What's new

American Racism - and the Anti-White Left -

Amynamous

Active member
umm...I've got some really bad news my friend.

America was founded by white nationalists, and was intended for their posterity.

I'm happy to provide sources if that is truly necessary.

...yikes.

“Founded”….hahaha
Yeah, it was found, alright.
The Spanish, French and other Europeans found the place already inhabited, but you probably don’t want to talk about that.
The “white” folk couldn’t hack building a country on their own, and probably couldn’t get any support from the locals, so they “invited” folk from Africa and other exotic locations to come to America and do the “work” for them. This trend of inviting non-white foreigners to come to America to do the actual hard work involved with building and feeding a nation has been repeated again and again and again to this very day. So from the very beginning, America was not a white nation, and by it’s actions spanning centuries, demonstrated it did not intend to be a white nation.

It’s certainly not a white nation now, either. The 2020 census makes that abundantly clear. Caucasians are very quickly becoming a minority and it’s showing itself in our elected representatives. The US Senate and House is becoming less and less “white” with every election. Same goes with state elections as well. Heck, I can’t even remember the last time my state had a gringo governor. :D
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
Does anyone really care what white nationalists want?
The US is not a white nation, has never been a white nation and will never, ever be a white nation.
End of story.

you are arguing using different definitions. theirs is "white people were in charge and that makes it a white nation". from THAT perspective, India and South Africa used to be "white nations" lol...
 

Sunshineinabag

Active member
“Founded”….hahaha
Yeah, it was found, alright.
The Spanish, French and other Europeans found the place already inhabited, but you probably don’t want to talk about that.
The “white” folk couldn’t hack building a country on their own, and probably couldn’t get any support from the locals, so they “invited” folk from Africa and other exotic locations to come to America and do the “work” for them. This trend of inviting non-white foreigners to come to America to do the actual hard work involved with building and feeding a nation has been repeated again and again and again to this very day. So from the very beginning, America was not a white nation, and by it’s actions spanning centuries, demonstrated it did not intend to be a white nation.

It’s certainly not a white nation now, either. The 2020 census makes that abundantly clear. Caucasians are very quickly becoming a minority and it’s showing itself in our elected representatives. The US Senate and House is becoming less and less “white” with every election. Same goes with state elections as well. Heck, I can’t even remember the last time my state had a gringo governor. :D

Tell that to the thousands of Irish who died building railroads......or I'm sure the Chinese would love to hear your diatribe about skin colors building up this area lol
back Zhen u could disappear quick Amy...it way sn accident.....perspectives :party:
 

Sunshineinabag

Active member
Invited fokl from Africa.......bought them from superior tribes whom had already. Enslaved them....?





Can u show me an example of pristine neighborhood areas in America revitalized by black folks? Cause I need to see it
:rtfo:
 

Amynamous

Active member
Invited fokl from Africa.......bought them from superior tribes whom had already. Enslaved them....?





Can u show me an example of pristine neighborhood areas in America revitalized by black folks? Cause I need to see it
:rtfo:

I was being facetious.
As to the Irish, did the brits consider them to be “white” during the 18th and 19th century? Seems to me the brits didn’t treat them as equals at the time.

Since the Europeans invaded and stole the new world from it’s original inhabitants, people from around the world, encompassing a wide assortment of cultures and nationalities, have come to the US. It’s as true now as it was last century, and the century before that and the century before that. My point is, the US is not a white country, has never been a white country, and will never ever be a white country. Anyone wanting to live in a white country should consider moving.
 
“Founded”….hahaha
Yeah, it was found, alright.
The Spanish, French and other Europeans found the place already inhabited, but you probably don’t want to talk about that.
Ah, therein lies the confusion. You were serious after all! The United States is what is called a "country." Hence the "founding" of a "country" called the United States via Europeans. North America is what is referred to as a "land mass." I will elaborate further if this is unclear.

