|
in:
|
|
| Forums > IC Magazine > USA Cannabis Scene: State By State > Michigan > Michigan Democratic Party endorses Medical Marijuana | ||
| Michigan Democratic Party endorses Medical Marijuana | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered *bong* User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The best democracy money can buy
Posts: 248
![]() ![]() |
Michigan Democratic Party endorses Medical Marijuana
On Feb 24th, at their annual state convention, the Michigan Democratic Party endorsed by unanimous acclimation a resolution stipulating,
"that licensed medical doctors should not be criminally punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and seriously ill people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has told the patient that such use is likely to be beneficial." Considering the fact that the Democratic Party controls both the State House of Representatives and the Governor's Office, this exciting development signals a major sea change in the political climate in Michigan and gives much reason to be optimistic that common sense marijuana reform will soon follow in Lansing. The full text of the resolution may be viewed here: Resolution Opposing Criminal Penalties For Doctors Who Prescribe And Patients Who Use Prescribed Medical Marijuana WHEREAS, four Michigan cities (Detroit, Ann Arbor, Ferndale, Traverse City) have now overwhelmingly passed initiatives in support of medical marijuana; and WHEREAS, public polls of Michigan residents have shown 70-80% in favor of medical marijuana; and WHEREAS, the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine concluded, after reviewing relevant scientific literature including dozens of works documenting therapeutic value of marijuana, that “there are some circumstances in which smoking marijuana is a legitimate medical treatment”; and WHEREAS, a scientific survey conducted in 1990 by Harvard University researchers found that 54% of oncologists with an opinion favored the controlled medical availability of marijuana, and 44% had already suggested at least one that a patient obtain marijuana illegally; and WHEREAS, tens of thousands of patients nationwide, people with AIDS, cancer, glaucoma, chronic pain, and multiple sclerosis have found marijuana in its natural form to be therapeutically beneficial and are already using it with their doctors’ approval; and WHEREAS, numerous organizations have endorsed medical access to marijuana, including the AIDS Action Council, AIDS Project Rhode Island, Alaska Nurses Association, American Academy of HIV Medicine (AAHIVM), American Anthropological Association, American Bar Association, American Nurses Association, American Preventive Medicinal Association, American Public Health Association, Americans for Democratic Action, Associated Medical Schools of New York, Being Alive: People With HIV/AIDS Action Committee (San Diego), California Democratic Council, California Legislative Council for Older Americans, California Nurses Association, California Pharmacists Association, California Society of Addiction Medicine, California-Pacific Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church, Colorado Nurses Association, Connecticut Nurses Association, Consumer Reports magazine, Episcopal Church, Gray Panthers, Hawaii Nurses Association, Illinois Nurses Association, Iowa Democratic Party, Life Extension Foundation, Lymphoma Foundation of America, Medical Society of the State of New York, Minnesota AIDS Project, Minnesota Nurses Association, Minnesota Public Health Association, Minnesota Senior Federation, Mississippi Nurses Association, National Association of People With Aids, New Mexico Medical Society, New Mexico Nurses Association, New York County Medical Society, New York State AIDS Advisory Council, New York State Association of County Health Officials, New York State Hospice and Palliative Care Association, New York State Nurses Association, New York Statewide Senior Action Council, Inc., Ninth District Of the New York State Medical Society (Westchester, Rockland, Orange, Putnam, Dutchess, and Ulster counties), Oregon Democratic Party, Progressive National Baptist Convention, Project Inform (national HIV/AIDS treatment education advocacy organization), Rhode Island Medical Society, Rhode Island Nurses Association, Test Positive Aware Network (Illinois), Texas Democratic Party, Texas League of Women Voters, Texas Nurses Association, Union of Reform Judaism (formerly Union of American Hebrew Congregations), Unitarian Universlist Association, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church, United Nurses and Allied Professionals (Rhode Island), Wisconsin Nurses Association, and Wisconsin Public Health Association; and WHEREAS, a national CNN/Time magazine poll published November 4, 2002, found that 80% of U. S. adults “think adults should be able to use marijuana legally for medical purposes”; and WHEREAS, a national Gallup poll released in November, 2005 found that 78% of Americans support “making marijuana legally available for doctors to prescribe in order to reduce pain and suffering”; and WHEREAS, numerous other national public opinion polls have found substantial