Baba; I don't mind learning that H2O2 can probably (I say probably because I check most things in my lab and have actually disproven some dearly held myths) neutralize chloramines. You have failed to address the microscopic observations presented by Mad. I have stated that spring or well water is superior, that RO water does not neutralize chloramines and that the best thing is to use what one has and if necessary de-chlorinate/de-chloraminate with molasses, ascorbic acid, acetic acid or organic matter. You did not even address this! What do you recommend people do? Add H2O2 to an already toxic microbe killing mix? H2O2 kills catalase negative bacteria/archaea and many protozoa. Those which survive may have some interesting messenger RNA.
I do not understand your need to be vulgar. We have not been vulgar to you with the exception of Mad's 'dick'. In the latter part of this thread we've tried addressing whatever it is you are suggesting. Just...what is it?
Really, I could give a ripe rats toss about what you provided concering RO water, blah blah blah. And I discount each and everything I get now from Mad. He isn't about much. That is apparent. Although the way he touted you was almost if he actually knows you and actually knows anything about you. Of course I am sure he's knows squat there too.
In any event, I challenge you to prove your claim that we can rid our water of any danger or chlorAmine (get a better grip mad and practice grammar and spelling with your boyfriends -this is a canna board) simply my adding two drops of it to a gallon of water, whatever a drop is. Apparently what I said about the size of a drop means nothing to you scientists either.
More common sense on that as well, aye? Surely the clear thinking person can figure out just what a drop of something that is thick as molasses is....
(scientists my ass)
And yes, mad was vulgar and rude from the start of his exchange with me. If you didn't see that then again, I give a ripe rats toss.
I suggest that each and every item that either of you bring, you bring it with something to back it up....something perhaps a bit more credible than saying a couple of colleagues checked it out with some pool strips, or that mad has made some sort of microscopic study.
Bullshit and bollocks.
And JJ...I don't know where you have been, but you are going to tell me that you don't see any problems with the substance?
I think I have seen on multiple boards through the years where folks finally narrowed their growing problems down to the fact the their municipality had went to chloramines instead of free chlorine for disinfecting the water. Chlorine is easy to get rid of, chloramines are not. And these clowns are claiming that it is as simple as adding two drops of molasses is all that is needed to neutralize the chloramines.
Now, I ask you....if it were that simple...say as simple as adding an orange peel..which is simple due to the ascorbic acid content of the juice. But you will never see any mention of simply using a simple organic material to do the work. Never any mention by anyone, other than these rude clowns and their alleged laboratories.
One would think their claim would be a bit more widely accepted...or even talked about in debate? Nothing, zip, nada...save for from this scientific lot.
This was the start of mad's bullshit...unprovoked bullshit btw.
OK, he's punishing me and making me wait because I was cocky, annoying, and ignorant.this was tested by Microbeman, one of our most respected members here. Had you not been cocky and annoying about your own ignorance, the link to the thread would be here. Now you have to wait until someone else asks.
Is this the part where he wasn't vulgar? Or do we need to cuss before we are considered vulgar? To hell with that.
Ah and so now, again without provocation, I'm a dick.I also would take the time, had you not been a dick, to explain that chlorine/chloramine are oxidizers, and anything organic in their path will react. That includes reducing sugars in molasses.
But I wasn't a dick..and the info I provided proved out to be correct...or at least correct in the eyes of others that seem to publish such things on the internet in studies...we need to wait for confirmation from you lab I suppose? To hell with that too.
What I typed was shown to be CORRECT and was only seen by condescending by mad. It wasn't meant to be, nor could it even remotely been taken as such.The underlined portion is an example of condescending
by the way, I criticized your comments, but I haven't called you a name. I don't know you, just what you'v written, which is wrong and condescending.
Accept perhaps by those who have comprehension problems and bad attitudes.
And this is real rich..
Here this guy is patting himself on the back for his obvious hard work, and demanding respect. Double inseminate that....respect gets earned, not demanded.this is for the rest of you watching this. don't condescend to people who are here to help. and know your shit before you tell someone who has worked on it harder than you the they are full of it. Some of us go to great lengths to get real knowledge from outside the cannabis echo chamber and bring it back to the community. We deserve respect.
His hard work amounts to buying off on an internet post and running with it as if. Not much more.
Is this the microscopic study that I should comment on, Microbe? He has checked it out with a miscroscope...My experience is also practical. Having made many many brews of ACT and having checked many of those with a microscope, I am completely confident that a bit of molasses will neutralize all chlorine. A pinch of compost does it even faster.
Good grief. I don't even know how to keep from laughing so I can add anything to that...good grief. He has added nothing, and he probably didn't even do what he is claiming. Perhaps if someone wants to make such claims they would explain the procedure and the controls used? No, there was no microscopic study done.
No wonder bad rep was given out. Here we have a person demanding respect from us for the hard work he puts out...when he is posting up bullshit and speculation as fact.wow I have never gotten so much bad rep for posting so much good info.
I mean, it is surely apparent that either his comprehension skills or his integrity one of the two are in question, when he claimed that Microbeman conducted the study in question. He did not, and has nothing he can give us about the actual study..if there indeed was one and I believe that even that claim is indeed bogus. Even without knowing the controls claimed, he mentioned they used test strips. I won't even go further because test strips for a scientific study is like using your reading glasses to check trics.
Just what assertions has he backed up? He has had to reverse a couple of his assertions in a very short time, but I have seen him back up squat shit.you have backed up your assertions how? By whining about non-existent name calling. i told you to stop being a dick. You can stop at any time, so it's not a name. Your ignorance is also only a temporary condition, like the flu. And just like the flu, it can cause you do get a little runny.
What I do see, is in between his smart ass comments and jabs, he inserts bullshit like this...
Now, wasn't he shown to be full of shit on this one? Sure he was...oh wait, not until Microbeman confirms it in his lab.You have repeated the often repeated but still flat out senseless assertion that h2o2 will neutralize chlorine. That alone disqualifies you as a source.
LOL,,,
again, to hell with that and damn your trying to make me look like the bad guy here.
I think we have seen just what is what in here.
Or perhaps I have it all wrong, and am only imagining these things?
Last edited: