Register ICMag Forum Menu Features
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > Marijuana Growing > Cannabis Growing Questions > Calculations for Common Nutrient Formulas

Thread Title Search
Visit the Weed Seed Shop for Great Genetics!
Post Reply
Calculations for Common Nutrient Formulas Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-25-2006, 06:03 AM #1
ShroomDr
CartoonHead

ShroomDr's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Higher Than You
Posts: 3,457
ShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to behold
Calculations for Common Nutrient Formulas

I have decided to make a thread Listing the actual fertilizer amounts in common plant food formulas.

Often the bottles list X/Gal will yield Y ppm. This is very inaccurate, because of the different scales associated with ppm. I have seen plenty of people get burned (and burn there plants) using the bottle listed ppm.

So how do I know which scale the manufacturer is using?

I don't, so lets forget that part of the bottle.


Let us also forget about Vegging at xxxxppm and flowering at xxxx ppm. Some products do not register on a ppm meter and some register higher than the listed NPK (for example, Liquid Karma raises the ppm a lot, compared to the actual amount of fertilizer/Food in contains. Most of the reading is from the 'Non-Plant Food Ingredients' Humic Acid, Aloe Vera, etc). So saying i want to flower at 1500ppm is sort of rediculous, because Cal-Mag+ and Liquid Karma, will add a lot more to your ppm without adding much to your 'feeding' program.


So instead of that, I will look else where and shoot for Lucas/pH's Formula
N100 P100 K200 Mg60

I will focus on the liquid weight of the product (ml/g), the Guaranteed Analysis, and the listed application rate, to derive the true NPK of the fertilizer. All three are normally listed on the bottle, and there is a handy little calculator for just this task.
https://www.angelfire.com/cantina/fou...s/profiles.htm
Now I can easily see what the real profiles of my nutrients.



Once again, just to reiterate, an N 50 P 25 K 25, is a TRUE ppm of 100, but a 100 ppm reading will not equal N 50 P 25 K 25 (or some other combo equaling 100). Not all elements will register on a meter. SO IT IS A MUST TO UNDERSTAND YOUR NUTRIENT BOTTLES.



Here I will list the Product Name, its' listed NPK (some formulas change {The AN Overdrive, i just purchased, is the old Formula}), its ml/g weight, and either a 10ml or 5ml per Gal application rate(for easy math).

Pure Blend Pro Grow
3-1.5-4

1.0625 grams/ml
@10ml/Gal
N 84
P 18
K 93
Mg 14
Ca 28
Fe 0

Pure Blend Pro Bloom Hydro
2.5-2-5

1.0625 grams/ml
@10ml/Gal
N 70
P 24
K 116
Mg 14
Ca 28
Fe 0

Pure Blend Pro Bloom Soil
1.5-4-5

1.0625 grams/ml
@10ml/Gal
N 42
P 49
K 116
Mg 14
Ca 28

Botanicare Hydroplex
.5-4-10

1.1966 grams/ml
@5ml/Gal
N 8
P 28
K 131
Mg 8
Ca 0
Fe 0
S 8

Botanicare Liquid Karma
.1-.1-.5

.98958 grams/ml
@10ml/Gal
N 3
P 1
K 11
Mg 0
Ca 0
Fe 0

Botanicare Sweet
0-0-0

1.065 grams/ml
@10ml/Gal
N 0
P 0
K 0
Mg 42
Ca 0
Fe 1.68
S 56

Botanicare Cal Mag Plus
2-0-0

1.0208 grams/ml
@10ml/Gal
N 54
P 0
K 0
Mg 32
Ca 86
Fe 2.7

Millennium Cal Mag Max
0-0-0

1.12632 grams/ml
@5ml/Gal
N 0
P 0
K 0
Mg 15
Ca 60
Fe 0.744
Mo 0.045
Cu 0.045

Millennium HyPhos
1.8-7.5-1.8

1.0642grams/ml
@5ml/Gal
N 25
P 46
K 21
Mg 0
Ca 0
Fe 1.40
Mn 0.28

AN Overdrive Older Version, and i had to weigh the liquid myself, since the weight is not listed
1-3-4
1.162 grams/ml
@10ml/Gal
N 31
P 40
K 102
The ingredients list Magnesium Phosphate and Magniesium Sulfate, so there is defiently some Mg and S in this mix, but its not listed, and as another side note, no Ca listed anywhere.



Don't throw out your ppm meter, you can still track the ppm(or preferable the EC, now that you know the differece) up or down, just worry more about the day to day, up or down change, and less about a specific number.

Last edited by ShroomDr; 12-03-2006 at 11:18 PM..
ShroomDr is offline Quote


Old 11-25-2006, 07:33 AM #2
meduser180056
Member

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 962
meduser180056 will become famous soon enoughmeduser180056 will become famous soon enoughmeduser180056 will become famous soon enough
Great information here.

I too follow the Lucas formula using the Botanicare line of nutes.

I use the soil bloom formula throughout the entire life cycle of the plants[veg+flower] up until flush. I don't have N deficiency because I supplement it with the Cal-mag which is needed to raise calcium and magnesium levels up to the 120/70 guideline.

