Its been my lay assumption that all things carried all possible outcomes inside them and that expression of these outcomes was dependent on whatever environmental triggers came about. As i’m writing this i realize that doesn’t really account for survival of the fittest and, well, any other observable fact, i mean, we wouldn’t have to worry about entropy or bottlenecking, etc then. It’s confusing to me though because if, “in a beginning” (no matter worldview) it starts with 2, they had to have had all things contained within them to get us to today, if that makes sense. Seems to me there must have been a much higher rate of active natural selection then there is now. So genetic possibilities would, over time flow like this<>. Where, sometime in history genetic expression (or better: flexiblity of adaptation) reached a peak and then started closing in up to now.
As i said, lay assumptions. Can someone edgykate me and shed my ignorance. Or at lesst point me towards a good simplified read on the the subject of genetics as it pertains to plant life. Seems to me without a real grasp of this my breeding wouldn’t consist of much more than following a recipe out of a book. I always wanna know the why’s of anything i get into. Hopefully someone here can decipher my tryptaddled understanding of things.
As i said, lay assumptions. Can someone edgykate me and shed my ignorance. Or at lesst point me towards a good simplified read on the the subject of genetics as it pertains to plant life. Seems to me without a real grasp of this my breeding wouldn’t consist of much more than following a recipe out of a book. I always wanna know the why’s of anything i get into. Hopefully someone here can decipher my tryptaddled understanding of things.