What's new

Los Angeles City Council approves medical marijuana ordinance that will shut down hun

bigbrokush

Active member
January 26, 2010 | 10:35 am

In a 9-3 vote, the Los Angeles City Council today gave its final approval to an ordinance that will shut down hundreds of medical marijuana dispensaries and impose strict rules on the location and operation of the dispensaries that are allowed.

The measure passed quickly, without debate.

The ordinance, which the council first began discussing more than 4 1/2 years ago, will cap the number of dispensaries at 70 but make an exception to allow all those that registered with the city in 2007 and have remained open. City officials believe that number is around 150.

Hundreds of dispensaries have opened in Los Angeles as the City Council debated its proposed ordinance and failed to enforce a moratorium on new dispensaries. City officials believe there are more than 500 that will be required to close under the ordinance, but some are already preparing to sue the city and collect signatures to force a referendum on the ordinance.

The ordinance also requires dispensaries to be at least 1,000 feet from other dispensaries and so-called sensitive uses, such as schools, parks and libraries. Among other restrictions, dispensaries will be required to close at 8 p.m. and will not be permitted to allow marijuana use at the stores.

The ordinance will not take effect until after Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa signs it and the City Council approves the fees that dispensaries will have to pay to cover the city's cost of monitoring. City officials are studying those costs and expect to propose the fees soon.

Once the ordinance is in place, the city attorney's office will send letters to affected landlords and dispensary operators telling them that they must close immediately. If the dispensaries remain open, the city attorney's office likely will take them to court.

-- John Hoeffel at City Hall
 

bigbrokush

Active member
Straight Question, Hazy Answers
Council members are asked one last question before they approve a pot ordinance
By JONATHAN LLOYD
Updated 10:23 AM PST, Tue, Jan 26, 2010

They sure have talked a lot about marijuana at City Hall.

Three years of discussion finally led to a decision Tuesday when the City Council ok'd a medical marijuana ordinance.

But before the end of this long, strange -- sometimes agonizingly slow -- trip, KPCC Radio asked council members, "Have you tried it?"

The answers ranged from candid to coy to "No comment."
“I was 15. It was after school. I was visiting a girl. And ya know, that’s what you did then," Councilman Tom LaBonge told KPCC.

Councilmember Herb Wesson didn't say "Yes" or "No."

“Let me say this," Wesson told KPCC. "I know what weed is. I went to college in 1969. And that’s my story and I’m sticking to it.”

Councilwoman Jan Perry said she has allergies.

Tony Cardenas and Jose Huizer refused to answer.

Council President Eric Garcetti simply said, "I have."

Janice Hahn said her father warned her, "'Don't do anything that you don't want to see on the front page of the L.A. Times tomorrow.' So I grew up afraid that I would embarrass my father," KPCC reported.

With a 9-3 vote, the council gave final approval to the plan at its morning meeting. The ordinance sets a cap of 70 dispensaries in Los Angeles but temporarily allows more than double that number to stay open -- specifically, the 187 dispensaries that registered with the city before Nov. 13, 2007 -- provided they adhere to certain restrictions.

Other requirements:

* If any of the 187 dispensaries closes or goes out of business, it will not be replaced until the overall number is reduced to 70.
* Dispensaries must be at least 1,000 feet away from schools, public parks, public libraries, religious institutions; licensed child care facilities, youth centers, rehab centers, and other dispensaries.
* As for homes, the council agreed to merely bar dispensaries from being "on a lot abutting, across the street or alley from, or having a common corner with a residentially zoned lot or a lot improved with residential use."
* No collective shall operate for profit.
* "Cash and in-kind contributions, reimbursements and reasonable compensation provided by members toward the collective's actual expenses for the growth, cultivation and provision of medical marijuana ... in strict compliance with state law'' are allowed.
* An independent certified public accountant would have to audit the collectives every year and submit the findings to the City Controller. Building and Safety inspectors and police officers would have to examine the location.
* Authorities cannot look into patients' records without a search warrant, subpoena or court order.
* The ordinance requires collectives to be open between 10 a.m. and 8 p.m.
* Security measures include bars on their windows, closed-circuit cameras, burglar alarms, and security guards patrolling a two- block radius around the location.
* Collectives cannot store more than $200 in cash overnight and would have to make twice-daily bank drops.

Since Sept. 14, 2007, Los Angeles has had a temporary ordinance that banned dispensaries other than those which registered with the city before Nov. 13, 2007. The temporary ordinance had a loophole that enabled operators to open about 800 dispensaries across Los Angeles.

The ordinance is subject to the mayor's approval. City officials said it will be about 45 days before they can enforce the ordinance.
Copyright City News Service
First Published: Jan 26, 2010 6:56 AM PS
 
Z

Zoolander

Just more black market weed on the streets which will end up being less $ than the club weed
 

bigbrokush

Active member
Well I think that more delivery services will pop back up and stay way underground with what they are doing.
 

johnnyla

Active member
Veteran
i wonder who greased the palms of the LA City council to get this version passed? Decreasing the amount of dispensaries through an ordinance will only limit competition and drive up prices for the patients. Someone made a good point at the meeting that the Council never discussed the needs of the patients and education for law enforcement on how to regulate and inspect. Does LAPD inspect RITE AID???
 

PharmaCan

Active member
Veteran
I bet Blue Dots jumping for joy...

:tumbleweed:

Hmph! This shows some real short-sightedness, I think, on the part of dispensary owners in lala land. They needed to get organized, and grease some wheels, and they didn't do that. It'll be interesting to see what the same owners will now spend on Attorneys' fees to try to stay in business.

In SoCal politics, it ain't over 'til the fat lady sings, and she hasn't sung her aria yet.

PC

:smokeit:
 
T

THCV

6400 a lb here we come again! hurray! 2007 was THE SHIT!

not really though--this sucks.
 

isit4.20yet

Member
I just hate the pompous "we will control you" attitude that "the lawmakers", supposedly our representatives, take on once they get into a position of power and governmental bribery.

I hope you guys can overturn it in a referendum vote. Me, I live in the other highest taxed, over-bureaucratized state on the other end of the country and we don't even have mmj.

Grow on!
 
T

THCV

demand will stay the same, but there will be more biz sent back to "street" dealers (good news!) and a few lucky dispensary owners will become rich due to their newly given legal monopoly status for each neighborhood. so anti-capitalist and anti-american, but i am sure they don't see it that way. whatever, street dealers have lower overhead which means better prices for patients anyway.
 

ThizZ

Member
I guess they must not really care about their crime rate cause I'm almost positive it will sky rocket lol and I have been to L.A plenty of times it really isn't that beautiful but I guess every city has it's goods and it's bad's but looking on the bright side of things like others have mentioned this is OUTSTANDING news for drug dealers
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top