What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
  • ICMag and The Vault are running a NEW contest in October! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Meet THC-O, a hemp-derived compound three times stronger than THC

G.O. Joe

Well-known member
Veteran
PS: When I ran it through our gas chromatograph, the THC-O-A (?) peak was to the left of the THC peakl

Not surprising, d9 acetate being much less polar without the free phenol. d8 acetate is even less polar.

Ketene reacts with acetone to make acetic anhydride.

Or acetone does not react with ketene. That patent is old news, Ac2O via acetic acid plus ketene from acetone having already been patented in 1922. Ketene production has several issues and is only suitable on a very large or very small scale. The chlorine mentioned earlier refers to patents from 1908 which are more convenient, and would likely be preferred in Afghanistan and Burma if it was actually difficult to get Chinese Ac2O there.

If anyone is wondering about smoking something with residual acetone also producing ketene, the yield of ketene from acetone without air at 600-750 C is small and the amount of residual acetone would also be small.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gry

Swamp Thang

Well-known member
Veteran
If anyone is wondering about smoking something with residual acetone also producing ketene, the yield of ketene from acetone without air at 600-750 C is small and the amount of residual acetone would also be small.
Yes sir I would be worried about ingesting exotic chemicals. I tend to err on the side of caution, generally speaking.
 

G.O. Joe

Well-known member
Veteran
Yes sir I would be worried about ingesting exotic chemicals. I tend to err on the side of caution, generally speaking.

There is however nothing exotic about acetone. You're exhaling some right now. It's in your blood because your body is making it.

Don't forget to worry about the bananas loaded with benzene, the rice packed with arsenic, and tea chock full of aluminum. And the terps! You've gotta love known carcinogen pot terpenes like pulegone.
 

Gray Wolf

A Posse ad Esse. From Possibility to realization.
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
It's doubtful that it's even possible for an acetate to be more potent, because it's likely that the acetate has to be metabolized to a free phenol to have any activity.

I didn't find it more potent, but it arrived almost instantly, suggesting it passed the blood brain barrier rapidly and whatever metabolizing was required happened almost instantly. So fast that the most common word out of the test subjects' mouth was, "Wow", and the second most common statement was, "That wasn't at all like I thought it would be.".
No.

Acids rearrange cannabinoids. Don't mix them with acids unless you want them to rearrange to a mixture of unknown composition. A limited amount of published work on acid reaction with d9 exists, particularly with heat and without alcohol. The reaction with tosic acid is known, and tosic acid is comparable to sulfuric acid.

I'm unaware of any literature where an acid is added to acetic anhydride and a cannabinoid, and the only time I've seen a base not added since the 50's is when the Cannabis Alchemy procedure using neat Ac2O is sort of followed and sort of analyzed (Science & Justice 1996; 36: 195-197).

The result of mixing acid with a cannabinoid will vary with temperature, concentration, time, and solvent. Predictable results will only happen when a procedure's product is fully analyzed and repeated exactly!

d8 is a common end product because it's more stable. Cannabinoids also rearrange with strong bases. These aren't a reaction of cannabinoids really, it's a reaction of terpenes. d9 and CBD can be seen as substituted limonenes. These rearrangements are as easy and complex in cannabinoids as in terpenes.

My idea of THC acetate came from reading D Gold, but Pharmer Joe was the one who came up with our formula, based on the formula for making aspirin from salicyclic acid. I called and asked him what the H2SO4 was for since we were starting with D-9 THC and he noted that it was a small amount and was a catalyst, not for isomerizing.

Whatever it makes was uniformly declared good stuff by us'n and all the students who tried it. As I noted it shifted the GC peak to the left but we had no GC standard that would identify it.

Better washing and drying is better. If you've mixed some of your Ac2O with water and shaken some, you've seen that it's not as reactive as it's made out to be. Takes a few minutes for the layer to disappear, depending on how much water is added. I'm not sure how much base treatment the ester can handle but in general I've noticed that esters have some resistance to hydrolysis with unheated base.

We continued to repeatedly wash with brine past when it was neutral, with little effect on shelf life.

I was able to get hold of the Ketene paper author Robert Strongin, who said that the experiments were run at 378C and the e-pens were run at 10 watts, which is right in the range of concern.

Propitiously he's promised to supply more information regarding their procedures, and has given me permission to share it on GWL blog site and here. More when I get the additional information:

Whether you are comfortable with Pharmer Joe's formula or not, it is a matter of record that it works well, but that leaves the question of whether it could work better with a different acid, though both issues are moot if the end result is another rash of pneumonia deaths.

I've seen movements to block D-8 Acetate as a way to get around current THC laws, but not yet for health concerns, so I sent the FDA special agent who contacted me regarding Vitamin E acetate an e-mail inquiring if they were currently looking at cannabis acetates and have yet to get a reply. I'll share it when I do:
 

Swamp Thang

Well-known member
Veteran
There is however nothing exotic about acetone. You're exhaling some right now. It's in your blood because your body is making it.

Don't forget to worry about the bananas loaded with benzene, the rice packed with arsenic, and tea chock full of aluminum. And the terps! You've gotta love known carcinogen pot terpenes like pulegone.
In addition to cultivating weed for personal consumption using purely organic methods, I grow my own bananas, acerolas, oranges, and borojoa out here on the Equator while studiously avoiding the use of agro-chemicals, so unless benzene is a naturally occurring chemical in any of those fruit varieties, I wouldn't expect to encounter a significant concentration of it in my normal backwoods diet. That said, my knowledge about the other additives you mentioned is limited though I imagine that even trace amounts of arsenic in any food item would have devastating and immediate effects on one's health.

All the same, this old dog remains unwilling to learn new tricks when it comes to entrusting my life to the product of science lab experiments conducted on cannabis when my good old-fashioned organically cultivated and cured bud checks all the boxes. Please forgive both my wariness on this subject of "improving" cannabis buds and the morbid curiosity that compels me to read every insight shared on this topic. My inquiring mind demands to know hehe.
 

Gray Wolf

A Posse ad Esse. From Possibility to realization.
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
Prof Robert Strongin came through. Here is both the study and the addendum with the scans: Vape temperature was 378C and the e-pen was set at 10-watts.
 

Attachments

  • Cannabis acetate and Ketene formation.pdf
    4.2 MB · Views: 183
  • Addendum.pdf
    285.7 KB · Views: 165
Last edited:

Gray Wolf

A Posse ad Esse. From Possibility to realization.
Mentor
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I did get a response from the FDA special agent, who thanked me and passed it up the chain. More when/if I hear more:
 

maddygobi

New member
Well, it is still poorly researched and unstable. I would not take the risk to take it in any form because I cannot be sure how my body will react to it.
I would not recommend it to anyone because experiments are sometimes not worth it. There are plenty of delta 8 products near you that you can use and stay relatively safe if you know your tolerance level and measure. You can use this one in many forms, but my favorite is vaping. It’s not as strong as smoking, but I still get somewhat high.
Also, it is legal in my state, and I don’t have to worry about the issues with the police constantly.
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
My understanding is that where we once had the JWH series, there are now a number of replacements for them some of which are
far stronger. Wonder if that is what is being sold in gas stations and the quick stop type places.
One of the more tragic things I recall having heard is that young military recruits use the stuff because it does not show in the piss tests.
 
Last edited:

Swamp Thang

Well-known member
Veteran
My understanding is that where we once had the JWH series, there are now a number of replacements for them some of which are
far stronger. Wonder if that is what is being sold in gas stations and the quick stop type places.
One of the more tragic things I recall having heard is that young military recruits use the stuff because it does not show in the piss tests.
Artificially manufactured THC is highly addictive and leaves users prone to psychosis. This is about as far removed from natural cannabis as is cocaine hydrochloride power from coca leaves. Too much of a good thing, or too great a concentration ingested, can be fatal. Oh, how I pine for the good old days when buds were grown organically, and neither spiked with chemicals nor "refined" to improve on perfection.
 

ChrisWalter

New member
The comparisons to conventional THC and its psychedelic effects make it quite fascinating. Your post provides a comprehensive overview of THC-O's history, including its initial study by the US military and its recent rise in production.
 

Stone

Active member
View attachment 18086322

In recent months, a synthetic compound derived from hemp called THC-O acetate—often referred to simply as THC-O (pronounced “THC oh”)—has quickly gained popularity among Americans who don’t have access to legal cannabis.

THC-O’s appeal lies in its potency and its legal status. Research has found that it’s roughly three times stronger than conventional THC. It has been called “the psychedelic cannabinoid” for its borderline hallucinatory effects. Because it’s derived from federally legal hemp, THC-O products are becoming increasingly popular in the states where consumers don’t have access to legal, state-licensed delta-9 THC products.

And now that delta-8 THC, its trendy cousin, has been outlawed in some states across the country and flagged by the DEA, THC-O’s star may rise even faster.

What is THC-O?


Although many of us only recently heard about THC-O, the US military began studying its effects as long ago as 1949; they observed it eroded dogs’ muscle coordination twice as much as conventional delta-9 THC.
Typically, acetic anhydride is added to delta-8 THC to produce delta-O acetate.​




THC-O didn’t appear on the DEA’s radar until nearly 30 years later. In 1978, DEA agents discovered a clandestine lab in Jacksonville, Florida, had combined a cannabis extract with acetic anhydride. But over the following 10 years, THC-O did not enter the illicit market. Since it didn’t seem to be a growing problem, the federal drug agency declined further investigation into the unusual compound.

Today the production of THC-O acetate is raising concern among some in the state-licensed cannabis industry. To generate the molecule, a highly-flammable compound called acetic anhydride is added to THC molecules. The process involves a series of extractions that begin with hemp, the low-THC cannabis plant that was made federally legal by Congress in the 2018 farm bill. First, CBD is extracted from raw hemp. Then delta-8 THC is extracted from the CBD. Finally, acetic anhydride is added to the delta-8 THC molecules to make THC-O acetate.

Experts say this process should only be done under controlled laboratory conditions, due to the health risks involved.
THC-O products like vape carts and tinctures are available for purchase online, both their legal status and their safety remain unproven.

Don’t make THC-O at home


“The process of making THC-O acetate is inherently dangerous,” the renowned cannabis researcher Dr. Ethan Russo recently told Hemp Grower. “This is something that’s got to be done in a technical lab with a vacuum hood [and] no exposure to humans.”
If you want to use delta-O, always buy, never DIY.​




Some THC-O retailers have echoed Russo’s warnings on their own websites. “Please don’t try to make THC-O on your own,” cautions the Honest Marijuana Co., an online seller of THC-O products. “The process requires special equipment and advanced training to get right. And volatile, flammable, and explosive chemicals are necessary. It’s not worth your life (or your home or your eyebrows) to do something that a lab can do better and safer. If you want to use THC-O, always buy, never DIY.”

If produced successfully, THC-O acetate resembles a thick brown liquid, similar to motor oil. As such, it can be consumed in vape cartridges, tinctures, and edibles.
Is THC-O safe to consume?


A lack of research and a profound lack of regulation based on actual data means that mysteries about THC-O acetate are prevalent.

Beyond its potency, researchers have concluded that THC-O acetate is a “prodrug,” meaning that the compound is not activated until it has been metabolized. It takes about 20 to 30 minutes to kick in.

James Stephens is a cannabis researcher and chemist. He’s investigated the effects of THC-O as part of his work for Iron Light, a cannabis product and brand consultancy based in Missoula, Montana. Stephens cautions that there are wide variations in product quality right now, early in the compound’s commercial emergence.

