|
in:
|
|
| Forums > Talk About It! > Security & Legal Issues > Indoor/outdoor busts per state 2005 | ||
Post Reply  |
| Indoor/outdoor busts per state 2005 | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
10-22-2006, 05:21 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 528
 |
Indoor/outdoor busts per state 2005
Posted in another thread but thought it might belong here.
https://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t4382005.pdf LOOK at CALIFORNIA STATS..HOLY SHIT California-Indoor grows seized per month: 47  Rhode Island-Indoor grows seized per month: 0  
|
|
|
|
10-22-2006, 05:24 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 528
|
Not sure if these stats are just for DEA busts or also include all busts (local pd, state...).
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2006, 06:53 AM
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,341
|
Look at the "value of assets seized" between CA and IN.
IN took in ~half the assets as CA yet only 1/57 the "total plants cultivated". This proves that some states are only in it for the money they can seize. How can congress look at those stats and not see that it's all about asset forfeiture for some states. Those states asset forfeiture laws need to be repealed because of the clear conflict of interest. I mean you don't get asset forfeiture for catching a rapist so states like IN are gonna focus more on MJ then real crime, a clear conflict of interest. Also, a third of ALL assets seized from the entire united states were from CA.
Last edited by inflorescence; 10-22-2006 at 06:55 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
10-22-2006, 07:54 AM
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thats how we do it in KY and cali bitches!!!
|
|
|
|
10-22-2006, 08:00 AM
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,341
|
I think I'm misreading this cause Texas says 10,000 total plants eradicated but 60,000 lbs bulk processed MJ. Isn't that 6 lbs per plant (on average)
Maybe the bulk processed MJ includes all the mexi brick kilos brought up and stored in Texas and the bulk figure means total poundage, not necessarily just from the eradicated plants. I guess that's why texas only seized $31,000. They musta busted one trailer full of approx 50,000 lbs. lol Last edited by inflorescence; 10-22-2006 at 08:04 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
10-23-2006, 12:52 AM
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Maybe I missed something, but I think that a 'per capita' count of busts and amounts of seizures would mean a whole lot more in some ways.
Alaska and Wyoming have populations nearly small enough to fit into a coupla' row boats (**yes, that was exageration), while New York and California have an entire country's population squeezed into various sizes of geographic packages. Cooking the numbers down to 'per 100,000 ppopulation' would make an easier comparison. Did they already do that, and I simply missed it?? moose eater Last edited by moose eater; 10-23-2006 at 03:27 AM.. |
|
|
|
10-23-2006, 03:18 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: amsterdamned
Posts: 271
|
Quote:
How do you think the d ea still makes a living. Seizing assets and cash/bankaccounts from "drug dealers" is a big chunk of PIG revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2006, 05:05 AM
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,183
|
on the # of indoor bust, hard to believe AL=5, GA=1 but FL had 384, that just seems strange to me
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2006, 06:13 AM
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i gotta move to montana
1 outdoor bust 
|
|
|
|
10-23-2006, 06:41 AM
|
#10 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,341
|
Quote:
A lot of people I know agree with me that mid states like IN, etc. have totally crazy asset forfeiture laws and then I try to tell them that CA is just as bad, they always say, "nah, CA has revised it's asset forfeiture laws so CA is no where near as bad as the pre-historic forfeiture laws like in IN." Well guess what CA, think again! |
|
|
|
|
| Post Reply |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:14 PM.
