Chefboy.....Well, since my name got mentioned...and not at all in a good way by you....a rather bold call out....perhaps I should take a moment of my time to attempt to enlighten you. I'm probably wasting my keystrokes...but I've a few minutes to entertain you.
Cinderella99 (original genetics created by Bros. Grimm) (a cubed version of Princess) has not been available from Bros. Grimm since they dissolved the co and went their separate ways. DGS was commissioned by Gypsy to return C99 to his private line-up...and DGS obliged by selecting parent stock from original Bros. Grimm seeds...this is the closest those who wish to have C99 in their garden can get, sans the very few people who might have stashed a pack or two from the original Bros Grimm release from over 7 years ago. So if what I did with C99 is considered watering it down by you....then you need to study up on marijuana botany.
I've had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Soul...and he's had the pleasure of toking on some C99 grown by me, with him giving his approval to the C99 genetics I originally started in 2003 as being representative of his and Sly's original creation....iow...proper selections were made that originated from their seeds.
DGS is soon to release DTC99 f2 for the same reason.....it's not available and has not been available from Bros. Grimm for about the same length of time as C99. DTC99 f2 is the first step being taken in a DTC99 preservation project by DGS.
Merlin's Magic I created from an unworked Acapulco Gold line from seeds obtained in Mexico....and I've made some interesting F1 hybrids along the way too...so if you think your opinion here literally taking a shite on me actually bothers me...it doesn't....but your lack of botanical knowledge is rather amusing.
When you have 4 yrs of college botany and horticultural science behind you, and have bothered to read Marijuana Botany a few times, I'll be happy to debate how utterly silly your first post is...until then, it's just an opinion from someone with less than a full understanding of the intricacies of genetics. Maybe you think Punnet Square is a place in Idaho?
In all seriousness, what I...or any breeder...does will never please everyone all of the time. Perhaps that's one reason why there are so many interesting flavors and improved combinations available today.
Please don't read what about to say the wrong way, cause some people could.
I don't agree with calling out peoples names; its very rude and unprofessional.
I think I understand what Chef is trying to say. Some breeders will use genetics that are extremely popular, while other breeders will make genetics popular. Neither is worse or better then the other IMHO. From his point of view (I think), he sees the breeder who uses popular genetics as "watering-down" those genetics and making them less from their original state.
I see "watering-down"... can we use a different term? Its so derogatory. How about evolving?
I see evolving genetics from a good point of view and conditionally bad point of view. Generally, its good. We see evolved strains that have some of the great characteristics of the past, with new traits to accentuate and enhance those old flavors. The conditionally bad thing is: when a breeder stops making a favorite and the only thing that is left is crosses, we lose something forever.
Again, no judgments. I just want to attempt to bring some clarity to both sides.
Also, I'm no breeder and definitely not an expert, but I have read "The Cannabis Breeder's Bible: The Definitive Guide to Marijuana Genetics, Cannabis Botany and Creating Strains for the Seed Market". I liked it and learned a lot.