Biden: No Guns for Weed Smokers

[flylowgethigh]

Covid showed the MIC control over the med feds. Revolving door, research contract kickbacks, pharma writing the rules… foochie has set medicine back to almost zero regarding trust.

First do no damn harm, little rat.

 

[audiohi]

 

[RobFromTX]

 

[Charles Dankens]

Covid showed the MIC control over the med feds. Revolving door, research contract kickbacks, pharma writing the rules… foochie has set medicine back to almost zero regarding trust.

First do no damn harm, little rat.

Sounds like you sucked your findings from Bannon's greasy blowhole.

 

[mean mr.mustard]

Basically Marijuana was outlawed because unlike most other drugs it can be grown at home and does not rely on the release of endogenously produced neurotransmitters for its effect. The reason this is relevant is because the Counter Intelligence Program ran by the FBI uses MK-Ultra type technologies, the effectiveness of which is hampered by the effect of cannabis and by the fact that the feds can't fully controll your ability to obtain it by using networks of informants to secretly run "the dope game" like they do with other drugs which aren't as easy to grow/manufacture. In other words its a threat to the rouge MK-Ultra agenda. Generally speaking these people are pathetic controll freaks who's pathological desire to have control over others in sick, twisted ways is further exacerbated by their delusional, and fiendish need to disprove their own perceptions of their own inferiority. Basically their loosers who played it safe in life and thought they had a chance to become something which would finally make them popular enough to become the Alpha or whatever. Then it turns out being a Fed or a fucking sell out President didn't make them the top dog who gets all the play with the hotties or whatever and then their controll mechanism is threatened by groups of people who are smarter then them, some of whom smoke cannabis and aren't miserable pathetic fucking dweebs trying to over compensate for how poorly adjusted they are by tramatizing everyone whos supperior to them in an way whatsoever. Basically it makes them feel better if the people they can't mind controll as effectively don't have guns to defend them selves. You know, just incase they have another tantrum and can't help but commit another full blown mass mindcontroll terrorist attack on all the "resentable" people all over again like they just finished doing for the umpteenth fucking time.

That being sed George Washington smoked cannabis and owned fucking guns and killed people with them for his country; It's unconstitutional to deny our second amendment right to over throw a government sponsored tyranny. Particularly one like MK-Ultra that Congress it's self outlawed in 1973, Which would require owning and or/using guns as per the Second Amendment to the Constitution. So if these fucking sell out retards think they can take our guns because we smoke cannabis, but fucking meth addicts, guys on PCP and blacked out drunks can have them (not to mention MK-Ulta power junkies) then they will have to amend the constitution to do so, or face legal retribution.

Cannabis was initially outlawed because racist Harry Anslinger was in cahoots with William Randolph Hearst and there was a huge interest in keeping a strong natural fiber out of the pulp industry.

Nylon was new and lumber had been king. Hemp was known for its fiber and was a threat to the fiber market and presented a challenge to inferior fiber production.

 

[PlasmaTube]

In times like these, I like turning to case law, state laws, federal laws, and the good ol constitution.

How is the executive branch CEO of a DNB corp (USA) who does not have the lawful power to limit my right without due process of law....going to limit my rights of owning my property which I am not registered or licensed through/by the state?

Owning property is a right in itself. Owning a gun is a constitutional right. Under what prevision, statute, or most importantly LAW...is he planning on "limiting, nullifying", etc. a man or a woman's right to own and use their property lawfully?

Regardless....I don't get into politics..I just try to know my fundamental rights...The rest is a matter of asserting your constitutional rights. If you don't know em...you ain't got em. If you know em...people in "positions of power" start talking to you different.

#KnowYourStatutes
#KnowYourRights
#ReadYourStateConstitution
#ReadYourMunicipalLaws

 

[RobFromTX]

In times like these, I like turning to case law, state laws, federal laws, and the good ol constitution.

How is the executive branch CEO of a DNB corp (USA) who does not have the lawful power to limit my right without due process of law....going to limit my rights of owning my property which I am not registered or licensed through/by the state?

Owning property is a right in itself. Owning a gun is a constitutional right. Under what prevision, statute, or most importantly LAW...is he planning on "limiting, nullifying", etc. a man or a woman's right to own and use their property lawfully?

Regardless....I don't get into politics..I just try to know my fundamental rights...The rest is a matter of asserting your constitutional rights. If you don't know em...you ain't got em. If you know em...people in "positions of power" start talking to you different.

#KnowYourStatutes
#KnowYourRights
#ReadYourStateConstitution
#ReadYourMunicipalLaws

Hes not really planning to ban anything at this point. Hes just trying to cling to his subaru warrior base incase he decides to run again. Oregons a model of why gun control will never work. None of the sheriffs outside portland would enforce it

 

[mean mr.mustard]

They would if they were afraid of the public at large.

Laws are scary things.

 

[RobFromTX]

People can be scary things too. Especially when they feel backed into a corner. Ive been to East Oregon. Its a world away from PDX

 

[flylowgethigh]

They want to take away our guns so we have no recourse to what they have in store for us. Simple. It is why the right to own them is almost as important as the right to say “back off or I’ll kill you”.

Those who wish to exert their will upon others, enslaving them, hate that kind of free speech, and they hate when it can be backed up.

Founders of this country made those the two most important rights. They are essential for freedom and liberty.

 

[Frosty Nuggets]

Some good info on the legal system as opposed to Law and why legislation does not apply to the private individual.

