sam owl is a good guy who ive talked to before, heres my take on his statement, dissected at a rational( not complete irrational dick move jumping on statements sense)So Owl, when you challenge me to show that you said butane is harmful and you say you never did, why do I prove that you did and your only response is that I have to be right all the time? You're just another member relying on his custom avatar and obnoxious manner to gain notoriety rather than relying on any intellectual position or ability. That's why you're able to advance anything as fact while constantly changing your mind. You ain't about shit.
his statement was in regards to the fellow saying butane and naptha extracts are the same when purged, regardless if butane isn't a carcinogen, there can still be remnants possible correct? Now, as you stated, naptha has liquid components such as toluene to my understanding ( never got into volatile chemicals and organic solvents much ) and the gaseous solvent would be easier to remove then the liquid carcinogens, if a single gas could possibly be left even after purging, is it not entirely possible to make a statement saying, hey if butane could remain in bho, couldnt naptha? in owls defense , now can we all just get along instead of bickering over a slightly rhetorical misunderstanding? either way im jetting out , and will not bother to respond, you can use my statement to mudsling all you want, but if you waste breath thinking i may return i shall nullify any action, even with terms of endearmentCan you qualify 100% that your purging method would do no harm to an already chronically ill patient ?
What method of testing do you implement to ensure the patient isn't ingesting known carcinogens ?