What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Canada to decriminalize hard drugs in pilot study

flylowgethigh

Non-growing Lurker
ICMag Donor
Getting back to the original topic... I think it would be a good start if they just studied pilots and pot. No need to get into hard drugs.

It's a pilot study, right?
 

Ca++

Well-known member
Venezuelan pilot worth study
venezuela-filot.jpg

Straight up, she's a fighter pilot.

Spain
spanish-pilot-686x1024.jpg


USN
women-pilots2-735x413.jpg

Looks like the only one old enough to talk to
 

nono_fr

Active member
That's what they found in the original harm reduction studies in the nordic countries which were based on the idea of providing the addicts their daily fix as long as they agreed to participate in group therapy, volunteering, etc. It was successful as generally most people weened themselves off of opiates as they developed connections with people/communities around them as being high interfered with social interactions. Which is why I believe addiction needs to be treated as a health/poverty issue, not a criminal one. Mental health and poverty are the root of most addictions, it just makes sense to focus on the cause and not the symptoms to me.
In France the doctor delivers subutex (opiate) but there are no obligation of care in return . Users have to take responsibility for themselves to get help . Prohibition prevents a health response.
 

Somatek

Active member
It's been almost 20 years I think before Canada first studied harm reduction with the N.A.O.M.I. study (north american opiate as medicine investigation), since then advocates have had to fight the gov up to the supreme court to keep the first safe injection site open. The supreme court ruled the evidence of it's benefit was overwhelming and it was a violation of our Charter Rights to close it or prevent others from opening. It was only a year or so ago that the gov approved a study looking at supplying addicts with clean hydromorphone because of the epidemic of fentanyl overdoses (at points hospitals were running into naxolone shortages trying to treat all the overdoses) despite advocates shouting for action for years. Like you said and peoples comments illustrate prohibition and the stigma it creates prevents an effective health response and people that need help end up dying of overdoses while police forces and criminals get rich.
 

Rider420

Well-known member
"It ain't what you know that gets you into trouble, it's the things you know for sure that just ain't so." - Mark Twain

"A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he cannot learn in any other way." - Mark Twain

Two of my favorite quotes from Samuel Clemens.
Wow Samuel Clemens is Mark Twain real name I did not know that wink wink, FYI its Brian's go to phrase to make himself look smarter from the family guy. LOL funny dude!
 
Last edited:

Rider420

Well-known member
Getting back to the original topic... I think it would be a good start if they just studied pilots and pot. No need to get into hard drugs.

It's a pilot study, right?
Pot is a hard drug right? Along with MDMA and magic mushrooms and LSD? right all hard drugs. LOL too funny! BTW cannabis has been legal for three and a half years here in Canada without any real issues.
 

Rider420

Well-known member

Addiction specialist claim that cannabis is a hard drug! And that heroin is a safer choice! No shit the doc says I would rather see kids doing heroin then cannabis! Don't believe me watch the video.
 

moose eater

Well-known member

Addiction specialist claim that cannabis is a hard drug! And that heroin is a safer choice! No shit the doc says I would rather see kids doing heroin then cannabis! Don't believe me watch the video.
There are misguided nutbars in any profession.

A family member facilitates a methadone clinic, they don't screen for cannabis use in their clients, they don't disqualify for someone using cannabis, and they allow persons using other drugs to pursue methadone tx., etc., providing they're being honest about their efforts.

The program barely regards cannabis as an intoxicant, and I've heard one of the staff refer to Vicodin as 'the aspirin of opiates.'

Don't believe every red herring of a recording that some rag offers up. There are real, experienced, knowledgable, compassionate, and worldly people working in the harm reduction world. No reason to go see the dick-heads.
 
Last edited:

Rider420

Well-known member
"The question resurfaced in July when a new study was published in Lancet Psychiatry suggesting that it is, and that observation of cannabis addiction may be linked to an increased potency in marijuana worldwide."


Sorry buddy but the Narcs are coming out of the woodwork right now. They are making the claim that shots cause addiction but beer does not. Opps I mean less potent cannabis that you had to smoke a whole joint is fine but cannabis where you need only one toke will cause addiction.

Smoking a joint laughing my ass off.

BTW if you want to quit using drugs that's fine but what about the "heroin" drug users who like thier life and want to continue? FYI change heroin to cannabis and its you rather then them eh.
 

moose eater

Well-known member
"The question resurfaced in July when a new study was published in Lancet Psychiatry suggesting that it is, and that observation of cannabis addiction may be linked to an increased potency in marijuana worldwide."


Sorry buddy but the Narcs are coming out of the woodwork right now. They are making the claim that shots cause addiction but beer does not. Opps I mean less potent cannabis that you had to smoke a whole joint is fine but cannabis where you need only one toke will cause addiction.

Smoking a joint laughing my ass off.

BTW if you want to quit using drugs that's fine but what about the "heroin" drug users who like thier life and want to continue? FYI change heroin to cannabis and its you rather then them eh.
Lancet is a clearing house-type medical publication, not the original source of the claims or studies.

1999 Golden Anniversary Merck Manual (you know, those nasty Big Pharma boys and girls), stated that approximately 10% of regular cannabis users can become 'psychologically addicted.'

