Register ICMag Forum Menu Features
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > IC Magazine > USA Cannabis Scene: State By State > Michigan > Michigan Democratic Party endorses Medical Marijuana

Thread Title Search
Click to Visit Greenpoint Seeds
Post Reply
Michigan Democratic Party endorses Medical Marijuana Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2007, 04:47 PM #1
Devilock
Registered *bong* User

Devilock's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The best democracy money can buy
Posts: 248
Devilock will become famous soon enoughDevilock will become famous soon enough
Michigan Democratic Party endorses Medical Marijuana

On Feb 24th, at their annual state convention, the Michigan Democratic Party endorsed by unanimous acclimation a resolution stipulating,

"that licensed medical doctors should not be criminally punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and seriously ill people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has told the patient that such use is likely to be beneficial."

Considering the fact that the Democratic Party controls both the State House of Representatives and the Governor's Office, this exciting development signals a major sea change in the political climate in Michigan and gives much reason to be optimistic that common sense marijuana reform will soon follow in Lansing.

The full text of the resolution may be viewed here:

Resolution Opposing Criminal Penalties For Doctors
Who Prescribe And Patients Who Use Prescribed Medical Marijuana

WHEREAS, four Michigan cities (Detroit, Ann Arbor, Ferndale, Traverse City) have now overwhelmingly passed initiatives in support of medical marijuana; and
WHEREAS, public polls of Michigan residents have shown 70-80% in favor of medical marijuana; and
WHEREAS, the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine concluded, after reviewing relevant scientific literature including dozens of works documenting therapeutic value of marijuana, that “there are some circumstances in which smoking marijuana is a legitimate medical treatment”; and
WHEREAS, a scientific survey conducted in 1990 by Harvard University researchers found that 54% of oncologists with an opinion favored the controlled medical availability of marijuana, and 44% had already suggested at least one that a patient obtain marijuana illegally; and
WHEREAS, tens of thousands of patients nationwide, people with AIDS, cancer, glaucoma, chronic pain, and multiple sclerosis have found marijuana in its natural form to be therapeutically beneficial and are already using it with their doctors’ approval; and
WHEREAS, numerous organizations have endorsed medical access to marijuana, including the AIDS Action Council, AIDS Project Rhode Island, Alaska Nurses Association, American Academy of HIV Medicine (AAHIVM), American Anthropological Association, American Bar Association, American Nurses Association, American Preventive Medicinal Association, American Public Health Association, Americans for Democratic Action, Associated Medical Schools of New York, Being Alive: People With HIV/AIDS Action Committee (San Diego), California Democratic Council, California Legislative Council for Older Americans, California Nurses Association, California Pharmacists Association, California Society of Addiction Medicine, California-Pacific Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, Colorado Nurses Association, Connecticut Nurses Association, Consumer Reports magazine, Episcopal Church, Gray Panthers, Hawaii Nurses Association, Illinois Nurses Association, Iowa Democratic Party, Life Extension Foundation, Lymphoma Foundation of America, Medical Society of the State of New York, Minnesota AIDS Project, Minnesota Nurses Association, Minnesota Public Health Association, Minnesota Senior Federation, Mississippi Nurses Association, National Association of People With Aids, New Mexico Medical Society, New Mexico Nurses Association, New York County Medical Society, New York State AIDS Advisory Council, New York State Association of County Health Officials, New York State Hospice and Palliative Care Association, New York State Nurses Association, New York Statewide Senior Action Council, Inc., Ninth District Of the New York State Medical Society (Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess, and Ulster counties), Oregon Democratic Party, Progressive National Baptist Convention, Project Inform (national HIV/AIDS treatment education advocacy organization), Rhode Island Medical Society, Rhode Island Nurses Association, Test Positive Aware Network (Illinois), Texas Democratic Party, Texas League of Women Voters, Texas Nurses Association, Union of Reform Judaism (formerly Union of American Hebrew Congregations), Unitarian Universlist Association, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church, United Nurses and Allied Professionals (Rhode Island), Wisconsin Nurses Association, and Wisconsin Public Health Association; and
WHEREAS, a national CNN/Time magazine poll published November 4, 2002, found that 80% of U. S. adults “think adults should be able to use marijuana legally for medical purposes”; and
WHEREAS, a national Gallup poll released in November, 2005 found that 78% of Americans support “making marijuana legally available for doctors to prescribe in order to reduce pain and suffering”; and
WHEREAS, numerous other national public opinion polls have found substantial support for medical marijuana, including surveys conducted by ABC News, CBS News, the Family Research Council, and the Gallup Organization between 1997 and 2006; and
WHEREAS, since 1996, medical marijuana initiatives received a majority of votes in every state in which they appeared on the ballot: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington State; and
WHEREAS, since 2000, state legislatures in Hawaii, Vermont, and Rhode Island have enacted effective medical marijuana laws; and
WHEREAS, the May 14, 2001, and the June 6, 2005, United States Supreme Court rulings on medical marijuana dealt exclusively with federal law and do not affect the ability of individual states to allow patients to grow, possess, and use medical marijuana under state law; and
WHEREAS, the Ninth U. S. District Court of Appeals, in the case of Walters v. Conant, upheld the right of physicians to recommend medical marijuana to patients without federal government interference, and the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the federal government’s appeal of this ruling; and
WHEREAS, on September 6, 1998, after reviewing all available medical data, the Drug Enforcement Administration’s chief administrative law judge, Francis L. Young, declared that marijuana is “one of the safest therapeutically active substances known” and recommended making marijuana available by prescription; and
WHEREAS, the federal penalty for possessing one marijuana cigarette, even for medical use, is up to one year in prison, and the penalty for growing one plant is up to five years; and,
WHEREAS, the penalties are similar in most states, where medical marijuana users must live in fear of being arrested; and
WHEREAS, the present federal classification of marijuana and the resulting bureaucratic controls impede additional scientific research into marijuana’s therapeutic potential, thereby making it nearly impossible for the Food and Drug Administration to evaluate and approve marijuana through standard procedural channels; and
WHEREAS, seriously ill people should not be punished for acting in accordance with the opinion of their physicians in a bona fide attempt to relieve suffering;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that licensed medical doctors should not be criminally punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and seriously ill people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has told the patient that such use is likely to be beneficial.


