What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

The Chem family

simos

Member
Pics are fine now, Nomaad, no idea what my problem was. 65 sounds like a good timeframe to aim for. I think people get confused and take it to 80 because they're expecting to see orange/brown pistils and it doesn't feel done to them until they show up. It's been my experience that when the trichs are mostly amber the pistils are mostly still a silvery color...
 

nomaad

Active member
Veteran
One characteristic to my ChemD is that the pistils are pink when they first come out... Has anybody else seen this with the D cut?
 
I've grown the 91 and D. From my experience, the 91 exhibited more Sativa characteristics in the area of growth pattern, bud formation and buzz. The aroma reminded me of EastCoastSourD. The 91 is a producer and I usually chopped her down within the 9-10 week range.

The D displayed characteristics that were more Indica(ish), in that the buds were more dense than the 91, and the "buzz" was more of a stone compared to the Sativa speedybuzzy high of the 91. The D is a "yielder" as well and was usually chopped around the same time frame as the 91. I don't remember the aroma of the D, but I recall that it was quite different from the 91.

Two different phenotypes for sure.
 

MOneYMiKe

Patriot Father 2a Defender /Breeder
Veteran
i would beg to differ.......91,chemd,chem3
picture.php



91,d,3....
picture.php



hope this help's the confusion.....seing theres allot of it going around.......late

funny thou this one is a family member.....and im still thinking she is better than the rest.....maby.........
picture.php
 
Last edited:
Beg to differ what specifically? Can you give a description of all three? Smell, flavor, stone/buzz effects. Also, how does the density of the bud compare?

When I grew the 91 the buds were not really dense, but not airy either, whereas the D's buds were more dense and produced a more Indica body stone.
 
Last edited:

subrob

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
soooo...whats the deal on the d?...theres a couple cuts floating in the med scene here in san diego...one, has the (here we go) mosaic virus (not tobacco, but one of em)..this i know to be a legit cut as it went from chemdogs hand to my source to me..the second cut around here many of us call chemdawg...its vended at all the clubs as chemd but is, without question, a diff cut...so i know there are folks in this thread from all over...whos got the gnarly twisted discolored cut like i have?(that kicks the shit outta almost anything i put against it)
---as far as chem 4...i was not a fan for awhile...had a few diff samples, all poorly grown, except one, that was just premature(i aint hating b..haha)...then a bro brought me the finest sample ive seen in person to date and i immediately liked it! the flavor, for me, is sooo much nicer than the d...but juuuust a step below in the stoned out dept(not always a bad thing)
 

subrob

Well-known member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
im such a pic whore...ive posted this second nug shot of chem about 10 times on 10 diff threads:)...but it rocks...
picture.php

picture.php
 

englishrick

Plumber/Builder
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
yeh sub,,,thats badass

ive still not tryed the D,,,but i will sooner or later

subrob said:
whos got the gnarly twisted discolored cut like i have?(that kicks the shit outta almost anything i put against it)
 

nomaad

Active member
Veteran
beautiful sample, sub. I just took mine down at 60 days... a little early, I know, but the color of the trichs was just right. Almost everything seems to finish a bit early in the light dep. I'll take some shots of her on the line.
 

simos

Member
Aren't Chem '91 and Chemdog D the same thing?

No, they aren't. The '91 Skunk VA cut is a more OGish pheno. The D has sharper serration and a slightly different leaf shape.

To really pin down the flavor/smell/buzz differences I'd have to have well-grown samples of both in hand - it's been a while.
 

englishrick

Plumber/Builder
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
yo fresh,,,,the ECSD is supposed to be MassSuperskunk x [Chem x DNL],,,,,i relized this years ago,,,,,ECSD was 1 of the first majorly hyped and available clones,,,an guess what,,,it probbly came from feminized seeds,,,,

did you ever hear of the FFA clone,,,MassSuperskunk x OGKA rez made selected by crazycomposer....ive got the FFA clone and its pretty nice too,,,its from feminized seed again,,,the FFA stands strong with the most hyped clones in the world,,,hightimes ran a 2 page artical on it

id bet money that the whole Chem family is riding on the back of feminization,,,thats why its been so good,,

Chem91 was supposed to have been found in a bag of weed,,,,sounds like fems to me,,[if the weed was indoor and grown for sensi]
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top