What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

FDA's 4/20 contribution

G

Guest

self explanatory...what else did yyou expect?

http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2006/NEW01362.html

FDA Statement
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Statement
April 20, 2006
Media Inquiries:
FDA Press Office, 301-827-6242
Consumer Inquiries:
888-INFO-FDA



Inter-Agency Advisory Regarding Claims That Smoked Marijuana Is a Medicine
Claims have been advanced asserting smoked marijuana has a value in treating various medical conditions. Some have argued that herbal marijuana is a safe and effective medication and that it should be made available to people who suffer from a number of ailments upon a doctor's recommendation, even though it is not an approved drug.

Marijuana is listed in schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), the most restrictive schedule. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), which administers the CSA, continues to support that placement and FDA concurred because marijuana met the three criteria for placement in Schedule I under 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1) (e.g., marijuana has a high potential for abuse, has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and has a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision). Furthermore, there is currently sound evidence that smoked marijuana is harmful. A past evaluation by several Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and National Institute for Drug Abuse (NIDA), concluded that no sound scientific studies supported medical use of marijuana for treatment in the United States, and no animal or human data supported the safety or efficacy of marijuana for general medical use. There are alternative FDA-approved medications in existence for treatment of many of the proposed uses of smoked marijuana.

FDA is the sole Federal agency that approves drug products as safe and effective for intended indications. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act requires that new drugs be shown to be safe and effective for their intended use before being marketed in this country. FDA's drug approval process requires well-controlled clinical trials that provide the necessary scientific data upon which FDA makes its approval and labeling decisions. If a drug product is to be marketed, disciplined, systematic, scientifically conducted trials are the best means to obtain data to ensure that drug is safe and effective when used as indicated. Efforts that seek to bypass the FDA drug approval process would not serve the interests of public health because they might expose patients to unsafe and ineffective drug products. FDA has not approved smoked marijuana for any condition or disease indication.

A growing number of states have passed voter referenda (or legislative actions) making smoked marijuana available for a variety of medical conditions upon a doctor's recommendation. These measures are inconsistent with efforts to ensure that medications undergo the rigorous scientific scrutiny of the FDA approval process and are proven safe and effective under the standards of the FD&C Act. Accordingly, FDA, as the federal agency responsible for reviewing the safety and efficacy of drugs, DEA as the federal agency charged with enforcing the CSA, and the Office of National Drug Control Policy, as the federal coordinator of drug control policy, do not support the use of smoked marijuana for medical purposes.



so fuck 'em!
 

genkisan

Cannabrex Formulator
Veteran
But juicing up little kids on Ritalin and their parents on SSRI's is just fine...totally safe and perfectly ok.......



fucking evil Corpo-Nazi Pharma-scum and their political lackeys should all be beaten senseless and sewn into the carcass of a festering yak, to die drowning on the writhing masses of maggots therein.
Oh yeah....lets not forget the really bad hallucinogens and the glass-powder coated catheters.....



FUCK do I hate them!
 

bloodshot

Member
Oh yeah Marijuana has no medical +'s, and its also a halu drug...which the government describes it as also.
 

Ckayill420

Active member
"A growing number of states have passed voter referenda (or legislative actions) making smoked marijuana available for a variety of medical conditions upon a doctor's recommendation. These measures are inconsistent with efforts to ensure that medications undergo the rigorous scientific scrutiny of the FDA approval process and are proven safe and effective under the standards of the FD&C Act. Accordingly, FDA, as the federal agency responsible for reviewing the safety and efficacy of drugs, DEA as the federal agency charged with enforcing the CSA, and the Office of National Drug Control Policy, as the federal coordinator of drug control policy, do not support the use of smoked marijuana for medical purposes."

The reason that marijuana does not require the approval process is because its a fucking plant you morons.

Peace..............Clayill420
 

rsteeb

Active member
"A growing number of states have passed voter referenda (or legislative actions) making smoked marijuana available for a variety of medical conditions upon a doctor's recommendation.

