What's new

Trump thread part 2 (Or anything else we want to talk about that's ridiculous in politics today)

nepalnt21

FRRRRRResh!
Veteran

she's brave, i'll give her that... scrappy but she's missing the point that the gestapo aren't prioritizing criminals or illegals.. and i thought you didn't care whether they were illegal... also


Conclusion​

In summary, the assertion that illegal immigrants are more likely to commit crimes than legal immigrants is not substantiated by empirical data. Both groups generally exhibit lower crime rates than native-born citizens. To effectively address the root causes of crime among immigrants, it is imperative to implement supportive policies that enhance access to resources and promote community integration. By fostering understanding and collaboration, we can create a safer and more inclusive society for everyone.

FAQs​

Are illegal immigrants more likely to commit violent crimes?

No, studies indicate that illegal immigrants are less likely to commit violent crimes compared to native-born citizens, challenging the stereotype that associates immigration with increased violence.

What are the most common crimes committed by illegal immigrants?

The majority of offenses committed by illegal immigrants are non-violent, primarily related to immigration violations and minor infractions, rather than serious criminal activity.
 

nepalnt21

FRRRRRResh!
Veteran
People going to immigration hearings aren’t illegal?
i'm guessing sometimes, but of they're illegal and want to stay... makes more sense for them to skip, right? does to me, but maybe you've got some data to support your implied assertion?

many of the ppl being kidnapped by icetapo HAD THEIR CASES DISMISSED BY A JUDGE, now why would the judge do that if they're illegals?
 

Captain Red Eye

Well-known member
undermine public trust in our legal system?

It's reasonable not to trust the existing legal system.

It's forcibly funded. It's agents have immunity from many of their bad actions.

It features prosecuting, fining and jailing people for victimless crimes.

A legal system that is extortion funded and then has the temerity to call itself, "the justice system" shouldn't exist.

Also, there is no lock step mindset of the individual that make up "the public" therefore no "public trust" or single mindset. There never will be, which is a decent reason to abandon the unjust legal system that attempts to say they "represent all the people". If all the people have varying ideas, no single system could represent them all. Flush the turd, don't polish it.
 

nepalnt21

FRRRRRResh!
Veteran
It's reasonable not to trust the existing legal system.

It's forcibly funded. It's agents have immunity from many of their bad actions.

It features prosecuting, fining and jailing people for victimless crimes.
all true

A legal system that is extortion funded and then has the temerity to call itself, "the justice system" shouldn't exist.
what's a better idea? how do we get there?

Also, there is no lock step mindset of the individual that make up "the public" therefore no "public trust" or single mindset. There never will be, which is a decent reason to abandon the unjust legal system that attempts to say they "represent all the people". If all the people have varying ideas, no single system could represent them all.
i think this part undermines your point, everyone can never be completely happy at once, that's not a reason to abandon any and all states.

Flush the turd, don't polish it.
how? and please don't give me that "stop voting" silliness
 

nepalnt21

FRRRRRResh!
Veteran
^^^ yeah i thought we weren't supposed to use troops on american soil against americans...

anyway, also, @Captain Red Eye
to add to my post above... none of what you said is a good argument against my point.
 

audiohi

Well-known member
Veteran
in 2013 alone St.obama deported 438,421 people . how many has trump deported?
It’s hard when judges won’t let the president do what the people voted for. Nobody was complaining when Mr Sotero was going full blown fascist. View attachment 19216271
are-we-winning-yet-v0-69a5miao106f1.jpeg


Kinda like the tear gas at jan6th?
zero-tolerance-v0-wpixv34pr06f1.png
 

Captain Red Eye

Well-known member
all true


what's a better idea? how do we get there?


i think this part undermines your point, everyone can never be completely happy at once, that's not a reason to abandon any and all states.


how? and please don't give me that "stop voting" silliness

A better idea than extortion funding something is to fund things on a consensual basis where consumers have choices. For example grocery stores aren't extortion funded or coercive monopolies and that model works very well.

How to get there is to stop doing the thing that doesn't work (based in a forcible monopoly) and start doing the thing that does. (Based in free choices)

This is complicated by the populace largely being ignorant of the possible alternatives. That doesn't have to be the case, because it's held in place by the coercive monopoly now due to mercenary self-interest, lies and propaganda that makes it difficult, but not impossible to change it.

When people don't like a given grocery store or a given service supplier which operates in a competitive market people can "vote" with their feet.

We aren't "allowed" to do that now with many things due to the existence of the forcible monopoly.

A single forcible supplier of any kind of service that is forcibly funded is incapable of delivering justice in the same way a rapist is not who you would go to if you were seeking relationship counseling.

Voting to see which rapist is the least rapey isn't the same as free choice is it?
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top