You seem to be coming in as a random guy on the internet yourself, and your only backup for your claims is "do some reading" and a direction to a search engine for an article about tobacco.
Actually I provided you with the exact name of the scientific paper.
"Effects of Chlorine on Growth and Quality of Tobacco" by Hiroshi Ishizaki and Tatsushki Akiya.
I could have just put a link into my post, but this is a forum - maybe some people will read this posts years later and all links will be dead by then.
But if you have the name of a specific paper, you can still google it.
There's a reason that a lot of fertilizer formulas explicitly state "chlorine free" or "low chlorine content".
While chlorine is beneficial for some crops, it's kind of devastating to others - for example crops, where the plant tissue gets burned.
People try to avoid chlorine in tobacco since the nineteenth century, and the principles of the matter are the same as with cannabis.
As soon as you have a certain amount of Cl- anions in your plant tissue, you have fucked up your quality.
And cannabis is a great accumulator, much more than tobacco.
But, besides tobacco, these negative effects can be seen on a lot more crops.
There is a negative correlation of shelf life, nutritional value, taste (etc) to a rising chlorine content.
You can give your plants all the chlorine you want, I just feel sorry for people who take such advice.
Because it can make them smoke schwag for months.
/Edit:
Thinking that biochemical processes don't apply to you because you're selling your bud is... a very special point of view.
The shitty bud in dispensaries has to come from somewhere too, I guess.
