Sorry, I didn't have the foresight to take pictures.
Anyway, it's more likely you've never seen great outdoor cannabis.
dazednconfused
Member
you would think so, but i'm a member here, so i'm privy to all the photos from users, plus what i've held in my hand. without photos i don't know what you're basing this on . . .. memory? lol
You didn't photograph the best looking bud you've ever seen in your life?
read through this thread and you'll see why the title says it all
I def respect outdoors a lot, and have seen the best of the best. But.... in terms of potency/quality/market price, it can't touch the highest quality indoor.
I agree. I'm not saying you could fill this thread with beautiful outdoor buds, but good looking buds says nothing about potency.
If you read through this thread I would be surprised if it didn't change your mind too.
Im guess id be nearing the classification of "old fart" by now .
The reason myself, and my peers that share the same meds as myself , prefer the outdoor over the indoor isnt really about potency at all , the quality of the high is the most important thing by far wouldnt you all agree??
The look of the herb and the thc content really isnt an indicator of a good smoke , they are just asthetics and numbers , the real test is in the quality of the high .
The other "old farts" that think along the same lines as me , dislike the high from indoor herb , most of what is grown here the quality and longevity of the high is quite inferior to well grown outdoor from good genetics .
Its all preferential , depends on mood , where you are , who your with , your tolerance etc etc
The best medicine is the one you find best for you .
The reason myself, and my peers that share the same meds as myself , prefer the outdoor over the indoor isnt really about potency at all , the quality of the high is the most important thing by far wouldnt you all agree??
The look of the herb and the thc content really isnt an indicator of a good smoke , they are just asthetics and numbers , the real test is in the quality of the high .
The other "old farts" that think along the same lines as me , dislike the high from indoor herb , most of what is grown here the quality and longevity of the high is quite inferior to well grown outdoor from good genetics .
Its all preferential , depends on mood , where you are , who your with , your tolerance etc etc
The best medicine is the one you find best for you .
D
dankitydank
Tough. There was one outdoor specimen that beat 90 percent of the indoor ive had this year. and thats saying alot, yes im comparing it to the highest quality indoor.
Sun?
Sun?
bluebublelove
Active member
I've had some absolutely killer outdoor bud that I never thought twice about dust being on...
if anything I think indoor plants that are in a relatively stagnant setting with many "outside" factors introduced to there enviroment can attribute to problems in indoor growing, i.e. pests, pet hair, clothing fibers, dust (oh no! not dust)
and other particulate matter - either way it's not that big of a deal in my book. definately doesn't outweigh a quality harvest of good smoke.
if anything I think indoor plants that are in a relatively stagnant setting with many "outside" factors introduced to there enviroment can attribute to problems in indoor growing, i.e. pests, pet hair, clothing fibers, dust (oh no! not dust)
and other particulate matter - either way it's not that big of a deal in my book. definately doesn't outweigh a quality harvest of good smoke.
No the wind doesn't have a filter, in fact it is the vehicle for dust, it carries the dust/debris/pollen.
Good post, and good point. The stuff from my last grow I don't like to smoke most of the time, too strong. lol. I effing hallucinate.
For the sake of argument we'd need a standard of measurement for any one person/claim to be viewed "right" - but we lack the tools and ability to test bud and determine a standard of measurement.
I don't think the OP intended to state that indoor bud will always give a better high, at least I never read that anywhere, I think he just meant to say that it generally cannabis grown indoors is a purer form of THC - containing fewer environmental contaminates such as dust, etc. I think most of us can agree on that.
In the 1980, early 90s not many people took photos. You do realize that digital cameras have only been available to the masses for the last 10 years or so, right? I quit growing outside because it's such a friggin' pain in the ass to do it right...which is why you see so much crap outdoor.
32 1/2 years of actual growing experience and obsession with growing is what I'm basing it on, 'lol'. What's your basis besides looking at other people's pictures on the Internet? 'lol'
No, reading a thread on the Internet where a bunch of people who don't have experience with outdoor who are engaging in a self congratulatory circle jerk doesn't make me believe something other than I've seen with my own eyes, 'lol'.
QFT
But, if you want to "sample" the many strains, indoor is the only option for many due to climate limitations.
I'll smoke any good bud....indoor or out
Harvest
Member
wow, lets all bow to you and your 32 years of experience...still bashing on people after all that time huh? And who doesn't have experience outdoors? thats where it all started for me. why don't you contribute to the discussion instead of being in your own congratulatory circle jerk.
"I don't think the OP intended to state that indoor bud will always give a better high, at least I never read that anywhere, I think he just meant to say that it generally cannabis grown indoors is a purer form of THC - containing fewer environmental contaminates such as dust, etc. I think most of us can agree on that."
jack DA reaper
Member
I live i hawaii all my life>>>>One of the best places for outdoor Other then the choppers..........Indoor weeds is much better then out,,,,,,from Ogz to The dawgs to the hazes......Outdoors is always a step below some one who knows how to fucking grow indoors !!!