HUGE difference between psychological addiction and physical addiction, that was, right up until the private rehab community became so profitable.

But again, there's no reason to accept output from red-herring studies or editorials.

I'm a former (doubly) licensed mh clinician, and the harm reduction community -OFFERS- help (not forced) , much as the social services panels in Portugal do (yes, I'm familiar with the Portugese program, as well as the Liverpool Project in the early 1980s in the UK <shut down largely as a result of US pressure on the British Gov., despite lowering street crime in the area of the clinic by ~65%>, and supported both of the moves entirely).

I live in a redneck State run by corrupted, oil-money-bribed-and-addled Repugniks, and while the busting of larger (or more ignorant) black market growers continues without much press <likely to avoid blowback?>, the assholes in Juneau who typically would behave as you describe, and trust me, we watched them dance like that for nearly 50 years here, they haven't squeaked loudly about any such issues. The reality before everyone's eyes defies the hype.

But then, we have legal cannabis cafes now, and dispensaries up the ass, and we were quasi-legal all the way back to 1975 as a matter of the 1975 Ravin v. State Decision by then-Chief justice Rabinowitz, resulting from Alaska's Article 1, Section 22 Right of Privacy in the State's Constitution and Irwin Ravin's traffic stop that occurred while he was an attorney carrying a bag of ganja in his vest.

Back then, yeah, the hype you reference was alive & well, and thriving.. not just one or 2 articles. Now, reality is a bit more illuminating when contrasted to the bullshit.
 
Last edited:

Rider420

Well-known member
Back then, yeah, the hype you reference was alive & well, and thriving.. not just one or 2 articles. Now, reality is a bit more illuminating when contrasted to the bullshit.

LOL I've only quoted two articles. There are literally thousands more from just the past two years.
7 Million people die from tobacco another 3 million from alcohol and less then half a million from illicit or "hard" drugs. Yet most people still think that illicit drugs pose a greater danger to life then legal ones. Stupid is as stupid does.
 

moose eater

Well-known member
In " hard " drugs, it is the cutting products (rat poison - strychnine) that kill, not the opiate. Like the adulterated alcohol of the prohibition.
The findings of the Liverpool Project pilot program were that street cut, and more importantly, poor syringe hygiene, were responsible for the maladies their addicts were experiencing..

They taught folks how to maintain and properly clean syringes, and the abcesses, blood poisoning, etc., dropped off the charts.

They gave them clean synthesized heroin and cocaine at a rate of about $4/gram.

They were managed through job training, day-care assistance for their kids, etc.

And there were successes beyond the Church Lady's and Nancy Reagan's "Just say 'no!'" bullshit. (*To which Abby Hoffman had replied that Nancy Reagan telling addicts to just say no, was like telling (manic-depressive persons) to 'just be happy').

Imagine the Puritans in today's world funding classes to teach addicts to clean syringes properly! Yet, from the fiscal conservative side of the argument, it was FAR more cost effective than treating abcesses, blood infections, or buying coffins or urns.
 
Last edited:

nono_fr

Active member
Here an article on UK's heroin-assisted treatment : ‘Very promising’: UK’s first full heroin-prescribing scheme extended after reductions in crime and homelessness

‘Prison, increased sentencing, police crackdowns and all other efforts to break that cycle have failed,’ says police and crime commissioner
The UK’s first fully-fledged scheme to provide heroin users with a safe and legal supply of the drug has been extended for a further year, after showing “very promising results”.

Heroin-assisted treatment has been used successfully for decades in Switzerland, based in part on Britain’s long-forgotten model of heroin prescribing, and despite “impressive” UK trials, government funding for post-pilot schemes was removed in 2015.

But in Cleveland and Glasgow, police and local health experts have pushed in recent years for the creation of two of the UK’s first fully-fledged centres, both of which are now up and running, providing access to medical-grade diamorphine twice per day and to wider social support.

Campaigners celebrated the first “dramatic” results from Middlesbrough’s scheme on Wednesday, which found a vast reduction in re-offending rates and use of street drugs, and significant improvements in participants’ health and quality of life, including seeing those homeless at the outset placed in accommodation.
 

Rider420

Well-known member
The findings of the Liverpool Project pilot program were that street cut, and more importantly, poor syringe hygiene, were responsible for the maladies their addicts were experiencing..
Wow addicts in the UK must reuse needles? WTF Here in Canada you can get free needles anywhere and I mean anywhere!


Since June 2018, the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) has been rolling out a Prison Needle Exchange Program (PNEP) in federal institutions across the country to help prevent the sharing of needles among inmates and the spread of infectious diseases, such as HIV/AIDS and HCV.

Anyone can get free needles in Canada.


Similar safe supply programs are being implemented or considered in other places across Canada. Since 2019, Health Canada has funded 18 safe supply pilot programs.

"When we look at the number of overdose deaths, it should be zero. These are preventable deaths," author Christy Sutherland, MD, medical director at the PHS Community Services Society in Vancouver, which operates the SAFER program, told Medscape Medical News.

And this is what pisses me off that prohibition causes the toxic drug supply that kills most illicit drug users while NARCS use these deaths to justify prohibition. Catch 22.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top