maybe A- actualy ,,,
I am an A pheno, and have had numerous energetic encounters with like A pheno's. It's life for A group.
The B group may not relate. (shrug)
no he was saying cloning unhealthy branches leads to unhealthy plants with more unhealthy branches being cloned. Stressful conditions over time can trigger heritable epigenetic changes.
I'm still saying the same thing I was saying in that thread... the slamming, I think was a result of your persistently carrying the concept beyond it's realities. Healthy branches make healthy clones in perpetuity... Continuing to take cuts from cuts of cuts which were all less than healthy can cause problems that are very time consuming and tedious to correct.
Poor selection in maintaining a seedline is an entirely different issue. I was talking Clones
^^i would love him to but since that long pissing match with vXv i think Tom is reluctant to enter into dicutions like this,,,,peeps just direct there neggativity at his PureLines,,,,,,,beffore all that happend tom was happy to put his kneck out,,,,i hope hes not worried about sombody else trying to chop his head off,,,,,Tom is 1 of the best!!,,,hes the 1 who introduced me to Allard
Nothing in the real world which indicates that would be the case.
I am familiar with all of that, and still stand by my statement 100%. I did not say noting indicates that it is possible, I said nothing indicates it is the case.
It is not impossible, but it has never been shown to work like you imagine it to, and contradictory mechanisms of inheritance have been observed. Lamarck, soft inheritance and Lamarckism was debunked mid 1800s.
When most biologists hear the name Lamarck or the term soft inheritance, the reaction is, 'Oh my God, here we go again'," Richards says. "But from a molecular biology point of view there is a mechanism to do soft inheritance, and epigenetic inheritance can be construed as a form of soft inheritance. That's all I'm saying.
The really heretical thing to say is that the environment could be pushing the epigenetic information in a direction that is beneficial. This is the more extreme variation of soft inheritance that raises the hackles.
To get to the issue of the more extreme variations of soft inheritance, it has to be determined whether the environment can induce an epigenetic change in an organism that can be inherited in subsequent generations. Certainly, nobody has shown that an epigenetically induced beneficial or adaptive change has been inherited.
read the article again, more carefully.
my reading of it is fine Head, point being whilst lamarck was dismissed, many seem to be looking back into it. no smoke without fire so to say
Kopite
Wasn't Mendel's work laid idol for decades?