The “white” folk couldn’t hack building a country on their own, and probably couldn’t get any support from the locals, so they “invited” folk from Africa and other exotic locations to come to America and do the “work” for them.
A common belief. The "locals" of the land mass were slaughtering rival tribes children routinely as human sacrifice for several thousand years. White people built every meaningful institution in this country. I'm happy to dissect this narrative that fat white guys hired black off The MayFlower and that these blacks magically built the nation while white men lounged in castles or whatever your belief is...do you really want to? In other words do you really believe what you're saying here?
The "This trend of inviting non-white foreigners to come to America to do the actual hard work involved with building and feeding a nation has been repeated again and again and again to this very day. So from the very beginning, America was not a white nation, and by it’s actions spanning centuries, demonstrated it did not intend to be a white nation.
Again, this confusion seems to stem from the "land mass versus nation" confusion.


It’s certainly not a white nation now, either. The 2020 census makes that abundantly clear. Caucasians are very quickly becoming a minority and it’s showing itself in our elected representatives. The US Senate and House is becoming less and less “white” with every election. Same goes with state elections as well. Heck, I can’t even remember the last time my state had a gringo governor. :D

Right, of course America is no longer a white nation. Europe is no longer European. Modern America is a Jewish death cult based on nihilism and usury. That was never the claim
 
I was being facetious.
As to the Irish, did the brits consider them to be “white” during the 18th and 19th century? Seems to me the brits didn’t treat them as equals at the time.
Another common myth meant to marginize white people. Yes, there was anti-Irish sentiment. Yes, Irish were considered white because...of course they were. There were Irish men who signed the Declaration of Independence.
Since the Europeans invaded and stole the new world from it’s original inhabitants, people from around the world, encompassing a wide assortment of cultures and nationalities, have come to the US.
So you made this up. There was no "theft." It's called a war- there are winners and losers, and winners enjoy the spoils. This is Life 101 since the dawn of time. Are you of the belief that the Apache Tribe gained its' claims to land by respectful debate and a competitive game of chess?
It’s as true now as it was last century, and the century before that and the century before that. My point is, the US is not a white country, has never been a white country, and will never ever be a white country. Anyone wanting to live in a white country should consider moving.
If the whole "white men only who also owned black slaves" part didn't give it away...I guess we can resort to the Naturalization Act of 1790? Ya know, the whole "relevant to....free white persons of good character" bit?
 
Something I’ve noticed when chatting with most opponents of white solidarity is that they don’t have a counter argument. That is, it’s not that they are hypocritical, inconsistent, intellectually sloppy- they don’t actually hold a position. They reply with memes or low brow cliches from their favorite film. They are acting purely as a vessel for cultural norms.
Once white erasure is introduced as a topic worthy of conversation, the cruelty of this view invariably shines through:

“Good! White people are awful, they don’t deserve a homeland! They don’t deserve to exist!”- Obviously psychopathic and inhumane

“ Why are you so obsessed with race?”- a common non-argument meant to reiterate servitude to cultural norms which require we, at once, obsess about race and also not discuss white decline. Also used to pathologize in-group preference.

“Powerful people only have so much influence! White demographic decline happened organically!” A grown man actually said this to me once.
Etc. etc.


This is why white nationalists are banned from social media under the guise of “promoting hate” or some such childishness. The moral intuition of most white people is to be devastated by the idea of a uniquely-colored rhino going extinct. And yet we are to believe that most whites are ambivalent- even happy- about an entire race being replaced?
No…of course not. People know what the acceptable position is and they react accordingly.

The real question is “Who are these elite that are promoting demographic replacement, and why are they doing it? What do they have in common?” …Yet another question that both conservatives and liberals lack the backbone to take seriously. They are terrified of going down that road. And so they just…don’t think about it. It’s incredible to witness. Modern neoliberalism is an ethnosuicide cult based on usury and nihilism.
 