support for medical marijuana, including surveys conducted by ABC News, CBS News, the Family Research Council, and the Gallup Organization between 1997 and 2006; and WHEREAS, since 1996, medical marijuana initiatives received a majority of votes in every state in which they appeared on the ballot: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington State; and WHEREAS, since 2000, state legislatures in Hawaii, Vermont, and Rhode Island have enacted effective medical marijuana laws; and WHEREAS, the May 14, 2001, and the June 6, 2005, United States Supreme Court rulings on medical marijuana dealt exclusively with federal law and do not affect the ability of individual states to allow patients to grow, possess, and use medical marijuana under state law; and WHEREAS, the Ninth U. S. District Court of Appeals, in the case of Walters v. Conant, upheld the right of physicians to recommend medical marijuana to patients without federal government interference, and the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the federal government’s appeal of this ruling; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 1998, after reviewing all available medical data, the Drug Enforcement Administration’s chief administrative law judge, Francis L. Young, declared that marijuana is “one of the safest therapeutically active substances known” and recommended making marijuana available by prescription; and WHEREAS, the federal penalty for possessing one marijuana cigarette, even for medical use, is up to one year in prison, and the penalty for growing one plant is up to five years; and, WHEREAS, the penalties are similar in most states, where medical marijuana users must live in fear of being arrested; and WHEREAS, the present federal classification of marijuana and the resulting bureaucratic controls impede additional scientific research into marijuana’s therapeutic potential, thereby making it nearly impossible for the Food and Drug Administration to evaluate and approve marijuana through standard procedural channels; and WHEREAS, seriously ill people should not be punished for acting in accordance with the opinion of their physicians in a bona fide attempt to relieve suffering; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that licensed medical doctors should not be criminally punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and seriously ill people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has told the patient that such use is likely to be beneficial. Passed by unanimous acclimation, Feb 24, 2007, Michigan Democratic Party Annual State Convention, Detroit, MI Copyright © 2005-2007 Michigan NORML Peace and *bong*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you
just currious .. what part of that did Norml write? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 32
![]() |
Hell Yeah! Illinois and michigan! That would be toooo sweet! Wisconsin needs to get on the banwagon as well as Minnesota! I love it! I love it! I love it!
Puff |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's gonna happen!!
I'm gonna live long enough to see it!!!! Free at last free at last free at last |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Comfortably Numb
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The other side
Posts: 182
![]() ![]() |
Yes indeed it looks like Michigan will soon be a safer place to live, I can hardly wait.
I am printing that off and taking it to my Dr. at my next appointment. See what she has to say and if she dont like it, then i will find another Dr. Thanks for the info! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
he got pissed at me the last time I mentioned mmj .. funny he was prescribing vicoden and dexidrine at the same time as being pissed about pot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
way to go big blue!!
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The Republicans are going to lose more popular percentages if they fail to support medical marijuana.
People are dying right now for lacking this medicine. (my personal choice: go blind or break the law) The Republican stand, currently, is that laws against marijuana are morally correct. It's time to show that they really are the "party of compassion." They need to come out right now and support Angel Raich and others like her. The democrats have already realized that 80% of the public supports mmj and have grabbed the initiative by actively supporting it. Do the Republicans wish to stand against 80% of the US voters? They need to wake up fast. It seems logical that I should be able to sue the federal government for medical malpractice. They make such piss poor doctors and interstate commerce is no excuse to screw with my body. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,242
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I just contacted every single Michigan senate republican via e-mail.
Here is their contact information: https://www.senate.michigan.gov/gop/ I personized each e-mail and am calling them also. Here is an example of what I sent them via e-mail: Quote:
Last edited by peanutbutter; 03-17-2007 at 05:20 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|