SoCaliSmoker
Member
(I should have phrased it "is texting ruining the English language" sorry guys)
We all know for whatever political reasons, they love to keep us dumb and in the dark, and we always see politicians "FIGHTING" for more education in schools, while more and more schools keep shutting down and teachers getting laid off. And for the money that does get allowed for funding, we still see desks from 1986 in classrooms and teachers salaries never going up.
So aside from school education, you can see everywhere that texting is the new craze. It's deeper than a 'LOL' here and there a 'ROFL', 'LMAO', 'BTW', or 'IMO'. We can read those and understand those well.
But wat hapinz wen we try 2 tok 2 sum1 in tex?
You can see the younger generation texting while driving (it's illegal in most areas now) and texting for like 50 minutes back and forth when you could have had a 2 minute phone call (I am a victim every once in a while) but it's not the text I'm raggin on. It's the quality of English from the abbreviation of words were using.
Go to Google right now and type in "is texting ruining the English language?" and you wouldn't even be able to type out the whole sentence before Google finishes it for you (that means alot of people have typed that in) or type in "is texting making us stupid?" and you'll find all kinds of links from Professors explaining what texting can do over long term use.
Are we going to continue on a cycle of abbreviation and short spellings until we go back to the caveman era of just grunting and hoping the other person understands? Or "cyber grunting" since technology is so rampant?
Is texting ruining our vocabulary? Or do we just not care about how things are pronounced or spelled anymore?
R'member, dis culd B yur kid sumday. Jus sumthin 2 cunsider......
We all know for whatever political reasons, they love to keep us dumb and in the dark, and we always see politicians "FIGHTING" for more education in schools, while more and more schools keep shutting down and teachers getting laid off. And for the money that does get allowed for funding, we still see desks from 1986 in classrooms and teachers salaries never going up.
So aside from school education, you can see everywhere that texting is the new craze. It's deeper than a 'LOL' here and there a 'ROFL', 'LMAO', 'BTW', or 'IMO'. We can read those and understand those well.
But wat hapinz wen we try 2 tok 2 sum1 in tex?
You can see the younger generation texting while driving (it's illegal in most areas now) and texting for like 50 minutes back and forth when you could have had a 2 minute phone call (I am a victim every once in a while) but it's not the text I'm raggin on. It's the quality of English from the abbreviation of words were using.
Go to Google right now and type in "is texting ruining the English language?" and you wouldn't even be able to type out the whole sentence before Google finishes it for you (that means alot of people have typed that in) or type in "is texting making us stupid?" and you'll find all kinds of links from Professors explaining what texting can do over long term use.
Are we going to continue on a cycle of abbreviation and short spellings until we go back to the caveman era of just grunting and hoping the other person understands? Or "cyber grunting" since technology is so rampant?
Is texting ruining our vocabulary? Or do we just not care about how things are pronounced or spelled anymore?
R'member, dis culd B yur kid sumday. Jus sumthin 2 cunsider......