Home - A Warrior Calls

. Canada Calls Out To The World ************************************* CHILD TRAFFICKING EMERGENCY ALERT Discover the the horrific events taking place in Canada by listening to the true stories of ordinary Canadians… We need you for this… Final Notice. And here…

awarriorcalls.com

 

[mean mr.mustard]

People can be scary things too. Especially when they feel backed into a corner. Ive been to East Oregon. Its a world away from PDX

There's definitely a lot of scary people there, and Idaho.

 

[RobFromTX]

And Portland.....

 

[mean mr.mustard]

Maybe the civil war starts in Oregon.

Regardless, nobody is going to be taking any guns at that point (unless they're just picking them up off of the ground).

Anybody that really believes that law enforcement is going to take their guns needs to look at all of the unanswered crimes they're intended to prevent.

I apologize for any reality check, back to the politics of Biden taking guns away from pot smokers.

 

[moose eater]

Maybe the civil war starts in Oregon.

Regardless, nobody is going to be taking any guns at that point (unless they're just picking them up off of the ground).

Anybody that really believes that law enforcement is going to take their guns needs to look at all of the unanswered crimes they're intended to prevent.

I apologize for any reality check, back to the politics of Biden taking guns away from pot smokers.

Without a proper boogeyman people might be forced to buy tickets to scary movies. Have you seen the price of popcorn in the theaters??!! THAT'S some scary, disconcerting shit!!

 

[armedoldhippy]

Without a proper boogeyman

sometimes there really IS something under the bed. gun owners concerned about seizures and being told "they're not really gonna do it" need only to look at the abortion fight and remember that "they can't really do it" because "the Supreme Court has already ruled..." the Supremes have really upset the apple cart as far as what Congress might actually do...or try to.

 

[moose eater]

sometimes there really IS something under the bed. gun owners concerned about seizures and being told "they're not really gonna do it" need only to look at the abortion fight and remember that "they can't really do it" because "the Supreme Court has already ruled..." the Supremes have really upset the apple cart as far as what Congress might actually do...or try to.

Wrong team.

Looking at the times that "They're coming for our guns" has been yelled across the Nation, and the number of times it turned to reality, is like 12-0 or better at the moment.

Clinton's 'assault weapons ban' (which had a sunset in it and wasn't renewed) merely resulted in an AKM having a thumb-hole stock and no bayonet lug, all of which came back later after the bill died and went to bed.

During that 'assault weapons ban' the Ruger factory (20 & 30-rd.) magazines for their class III weapons and Mini-14s they fit, went from $25/each for a 30-rd. mag to $150/per each 30-round mag (in private sales, as Ruger had stopped making them for civies under public and political pressure already). That too came back down after the bill died, but when I sold my sizable collection of Ruger factory mags, it made me a good deal of money, and I sold below market price at that time.

Ask yourself how many of these Second Amendment supporting, brave keyboard warriors raised up arms or organized during the illegal/extra-legal wiretapping and cloning of messages post-USA PATRIOT ACT?

Or the seizing of patrons' records from businesses with no warrants?

Where was all that threatened pro-Constitution anger when that shit occurred? It clearly violated the US and many states' constitutions.

Hollow drums nearly all of them. Stuffed shirts with bullhorns and no balls when it matters.

The people who took a stand in the open tended to do so via political organizing (Bill of Rights Defense Committees, which were infiltrated illegally by DoD UCs on American soil; Posse Commitatus, anyone? Anyone go ballistic and armed over that shit?). And those who were intent on doing something other (more serious) than that said very little publicly, with no open beating of their chests.

Despite the ink on paper (or parchment), no government is going to authorize, permit, or stand by, for any over-throw of that government. No matter what anyone thinks they promised.

The Jews of Warsaw and other similar groups (Sons of Liberty, Mujahideen, etc.) had it down. If that time comes, "any weapon you need will be laying on the ground next to a corpse" (to quote a merc and weapons dealer I knew), or to be stolen from an armory; they're easy to find.. Or you can take it from the fascists with a knife, garrot, or what ever you've found at that time. Or keep those you have buried in containers that can't be spotted from GSR.

If something goes bump in the night, it's highly doubtful that it's someone coming for your firearms.

Edit: All of those restrictions, whether the May 19, 1986 restriction on home-built class III select-fire stuff on Form 1's, or Clinton's 'assault weapons ban', etc. had 'grandfather clauses' in them re. existing weapons. The powers that be know that restricting new firearms, temporarily or otherwise, is a whole lot easier to accomplish than going out into a HUGE Nation, door to door, and seizing weapons that already exist, literally numbering in the 100's of millions, if not BILLIONS. It's why they do gun-buy-backs instead. Easier, more apt to succeed, even if in small numbers, and a lot less risky.

 

[Three Berries]

Abortion was a court decided right, not one written as an amendment to the Constitution. What the SCOTUS makes they can take.

 

[armedoldhippy]

a HUGE Nation, door to door, and seizing weapons that already exist

it sounds like a "rallying cry" more than anything. restricting new stuff much easier than getting folks to turn over what they already own. been several large cities doing "voluntary buy-backs" for years now. mostly cheap pistols, crime guns, and non-functioning rifles from all i've read. most of them limit payment to $200 or something pitiful like that. not gonna get many AR-15s at that price "voluntarily"... if they pass a law/mandatory buy-back/surrenders over objections of voters and in violation of the 2nd Amendment, we're gonna have a bumper crop of felons unable to vote if detected...which may be what they want. if you can't vote, "fuck what you think" seems to be their motto.

 

[RobFromTX]

So true. Ive known a world of criminals and none of them would engage in those buybacks. Monetarily nor voluntarily