What's new

40,000 IN CO-OPS? NO - BUT REALITY IS STILL SOBERING

C

CANNATOPIA

California
-------
Do Redding's 17 medical-marijuana collectives really have 40,000 unique, individual members, nearly half the city's population? Almost certainly not.

Lt. Jeff Wallace, head of investigations for the Redding Police Department, surveyed the city's dispensaries to gather data for a Women's Fund forum on drug abuse this week. Adding up their membership rolls, he found, the city's 17 licensed collectives collectively have 40,000 members including, he said, 6,000 at the single largest.

The hole in the method is that while the city's medical-marijuana licensing ordinance says an individual can be a member of only one collective, that's a difficult law to enforce.

So there's a lot of duplication and overlap. Is the real number of collective members 20,000, 10,000 or 5,000? It'd be fascinating to know - and to know how many card-carrying Proposition 215 patients the north state area has - but given the questions of medical privacy and the legal reasons to keep quiet, it seems like any number is just a guess.

The eye-popping but dubious marijuana number aside, more scientifically rigorous data gathered by the Women's Fund, largely from state and local public health departments, reveal that Shasta County definitely has a drug problem:

From 2006 to 2008, Shasta County had the second highest rate of drug and alcohol use by pregnant women of all 58 counties in California.

From 2007 to 2009, the county's rate of drug-related deaths was three times the statewide rate, with 173 drug-related deaths in those years.

In 2010, more than 230 county child abuse cases were linked to drugs.

The county also has a higher than average rate of teen marijuana use, according to the California Healthy Kids Survey. That predates the 2009 explosion of storefront marijuana shops, and little data is available on trends since. The 2009-10 school year's survey at the Shasta Union High School District, however, saw a marked increase - as many as seven percentage points over past years, depending on the grade level - in reported marijuana use, a troubling early sign.

The collectives might well be fostering an even more entrenched culture of drug use, as critics fear, and the trends bear watching. But it's just as likely that we've simply seen a long-present side of Redding come out of the shadows.

Whatever the dispensaries' true membership, and whatever the ratio of bona-fide patients to abusers of the "medical" loophole, their proliferation is a symptom of our local drug problem more than its cause.
Link - http://www.mapinc.org/norml/v11/n346/a08.htm
 

Mrs.Babba

THE CHIMNEY!!
ICMag Donor
Veteran
ahhh Canna...we were just reading that in the local paper. The cops have no clue as usual, they think they can get a list of patients at the dispensaries, that will never happen. Whats even better are reading the comments ppl leave after the article, thats where you see the real ignorance of ppl and their still outdated view on cannabis.
peace

edit: and those numbers are bogus also, I work at a dispensary and sooo many ppl sign up that never come back, they are just passing thru or visiting freinds and relatives. There are very few regular customers.
 

Space Case

Well-known member
Veteran
Why doesn't this "Woman's Fun" (which is probably supported by anti-drug lobbyists) focus on real drug use instead of lumping medical marijuana use in with their "drug problems"?

Are they surveying Walgreens, too?
 
Top