Passed by unanimous acclimation, Feb 24, 2007, Michigan Democratic Party Annual State Convention, Detroit, MI


Copyright © 2005-2007 Michigan NORML

Peace and *bong*
Devilock is offline Quote


Old 03-14-2007, 05:34 PM #2
guest
Guest

Posts: n/a
Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you

just currious .. what part of that did Norml write?
Quote


Old 03-14-2007, 05:54 PM #3
Pufftillicum
Member

Pufftillicum's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 32
Pufftillicum is an unknown quantity at this point
Hell Yeah! Illinois and michigan! That would be toooo sweet! Wisconsin needs to get on the banwagon as well as Minnesota! I love it! I love it! I love it!
Puff
Pufftillicum is offline Quote


Old 03-14-2007, 06:21 PM #4
guest
Guest

Posts: n/a
It's gonna happen!!

I'm gonna live long enough to see it!!!!

Free at last free at last free at last
Quote


Old 03-14-2007, 07:24 PM #5
Chuckleberry
Comfortably Numb

Chuckleberry's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The other side
Posts: 182
Chuckleberry will become famous soon enoughChuckleberry will become famous soon enough
Yes indeed it looks like Michigan will soon be a safer place to live, I can hardly wait.

I am printing that off and taking it to my Dr. at my next appointment. See what she has to say and if she dont like it, then i will find another Dr.


Thanks for the info!
Chuckleberry is offline Quote


Old 03-14-2007, 08:19 PM #6
guest
Guest

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckleberry
Yes indeed it looks like Michigan will soon be a safer place to live, I can hardly wait.

I am printing that off and taking it to my Dr. at my next appointment. See what she has to say and if she dont like it, then i will find another Dr.
I just e-mailed it to my Ann Arbor doctor.

he got pissed at me the last time I mentioned mmj .. funny he was prescribing vicoden and dexidrine at the same time as being pissed about pot.
Quote


Old 03-14-2007, 10:28 PM #7
Guest
Guest

Posts: n/a
way to go big blue!!
Quote


Old 03-15-2007, 05:31 PM #8
guest
Guest

Posts: n/a
The Republicans are going to lose more popular percentages if they fail to support medical marijuana.

People are dying right now for lacking this medicine.
(my personal choice: go blind or break the law)
The Republican stand, currently, is that laws against marijuana are morally correct.

It's time to show that they really are the "party of compassion."
They need to come out right now and support Angel Raich and others like her.

The democrats have already realized that 80% of the public supports mmj and have grabbed the initiative by actively supporting it.

Do the Republicans wish to stand against 80% of the US voters?
They need to wake up fast.

It seems logical that I should be able to sue the federal government for medical malpractice.
They make such piss poor doctors and interstate commerce is no excuse to screw with my body.
Quote


Old 03-15-2007, 09:42 PM #9
marx2k
Senior Member

marx2k's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,242
marx2k has a spectacular aura aboutmarx2k has a spectacular aura aboutmarx2k has a spectacular aura aboutmarx2k has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pufftillicum
Hell Yeah! Illinois and michigan! That would be toooo sweet! Wisconsin needs to get on the banwagon as well as Minnesota! I love it! I love it! I love it!
Puff
I'm really REALLY surprised Wisconsin hasn't gotten onto the bandwagon yet. I would've thought it'd be in the forefront of the fight!
marx2k is offline Quote


Old 03-17-2007, 05:19 PM #10
guest
Guest

Posts: n/a
I just contacted every single Michigan senate republican via e-mail.
Here is their contact information:
https://www.senate.michigan.gov/gop/

I personized each e-mail and am calling them also.

Here is an example of what I sent them via e-mail:

Quote:
I have always voted republician.
I have taught my children to vote that way.
At every family gathering, I have urged everyone to vote republician.
At every opportunity, I have always urged people to vote republician.

There is one issue that I feel very very strongly about.
This one issue can and will cause me to work for the democrats:

https://www.minorml.org/Medical%20Mar...esolution.html

Please please please read this resolution very very carefully.

Do you stand with or against the will of 80% of the voters?

Is the republician party truely the party of compassion?

If republicians are against this issue, then I can no longer stand with
them.

Where do you stand? Where does your party stand?
They are always eager to know how to attract the majority of voters.

Last edited by peanutbutter; 03-17-2007 at 05:20 PM..
Quote


Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:02 PM.


Visit Sensi Seeds For all your Genetic Needs!


This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.