I've found that 15ml/gal of the PBPB soil with 10 ml/gal of Cal-mag plus you have a very complete fertilizer that meets the Lucas formula requirements. This will register around 1.6 PPM. So I always shoot for 1.6 PPM as my baseline full strength mix.

Now I also use Liquid karma, Sweet, and Silica Blast too. The LK and Sweet make the EC shoot up considerably, but like ShroomDr said, it's not because they contain alot of NPK or other nutes. It's because of the sugars in Sweet and the goodies in LK. This stuff is fine to add on top w/o causing burn. My full strength mix comes out to 2.4 EC because of all those extra goodies, but the plants don't burn. They love the Sweet and LK.

If I didn't use the Nutrient calculator I would be scared to use Sweet and LK cuz of the EC spike, but now I know better.

Last edited by meduser180056; 11-25-2006 at 07:35 AM..
meduser180056 is offline Quote


Old 11-25-2006, 08:05 AM #3
inflorescence
Banned

inflorescence's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,341
inflorescence has a spectacular aura aboutinflorescence has a spectacular aura aboutinflorescence has a spectacular aura aboutinflorescence has a spectacular aura aboutinflorescence has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by meduser180056
The LK and Sweet make the EC shoot up considerably, but like ShroomDr said, it's not because they contain alot of NPK or other nutes. It's because of the sugars in Sweet and the goodies in LK. This stuff is fine to add on top w/o causing burn. My full strength mix comes out to 2.4 EC because of all those extra goodies, but the plants don't burn. They love the Sweet and LK.

If I didn't use the Nutrient calculator I would be scared to use Sweet and LK cuz of the EC spike, but now I know better.
This has confused me for some time. I also heard organics wouldn't really register on a ppm meter because they don't really conduct ec, so if sweet raises the ec because of sugar (organic) and LK because of the other organic stuff in there why does the ec raise on the meter if these supposedly organic molecules can't conduct ec?

Last edited by inflorescence; 11-25-2006 at 08:06 AM..
inflorescence is offline Quote


Old 11-25-2006, 08:25 AM #4
ShroomDr
CartoonHead

ShroomDr's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Higher Than You
Posts: 3,457
ShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to behold
I just moved everything to the top thread.

Last edited by ShroomDr; 12-03-2006 at 11:19 PM..
ShroomDr is offline Quote


Old 12-04-2006, 11:34 PM #5
ShroomDr
CartoonHead

ShroomDr's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Higher Than You
Posts: 3,457
ShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to beholdShroomDr is a splendid one to behold
BUMP.

would any old growers like to speak as to why no Flowering Boosters have Ca in the mix?

None in hydroplex, Overdrive, Bud Blood, or Sweet.

It is a pattern that i noticed a few months ago, yet i do not understand why.

do plants late in flowering not need Ca?
ShroomDr is offline Quote


Old 12-05-2006, 12:05 AM #6
sproutco
Banned

sproutco's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,645
sproutco has a spectacular aura aboutsproutco has a spectacular aura aboutsproutco has a spectacular aura aboutsproutco has a spectacular aura aboutsproutco has a spectacular aura about
Calcium + phosphate = precipitates form. This would clog a fertilizer injector. So alot of ferts leave calcium out. Flowering plants do need calcium. Growers usually have more than 1 injector. Maybe one just for calcium like calcium nitrate.

Last edited by sproutco; 12-05-2006 at 12:07 AM..
sproutco is offline Quote


Old 12-05-2006, 09:38 PM #8
payn4school
running for president

payn4school's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 148
payn4school is on a distinguished road
I did have a long detailed post written but then comp crashed, so now Im pissy. What I was saying is that your gram/ml values are wrong for every product. Here is a quick example:
Pureblend pro soil
2.24 net weight and 960 mls
2.24 convert to grams is 1,016.0469087
1,016.0469087/960 is 1.0583821965625

HOLD ON !@#!@#!@
The values are different depending on the size of the bottle, that should not be but it is. My liter of pbp soil has a gram per ml weight of 1.0583821965625 but my 2 and a half gallon has a gram/ml of 1.289156842. Thats a big fuckin difference. Thats such bullshit, botanicare is slackin and still no return phine call from the techs.

There is some monkey business goin on here

Glad I did as well as I did with all the bull shit of this product
day 44

payn4school is offline Quote


Old 12-05-2006, 09:48 PM #9
Guest
Guest

Posts: n/a
I follow the directions on the bottle of PBP Bloom Soil and add 1tblsp molasses, 1 tsp Tiger Bloom, 1tblsp Sensizyme per gallon. My babies look fine. No burning. I have even gone as far as 3x that amount of tiger bloom without burning. Or 3x Monster Bloom dry instead of tiger bloom. No burns... Am I just lucky?
Quote


Old 12-05-2006, 10:47 PM #10
payn4school
running for president

payn4school's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 148
payn4school is on a distinguished road
I dont have any burning, that is not the point

Contacted AmerAgro again and told the tech of this and he seemed concerned. didnt have an answer , said he would have to talk to the botanists or chemist or some shit.

still waiting on a response...
payn4school is offline Quote


Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Click to Upgrade your account


This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.