ambr0sia
Member
Looks slick! I'm in the process of selecting and purchasing my new fan / filter combo, and S&P is certainly on my list. I'm curious, though - Why did you go with S&P when a Vortex 4" @ a rougly equivilant CFM is only ~$30 more and comes w/ a 10 year warranty?Cozy Amnesia said:Introducing the S&P TD-125:
Happy b'day, mate!Cozy Amnesia said:BTW, today is my 21st birthday.:friends:
Can you expand upon this a bit? Specifically, what would be the best W/sq.F ratio for a single 150W? I'm working on partitioning my new cab into veg, flower, and utility today, so this info is quite timelyCozy Amnesia said:If you're going by the old saying that you should have 50 watts per square foot, then 3 sq ft is ideal for 150s. BUT this is a poor estimation. Due to intensity decreasing at an exponential rate the relation is not going to be linear, and each size light is going to behave very differently. Here is a graph showing the light intensity function (power/(4pi*r^2)) of three different popular HPS sizes. The red is a 150w, the green is 400w, and the blue is 1000w.
This graph though is not reflective of actual lumen output I don't think, but they're probably very similar. The area of the "sweet spot" would be in the distance that isn't too far away but not too close either. You can see that the 150 watt decreases at a much greater rate than the larger lights, and therefor the area of it's sweat spot will be much more limited.