 

Hydrosun

I love my life
Veteran
Not to sure about this one. We all would be non-compliant. 12 plants a year total??

"(B) As per the winery regulations of the alcohol industry model that allow for non-commercial home brewing, any person, association, or collective group not producing more than 25 flowering plants or 12 pounds of dried processed marijuana per adult, per year, shall be exempt from any winery regulations of the alcohol industry model, excises, fees, and taxes, except for income taxes and sales taxes, if they apply."


This is where cities can make money...zip ties anyone?

12lbs per year per adult is not that restrictive, this is a million times better than prop 19.

:joint:
 
G

Ganja D

12lbs per year per adult is not that restrictive, this is a million times better than prop 19.

:joint:

You guys are failing to understand that part. It says you can grow pretty much anything you want. If you grow less than 25 flowering plants or less that 12 pounds a year your exempt from paying normal Wine industry standard taxes.
It looks as if it gives anyone the right to grow what they want. It seems to really protect us.
I would love to hear to story of who put this together. I'm not the best with interpreting laws but Bravo!
 

hazy

Active member
Veteran
Now if the press will print positive mmj stories, maybe some voters attitudes can be changed.
 

Esrar

Member
You guys are failing to understand that part. It says you can grow pretty much anything you want. If you grow less than 25 flowering plants or less that 12 pounds a year your exempt from paying normal Wine industry standard taxes.
It looks as if it gives anyone the right to grow what they want. It seems to really protect us.
I would love to hear to story of who put this together. I'm not the best with interpreting laws but Bravo!

Thats my interpretation also. Its the most rational proposal i have read so far.
 

Rednick

One day you will have to answer to the children of
Veteran
Not to sure about this one.

"(B) As per the winery regulations of the alcohol industry model that allow for non-commercial home brewing, any person, association, or collective group not producing more than 25 flowering plants or 12 pounds of dried processed marijuana per adult, per year, shall be exempt from any winery regulations of the alcohol industry model, excises, fees, and taxes, except for income taxes and sales taxes, if they apply."
That sounds like the law saying, "Get off yer ass hippie and grow #s!".

Penalties for NOT growing more is all that is missing. Lazy growers will still be able to hide behind their 'medical defense'.
:blowbubbles:
 

Herborizer

Active member
Veteran
Official website: http://www.regulatemarijuanalikewine.com

SPONSORED BY THE REGULATE MARIJUANA LIKE WINE COMMITTEE
JAMES P. GRAY, CHIEF PROPONENT Retired Superior Court Judge and author
STEVE KUBBY, CHIEF OFFICER Managing Partner and CEO, Kubby Patents and Licenses
WILLIAM McPIKE,* COUNSEL* Nationally recognized attorney and legal authority
STEVE COLLETT, TREASURER President, Collett & Company, Inc., Certified Public Accountants

Retired Judge Gray has been a huge supporter of legalization.
 

vta

Active member
Veteran
You can grow 25 plants per year....total. I have twice that in flower now. I guess for some it would be fine but not for perpetual growers.

Don't get me wrong...I like it for the most part, as I posted about this last month. I just feel that 25 plants a year is a little weak....BUT I"LL TAKE IT!!
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top