|
in:
|
|
| Forums > IC Magazine > USA Cannabis Scene: State By State > California > San Francisco Making Marijuana Law Enforcement's Lowest Priority | ||
| San Francisco Making Marijuana Law Enforcement's Lowest Priority | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Webmaster Medical Marijauna Patient & Activist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Back Home In "Legal Maine!" :)
Posts: 54
![]() |
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
I am pleased to announce that the City and County of San Francisco has just joined the growing list of cities that are making marijuana offenses law enforcement's lowest priority today, in order to enable police to concentrate on violent and serious crime. This was achieved by a coalition of activists and organizations in conjunction with supportive and sympathetic supervisors. This brings the total to six cities up and down California that have either passed ordinances or ballot initiatives to stop the arrest of adults for marijuana offenses (Oakland, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Santa Monica, Santa Barbara, and West Hollywood). This ordinance effort was spearheaded by Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who offered to sponsor an ordinance to save us the expense of an initiative. It was then handed over to Supervisor Tom Ammiano to take the lead, and co-sponsored by Supervisors Jake McGoldrick and Chris Daly, along with Mirkarimi. By an 8-3 vote, the full board of supervisors passed the measure, based on the Santa Cruz' Measure K but tailored to fit San Francisco's political environment. A second confirmatory vote should make it final next week. This ordinance was supported by all the supervisors, except Ma, Elsbrend, and Alioto-Pier. There was some opposition by the Fair Oaks Community Coalition, a neighborhood group that became known during the medical cannabis dispensary ordinance effort (in opposition). At yesterday's committee hearing, while they opposed this ordinance, several members of this group came out in support of taxing and regulating cannabis at the state and federal level. The head of the narcotics division was satisfied with their input into the initiative language, and said that the ordinance would not tie their hands. So, we did it, again! Thanks are in order to the supervisors who came on board, especially Sup. Tom Ammiano and his aide, Zach Tuller. Congratulations to the team that made this possible! California is leading the charge to opt out of Bush's war on marijuana! Hooray for San Francisco Values!
__________________
Stay Safew & Stay Well Everyone Chris Kenoyer. Owner, MMJ Patient & Online Medical Marijuana Patients Advocate, Online News Journalist OnlinePot The Humongous Medical Marijuana & Cannabis Resource 10,000+ Pages The Reefer Madness Teaching Museum .org Maine Patients Coalition.org Any Patients Needing Help With Any Online Problems, Please Email Me Anytime At OnlinePot @ Online Sick Medical MMJ Patients MOM Providers |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
that is fantastic news...someone correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Hollands laws are simliar. Cannabis is still illegal but it is considered the lowest priority so no one bothers. Is that right?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 238
![]() |
one step at a time ROCKIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Bodhisattva of the Earth
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: N. Cal
Posts: 9,535
![]() |
Thats what im talking about mang
__________________
(Medical Patient In Compliance) Nam myoho renge kyo !! Mugi wasshin your bud babba Peace/ Be here now Babba's Farm L.L.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
You will not be forgotten
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: stuck between a stone and a high spot
Posts: 2,283
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
one city at a time, hopefully will spread to elsewhere when they see the results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20
![]() |
change can only come from the bottom up. Copy the language and of the san francisco resolution and ask your local town board or city council to debate it; in most places these people get so little participation from the public that they won't be able to ignore you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|