“If you’re using low-quality extract material and low-quality reagents you bought online from Alibaba or whatever, you’re likely to get way less pure of a product than if you’re using clean [and pharmaceutical-grade] reagents and do a lot of downstream purification steps,” Stephens told Leafly.

What’s in these products?


Stephens regularly reaches out to THC-O acetate producers online. When they send him testing results, he is alarmed by the lack of specificity. “It’s 10-15% unknowns in there. I ask, ‘What’s the rest of the stuff?’, and they say, ‘We don’t know’…That’s what usually shuts down the conversation.”

With any vape cartridge sold outside a state-licensed cannabis system, there’s always a concern about potentially toxic additives mixed into the cannabis oil. These thinning agents have caused serious health problems in the past, and there’s nothing to prevent unregulated companies from adding them without informing consumers.

Furthermore, Stephens noted that smoking the molecule in a vape cartridge invites another host of questions, since combustion can activate other chemical processes. “We just don’t know [what happens], but you can’t run around saying any of this stuff is safe,” he told Leafly.
It’s potent, so go slow


Stephens is likewise worried that adverse reactions to THC-O acetate could have larger repercussions for the legalization movement writ large. “My biggest fear,” he said, “is it just takes that first overdose to cause the equivalent of a satanic panic or whatever you want to call it.”

Overconsumption of traditional cannabis has never directly caused a death in humans. With a compound three times as potent as delta-9 THC, however, there’s a risk of consumers imbibing too much THC-O and suffering through some unpleasant effects. Of course, high-potency cannabis concentrates like dabbing oil, wax, and shatter have been legally sold for many years—so the risk of a bad trip with THC-O is all relative.
Is THC-O actually legal?


Well, it depends who you ask.

Producers of THC-O acetate products say they’re protected under the farm bill passed by Congress in 2018, because the molecule was derived from a chain of custody that began with federally legal hemp plants. But even they seem unsure. As Binoid, a top seller of the compound, as well as other derivatives like delta 10-THC and HHC, admits on the company’s own website, “That’s actually hard to say.”

As for their competitor Bearly Legal Hemp Company, their name says it all.

Some experts, however, believe the compound is not legal. They cite the 1986 Federal Analogue Act, which states that any substance analogous to a Schedule I drug—in this case, conventional THC—would itself qualify as a Schedule I drug.

But that argument could be similarly used to argue against the legality of delta-8 THC, or perhaps even CBD. It all depends on where the line between “analogous” and “non-analogous” is drawn.
State laws and regulations scrambling to catch up


As with products containing delta-8 THC and delta-10 THC, products with THC-O exist in the marginal legal space between hemp (which is legal nationwide) and cannabis (which is not). State regulators and legislators are currently playing whack-a-mole with the growing number of hemp-derived compounds, banning novel compounds only to see new derivatives take their place.

In legal adult-use states, cannabis regulators are by and large ignoring these hemp-derived compounds because they don’t fall under their strict regulatory purview. Local police and health authorities have more pressing matters, like violent crime and the coronavirus pandemic.

In the meantime, some state-licensed companies in legal states are becoming more concerned about unlicensed hemp-derived THC products undercutting their market and tarnishing the reputation of the cannabis sector with potentially unhealthy products.

Until THC-O and other hemp derivatives come under a state-regulated system, consumers will need to weigh the risks and benefits of these compounds for themselves.


SOURCE: https://www.leafly.ca/news/cannabis-101/what-is-thc-o



As for my myself, I have never stumbled across any THC - O.........but I'm now on the hunt to find some.

Has anybody reading this been lucky enough to try some......?????

:smoker:



RMS

:smoweed:
it is a lung killer for me.
Any thing acetylated -O I found extremely rough on lungs.
There are better ‘hemp’ cannabinoids.
THC-p if you want way potent and expensive.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top