Last edited:

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
"The fact that Right-wingers in America shrug in helplessness as whooping, howling mobs of Bolshevized monkeys, along with their opioid-addled degenerate allies, denigrate White history and smash the symbols of White honor and glory----yet are ready to lose their jobs on principle over not taking a vaccine----shows to what extent our collective consciousness has already been neutralized and disarmed.

I'm not saying you shouldn't be pissed about the vaccine mandate. But being more pissed about taking the vaccine than about your history being torn down and violated around you is like if your wife was raped and you were most worried about now catching an STD from her. The worst harm that could come to you from taking a vaccine is ten times less than the harm done to you by the loss of your honor as a people and nationality.

And if the Right had that mindset from the beginning, if it wasn't constantly undermined by cowards and traitors preaching individualism when racial solidarity was needed, we would never have come to this point. If the Right had rallied behind those who attempted to prevent the Lee statue from being pulled down in Charlottesville, if Whites marched and rioted every time our symbols and history were violated, or every time our innocent men, women and children were slaughtered by inhuman Blacks or immigrants, then we would now have the collective racial power to oppose this mandate.

Thinking only of ourselves and our own rights is how we will lose all our rights and ultimately our very lives. Thinking of our people as a whole, being willing to risk job loss not just for yourself but for the honor of your ancestors, is how you will gain the power to resist these kinds of mandates from the Left."

- Warren Balogh

What are the symbols of White honor and glory? Are you quoting Warren Balogh of the National Justice Party in the above quote?

To clarify. You're asking me to prove that the Founding Fathers of the United States- men who literally owned black slaves- were white nationalists?
To clarify, your post I quoted above no where states "that the Founding Fathers of the United States- men who literally owned black slaves- were white nationalists". That's not what you posted at all. Had you posted that I would have agreed with you.

"whooping, howling mobs of Bolshevized monkeys" sounds straight out of the National Alliance playbook. Are you still happy to provide sources for your post?
 
What are the symbols of White honor and glory? Are you quoting Warren Balogh of the National Justice Party in the above quote?
Yes.
To clarify, your post I quoted above no where states "that the Founding Fathers of the United States- men who literally owned black slaves- were white nationalists". That's not what you posted at all. Had you posted that I would have agreed with you.

"whooping, howling mobs of Bolshevized monkeys" sounds straight out of the National Alliance playbook. Are you still happy to provide sources for your post?

"America was founded by white nationalists, and was intended for their posterity.

I'm happy to provide sources if that is truly necessary."

What would you like sourced? The tearing down of monuments in Charlottesville?
 

entropical

Active member
Veteran
"whooping, howling mobs of Bolshevized monkeys" sounds straight out of the National Alliance playbook. Are you still happy to provide sources for your post?

Sounds like what you could see on any news segment covering your election year riots..
 
A diverging opinion from leftist who would tear down statues to prove you wrong. But ”white” is not even a national category to begin with. It would be more accurate to say that the United States will never be a nation and leave it at that.
I disagree, I think we all know what "white" means, and that biology bares this out if we really need to get autistic about it.

But I think the more important argument is, we are being attacked as white people. In other words, anti-white hate mobs- mostly Jewish- see us as white when being white has a negative connotation.

When it comes to "white fragility," "white institutional racism," etc...suddenly- as though it were magic- there is no confusion about what it means to be a white person. A toddler can recognize a white man in these circumstances.

But when whites attempt to save themselves via solidarity, suddenly there is an affectation of mass confusion about what it means to be white- and whether "white" is even a category at all! Amazing how that works.

If you are attacked as a race, you are that race- you don't get to decide. If whites continue down this path of "everyone else is a member of a group, but we are individualists!" then there is no future for white children. It really is that simple.

My position is that white children should have a future. Sickening levels of hate oozing from that statement- I know. What can I say.
 

buzzmobile

Well-known member
Veteran
I believe you.
maya.jpg
 

entropical

Active member
Veteran
I disagree, I think we all know what "white" means, and that biology bares this out if we really need to get autistic about it.

