G
guest
There is no accepted medical use of marijuana in the United States.
Last edited:
G
guest
The question is fair to ask.
If someone would allow my children to be stolen from me because of a plant, Why would I vote for them? They are not protecting me.
I'm not talking about a court case. I'm talking about the people they are supposed to be serving and protecting.
And November is only a few short weeks away.
If someone would allow my children to be stolen from me because of a plant, Why would I vote for them? They are not protecting me.
I'm not talking about a court case. I'm talking about the people they are supposed to be serving and protecting.
And November is only a few short weeks away.
Last edited:
G
guest
It is time for Gery Brown to explain why he would allow it within his state of California.
G
guest
My goal is to eliminate the marijuana laws in the entire US.
Retroactive to 1996.
I plan to do this before November.
And in doing so arrange it so many of you are able to claim back tax refunds that should have been yours.
US tax code section 280E was voted in to be effective for the tax year 1983.
If your business involves Schedule 1 or 2 drugs, you may not claim lawyer fees as a deduction. This section of tax code is based on fraud.
If we succeed with getting them to see the errors of their ways, we get a check.
The check might be debatable, but the herb will still be free.
Retroactive to 1996.
I plan to do this before November.
And in doing so arrange it so many of you are able to claim back tax refunds that should have been yours.
US tax code section 280E was voted in to be effective for the tax year 1983.
If your business involves Schedule 1 or 2 drugs, you may not claim lawyer fees as a deduction. This section of tax code is based on fraud.
If we succeed with getting them to see the errors of their ways, we get a check.
The check might be debatable, but the herb will still be free.
Last edited:
And if you have any doubts- click the link in my sig and read the whole thing!
And pb, watch your language, sir! There are ladies present......at least, I think there's a few around here, somewhere. lol I think I would have gone with "absolute" or "blatant" or even "grossly erroneous" lie. - Granny
And pb, watch your language, sir! There are ladies present......at least, I think there's a few around here, somewhere. lol I think I would have gone with "absolute" or "blatant" or even "grossly erroneous" lie. - Granny
G
guest
A couple of days ago a federal court ruled that the DEA can no longer operate in California.
** Edit this point is in error. The judge had accepted documents from a plaintiff in which the plaintiff had accused the DEA of violating law. My information came from here:
The walls are cracking. Doors are opening before me as I do this walk.
Walk with me, if you wish.
** Edit this point is in error. The judge had accepted documents from a plaintiff in which the plaintiff had accused the DEA of violating law. My information came from here:
**
The walls are cracking. Doors are opening before me as I do this walk.
Walk with me, if you wish.
Last edited:
G
guest
To "believe" only requires two things
To have a desired result in mind.
Take a token action based on that "picture."
I ask that, if even for only a moment, you picture that marijuana is already legal.
Then take some small token action. Such as forwarding this thread to someone else.
To have a desired result in mind.
Take a token action based on that "picture."
I ask that, if even for only a moment, you picture that marijuana is already legal.
Then take some small token action. Such as forwarding this thread to someone else.
Last edited:
Tony Danza
Member
I can't be the only one who can read.
I can't be the only one who can read.
Does no one see the syntax loophole? The federal government does not accept any medical applications for MJ so there is no "accepted" medical use, they're not lying, they're just full of shit. Is it OK for them to play word games? Apparently it is, they're certainly not going to see any consequences for it.
Oh and did you hear about that new kind of "skunk" marijuana that is 10 times as addictive and lethal as conventional marijuana? It's the government, what do you expect.
I can't be the only one who can read.
Does no one see the syntax loophole? The federal government does not accept any medical applications for MJ so there is no "accepted" medical use, they're not lying, they're just full of shit. Is it OK for them to play word games? Apparently it is, they're certainly not going to see any consequences for it.
Oh and did you hear about that new kind of "skunk" marijuana that is 10 times as addictive and lethal as conventional marijuana? It's the government, what do you expect.