Which makes "No accepted use in treatment" immediately null and void, unless I am too stoned to understand rational logic...
 

pipeline

Cannabotanist
ICMag Donor
Veteran
They are restricting their statements to discussing only smoked marijuana, which, like just about anything you burn, contains carcinogens in the smoke. There are many other ways to use cannabis: vaporize, eat, smoke miniscule amounts of collected resin, these dont seem to play into their views. There have been many studies done recently in europe, and Canada confirming the medical benefits of cannabinoids.

It says the DEA and NIDA, groups dedicated to upholding the Controled substances act, worked with them during a previous study. Of course they are going to say it has no medical value, its a schedule one drug in the controlled substances act. They should have had nothing to do with the medical studies.

It looks like the Cannabis freedom day for the US may be a little delayed now. There's only one thing to do to solve the situation. Change the controlled substances act.

LEGALIZE IT FOR ADULTS! WE JUST WENT THROUGH THIS SAME THING WITH ALCOHOL, HOW CAN THEY NOT LEARN FROM THEIR MISTAKES?
 
yea

yea

well Id like to see anyone in the FDA say marijuana has no medical uses when one of thier loved ones is dying of cancer and on chemo and cannot eat smokes a joint and can actually keep some food down. I mean jesus christ anyone who has ever smoked knows that at the least weed gives you the ability to eat. Lets just hope if they keep telling the public rediculous bold faced lies maybe more people will realize what a crock of shit it is.
 
I love it. They talk with some people who have at least half a brain (probably more like a whole on as far as the PHDs) and suddenly the FDA looks like a bunch of schmucks. Hmmm maybe people should start a fund to finance some of these doctors' works eh? Although even with all the hard evidence in front of the FDA and they would still make boneheaded statements such as the one prompted by the DEA on 4/20.

Come on! That is like the FDA saying that marijuana does not induce the munchies!
At the very least it helps cancer patients eat. I've had a lot of dealings with cancer. When someone goes from 180 -> 90 lbs because of chemo related side effects I don't think anyone would argue that whatever needs to make this person eat and keep it down needs to happen PERIOD.
 

Desiderata

Bodhisattva of the Earth
Veteran
You ALL get an A+ for hitting it on the head. "it's a fucking plant you morons,".........so fucking true.......cancer weight loss,..... who in their right mind can argue against that it is the "only" remedy time after time..............
 

rsteeb

Active member
Sent to FDA, Congresswoman Zoe

Sent to FDA, Congresswoman Zoe

Dear Rep. Lofgren,

I trust you have already joined Rep. Hinchey in responding to the FDA's
release of 20 April.

Thank you in advance, and am forwarding my own personal reply to the
FDA.

I am grateful for your support!

Sincerely, RSteeb

[posted on FDA website's 'comment form']
http://www.fda.gov/cder/comment.htm

Regarding the FDA's "4/20 'release'"

Cannabis-- whether ingested as tincture, baked into brownies, OR
inhaled after vaporization via Volcano OR combustion --certainly does
have medical efficacy. (Ask my Ophthalmologist, please!)

Unless, of course, FDA has an alternate explanation for cannabis'
inclusion [as ethanol-extracted tincture] in the pre-1938 US
Pharmacopoeia.

And an explanation for the existence of dronabinol, let alone Sativex--
aka "liquid marijuana"?

Some people have argued that adult consumers deserve equal rights to
use tobacco, alcohol OR cannabis. Which of these are more toxic? More
effective medically?

Are whiskey and cigars FDA-approved for any "treatment"?

The inclusion of cannabis in schedule I of the CSA is patently absurd
on its face. Only the "high potential for abuse" criterion is remotely
applicable-- yet cannabis is completely unique in its inability to maim
or kill either by overdose OR serial "abuse".

Furthermore, only "smoked 'marijuana'" contains toxins purported to be
carcinogenic-- and yet recent studies have shown cannabis-only SMOKERS
to have statistically negative cancer rates.

The prohibition of cannabis is perverse and counterproductive; it must
be swiftly abolished, for the benefit of us all.
 
Top