But I think the more important argument is, we are being attacked as white people. In other words, anti-white hate mobs- mostly Jewish- see us as white when being white has a negative connotation.

When it comes to "white fragility," "white institutional racism," etc...suddenly- as though it were magic- there is no confusion about what it means to be a white person. A toddler can recognize a white man in these circumstances.

But when whites attempt to save themselves via solidarity, suddenly there is an affectation of mass confusion about what it means to be white- and whether "white" is even a category at all! Amazing how that works.

If you are attacked as a race, you are that race- you don't get to decide. If whites continue down this path of "everyone else is a member of an group, but we are individualists!" then there is no future for white children. It really is that simple.
They do not attack you as a race, they attack you as being a color. Color, however, is not a national category and is the definition of a false label. And yes, they like to attack using such labels as it is convenient and work in their interest. Hence the importance of using accurate labels. They create false labels for a reason. So when you say ”there is no future for white children” my response would be of course, there is no such thing as white children: ”white” children are not white.

And so speaking of a european nationalism, a euro-american nationalism or just plain nationalism would be more appropriate than refering to nationality in terms of a color imo. In the end black and white are set up as opposing forces on the grand masonic chessboard, and to the rulers it is a ploy to have you thinking in terms of color and to identify with color rather than your actual nation. Infinitely more than white, I look upon myself and see myself as european.
 

Amynamous

Active member
I disagree, I think we all know what "white" means, and that biology bares this out if we really need to get autistic about it.

But I think the more important argument is, we are being attacked as white people. In other words, anti-white hate mobs- mostly Jewish- see us as white when being white has a negative connotation.

When it comes to "white fragility," "white institutional racism," etc...suddenly- as though it were magic- there is no confusion about what it means to be a white person. A toddler can recognize a white man in these circumstances.

But when whites attempt to save themselves via solidarity, suddenly there is an affectation of mass confusion about what it means to be white- and whether "white" is even a category at all! Amazing how that works.

If you are attacked as a race, you are that race- you don't get to decide. If whites continue down this path of "everyone else is a member of a group, but we are individualists!" then there is no future for white children. It really is that simple.

My position is that white children should have a future. Sickening levels of hate oozing from that statement- I know. What can I say.

My position as an American is that ALL American children should have a future.
My position as a global citizen is that ALL children should have a future.
Race is irrelevant.

Nationalism based on race as it was practiced in Europe last century and how it is being currently espoused in the US is exclusionary, hateful and filled with a never ending assortment of boogymen scapegoats. I can’t think of a single time where racial nationalism didn’t end in violence, widespread death and destruction. Rational people want no part of that.
 

Amynamous

Active member
Ah, therein lies the confusion. You were serious after all! The United States is what is called a "country." Hence the "founding" of a "country" called the United States via Europeans. North America is what is referred to as a "land mass." I will elaborate further if this is unclear.
Point taken, but nonetheless, non whites were here before America’s founding, fought and died for America’s creation, and many slaves were freed as a result of their service.
A common belief. The "locals" of the land mass were slaughtering rival tribes children routinely as human sacrifice for several thousand years. White people built every meaningful institution in this country. I'm happy to dissect this narrative that fat white guys hired black off The MayFlower and that these blacks magically built the nation while white men lounged in castles or whatever your belief is...do you really want to? In other words do you really believe what you're saying here?
Again, this confusion seems to stem from the "land mass versus nation" confusion.

I was under the impression that many plantations were actually constructed by slaves and that the White House was constructed by slaves. And of course the railroads were constructed with a variety of nonwhite labor, including Chinese. But I suspect this was not what you meant by institutions.
If white men built “every meaningful institution” as you claim, perhaps it’s because they excluded non whites from participating at every level imaginable.



Right, of course America is no longer a white nation. Europe is no longer European. Modern America is a Jewish death cult based on nihilism and usury. That was never the claim

“Jewish death cult based on nihilism and usury.”??
WTF does that even mean?

smh
 
Top