rustlessbiscuit
Active member
You could do UV filtration and recycle you're water.
Yes, that's right. My friend ran tests for two years and concluded that plants don't absorb more than 32 mg/L. So giving them more than that is an unnecessary electrical expense. He also concluded that providing pure oxygen generates much higher growth and yields, practically as if they were receiving additional CO2.Oxygen to the root zone is a huge variable to growth rates, I've come to learn.
And one of our guys made their own DO probe with an arduino and atlas scientific.
Ok sweet, a inline UV filter would be an added bonus and easy for you to add with this dope setup.I'm already recirculating the water, for now using the same low-pressure mistblowers with a 400 L/h pump, but in the next one I'll install other diffusers that send the water directly downwards without spraying the roots. For now, I've placed the inlet on the same mistblower manifold with a non-return valve, and I'm currently programming it for 15 min/h so the nanobubbles are at the bottom of the buckets and the water is renewed.
View attachment 19192543
I'm using hypochlorous acid in the system, so the microlife issue would be impossible.Plants look great, can't wait to see the next run with the concentrator at veg, are we sure we are conclusive on 32mg/l? I wanna see 40mg/L
Otherwise, if 32mg/L is around the theoretical maximum for a reasonably sized Budding female, and needing/wanting no more, that's great.
I've been looking for this answer, thank you and you're other friend for their research results Data.
I'd have to go back and check but I think a different forum member ran up to 60mg/l with no negative affects, again, don't quote me on that, I'd have to double check.
@rustlessbiscuit @Ca++You're doing a great job. If you're excused, I'll stay and see how it goes. I find it very constructive and informative. We're still doing some last-minute tests with the generators to gather as much information as possible. For now, I can comment:
-In coco coir, I've used 32-34 mg/l of dissolved O² without any problems.
-In aeroponics, I'm maintaining a constant level between 15-20 mg/l, as I also recirculate 24 hours a day, and much of the O² is lost during this process. Therefore, I believe that increasing the O² further may not be very energy efficient.
View attachment 19192797
Nanobubbles vs no Nanobubbles water (they can be seen with laser light)
View attachment 19192798 View attachment 19192799
Sounds very interesting.You're doing a great job. If you're excused, I'll stay and see how it goes. I find it very constructive and informative. We're still doing some last-minute tests with the generators to gather as much information as possible. For now, I can comment:
-In coco coir, I've used 32-34 mg/l of dissolved O² without any problems.
-In aeroponics, I'm maintaining a constant level between 15-20 mg/l, as I also recirculate 24 hours a day, and much of the O² is lost during this process. Therefore, I believe that increasing the O² further may not be very energy efficient.
View attachment 19192797
Nanobubbles vs no Nanobubbles water (they can be seen with laser light)
View attachment 19192798 View attachment 19192799
Yes, that's right. My friend ran tests for two years and concluded that plants don't absorb more than 32 mg/L. So giving them more than that is an unnecessary electrical expense. He also concluded that providing pure oxygen generates much higher growth and yields, practically as if they were receiving additional CO2.
It's a shame I didn't have the oxygen concentrator at the start of the crop; everything would have gone much faster, but I'm already well prepared for the next crop. I'll also have to buy another pump to give me a little more pressure, since the nanobubbles currently enter at 32 psi, and anything higher would be better. I made a few mistakes in this crop, but nothing serious. I promise the next one will be perfect![]()
There are several benefits I've noticed, and although I haven't done side-by-side testing, I have noticed several benefits from using them, such as:Sounds very interesting.
What differences can you observe in a grow compared to your grows before the nano-bubbles?
It would be interesting to collect water from the emitters, and see the dissolved oxygen levels the plant see'sThe point of aeroponics is to use the atmosphere for oxygenation of the roots. Cycling the sprayers gives time for the roots to breathe.
Are you adding oxygen to the water or to the root zone?
I could see adding oxygen to the atmosphere to be extremely effective; if you are oxygenating the water do you have a side-by-side trial showing that it works against a control?
I’m intrigued since I’m planning a hydroponics setup for winter to offset the lack of humidity while using soil during the summer to prevent high reservoir temperatures.
Cheers!
I'm using hypochlorous acid in the system, so the microlife issue would be impossible.
I've asked the creator of the generator about nanobubbles. I hope he'll join the group here to better explain his tests and theories. I sent him the link to this post, and yes, I'm wrong about some things. I'm looking forward to him joining so he can offer better reasoning
A member on another forum, 90mg/l with o2 concentrator, fogponics.There are several benefits I've noticed, and although I haven't done side-by-side testing, I have noticed several benefits from using them, such as:
-Increased root growth
-Better nutrient absorption and transport
-Improved growth/biomass
-Apparently better flavor/terpenes and potency
-Less salt buildup in substrate
-Improved aerobic microlife
-Cleaner irrigation system
It's possible I'm leaving something out that I don't remember, but these would be the main benefits of using it. I thought I read that someone was using very high levels of O² in fogponic. I'd be happy to share information with that person honestly. Regards
Awesome.I'm using hypochlorous acid in the system, so the microlife issue would be impossible.
I've asked the creator of the generator about nanobubbles. I hope he'll join the group here to better explain his tests and theories. I sent him the link to this post, and yes, I'm wrong about some things. I'm looking forward to him joining so he can offer better reasoning than mine.
We use Athena Cleanse. But my friend @Sr de la luz also has a system like yours that creates hypochlorous acid.Awesome.
I'm using pool shock for my Hypochlorous acid.
Damn I'm so glad you kept them alive though.Good morning friends, yesterday we had some complications with the power in Europe, but luckily I managed to save the girls this way. I had two batteries in my electric drill charged and I managed to spray at 1 bar of pressure every so often until the batteries ran out. I continued spraying with the hand pump until the power came back on. The girls were without power for 12 hours and in a few hours the lights came back on. Crazy, friends!!! I have friends whose lights have shorted out and broken. Luckily, my electrical system has a surge protector and nothing was damaged
.
When the equipment is turned on, I have to perform EC correction since the plants don't tolerate it. I followed the Athena table, but they don't tolerate 2.5 ms.
View attachment 19193272