G
guest
2006 the supreme court ruled that states determine what is "accepted" for medical use for themselves.
Is it used medically? Yes.
Has it been accepted by voters? Yes
Do you accept it for yourself? Most here say yes.
Has the idea been accepted by the citizens of the US. 80% yes.
Is it used medically? Yes.
Has it been accepted by voters? Yes
Do you accept it for yourself? Most here say yes.
Has the idea been accepted by the citizens of the US. 80% yes.
G
guest
Again. This is not about a court case.
It is about common sense and the voters perception.
It is about common sense and the voters perception.
Tony Danza
Member
peanutbutter said:
If that's true, that rocks, you gotta link to the story?
I only challenge your rhetoric to make it stronger, keep fighting the good fight.
CaptainTrips
Active member
Tony Danza said:
The federal goverment sends like 6 people every month, a months supply of JOINTS (lol) SO they full of fucking shit when they say that.
W
Wunderkind
I understand law.
G
guest
quick snapshot.
2006 supreme court ruled states determine acceptable medical practice within itself.
case was about their ability to yank doctors licenses under the authority of the CSA.
DEA was told off limits. leave the doctors alone.
DEA has applied that to doctors ever since. Even for marijuana.
However they continued to undermine the rest of the medical chain. supply and patient.
latest case, DEA claimed they had no way to determine medical or non-medical use. Court said that ain't a good thing .. Your lack of ability makes it so that you are violating the state law intentionally.
2006 supreme court ruled states determine acceptable medical practice within itself.
case was about their ability to yank doctors licenses under the authority of the CSA.
DEA was told off limits. leave the doctors alone.
DEA has applied that to doctors ever since. Even for marijuana.
However they continued to undermine the rest of the medical chain. supply and patient.
latest case, DEA claimed they had no way to determine medical or non-medical use. Court said that ain't a good thing .. Your lack of ability makes it so that you are violating the state law intentionally.
im intrested to know what 4 jack-asses though its ok for the FED to play word games.
i believe there refering to 'accepted' as a form of them getting billions$ out of it. the only way to do that with weed is to outlaw it so they can play the game.
i believe there refering to 'accepted' as a form of them getting billions$ out of it. the only way to do that with weed is to outlaw it so they can play the game.
G
guest
80 million US citizens have been arrested because of government fraud.
That should be a very motivated group of people.
100,000 US citizens die every year from cancer.
Another highly motivated group. Even more when you add in family.
Anyone who wished to stay in office has only one choice. End the war now.
That should be a very motivated group of people.
100,000 US citizens die every year from cancer.
Another highly motivated group. Even more when you add in family.
Anyone who wished to stay in office has only one choice. End the war now.
WoW maannnn
Member
i like it, get it to EVERYONE.
G
guest
I have established several points to launch from. On the internet. All at the same time.
This includes my sermon to the Men of God of our nation. It was designed to launch into viral mode with a time delay factor built in.
In that video I ask for the person who is listening to take the time to consider deeply, do research, pray for a while and then act. This phase takes time.
I have that platform to launch from now. It is ready to accept the new link to my current work.
There are several other locations I have made ready also.
Doors are opening. Walls are crumbling.
Like a bowel movement .. this will pass.
This includes my sermon to the Men of God of our nation. It was designed to launch into viral mode with a time delay factor built in.
In that video I ask for the person who is listening to take the time to consider deeply, do research, pray for a while and then act. This phase takes time.
I have that platform to launch from now. It is ready to accept the new link to my current work.
There are several other locations I have made ready also.
Doors are opening. Walls are crumbling.
Like a bowel movement .. this will pass.
G
guest
Here is a large batch of very hard work. Done by Rev. Carl Olsen.Wunderkind said:
I intend to give him substantial credit for the work he has done:
http://www.iowamedicalmarijuana.org/petitions/dea.aspx
