[Limeygreen]

Technically you are not paying for the prescription, you're paying for the appointment. You are not guaranteed to get the prescription only to have an allotted time with the doctor to discuss your situation.

[Maple_Flail]

Originally Posted by Big_Al's_Buds

You dont require any special permissions from a landlord no matter the building type. But if they find out they will probably make a big deal about it.

Annex A1-A2

A2. Site Owner's Consent
You can complete this section with the information of the site owner, but the site owner will need to sign and date this section.

The personal information is to be provided for the site owner. In addition to their name, this includes their address and phone number.

The site owner will need to read the statement, print your name (as the person they are giving consent to) on the line and then sign and date the section.

If the property is co-owned, the co-owner will also need to provide their information and to read the statement, print your name (as the person they are giving consent to) on the line and then sign and date the section.

This section is optional and does not have to be completed if there is no need. However, if it is completed, please note that unless a field is marked if applicable, the information must be provided. If the information is not provided, the registration form will be deemed incomplete. It will not be processed and will be returned to you.

Originally Posted by blastfrompast

6 months for DG paperwork 30g/day licence..

Made me jump thru a couple extra hoops that stretched it out an extra 3 weeks...

FYI if you DG, include photocopy of Drivers licence, your Health card, and some proof you own the property (tax bill)...

there is also this from another thread, its safe to assume they check who own on DGs, why wouldn't they on PPL?

[Bjorn to farm.]

I have a couple rental properties.
I’m ok with a garage grow but it would have to be legal and my tenants would have to pay the up charge on my insurance, if I could find some

[Maple_Flail]

Originally Posted by Bjorn to farm.

I have a couple rental properties.
I’m ok with a garage grow but it would have to be legal and my tenants would have to pay the up charge on my insurance, if I could find some

if its done safely, and not by a hack it shouldn't affect Insurance rate in a significantly noticeable effect

however its one of the topics im not keeping up with yet, i want the dust to hit to see what legislation on the rec side there will be for homegrow protection for landlords.

however that being said, as long as you the landlord were not trying to make a profit off that insurance bump and charge it flat. I'm sure the majority of legitimate PPL end users would have no issue with increased costs (it doesn't take much more than a peanut to realize if you adding lights your will be paying more electricity, insurance and security isn't a far step from that IMHO)

I foresee more issues on rec side then Med for a landlord. as Such clauses aren't in leases kuz they are currently illegal without medical right, that will change automatically on a date, while you have to wait for your next lease renewal to change (unless things change in the law), ergo no way to evict and unruly dangerous grower if they don't have a new lease

[Big_Al's_Buds]

Originally Posted by Maple_Flail

Annex A1-A2





there is also this from another thread, its safe to assume they check who own on DGs, why wouldn't they on PPL?

A2. Site Owner's Consent
You can complete this section

Key word in the there is "CAN". If you had to complete that section they would say its mandatory.

I think you are right though about the DG needing to prove some sort of ownership, and clear criminal past for that record.

[Big_Al's_Buds]

Originally Posted by Bjorn to farm.

I have a couple rental properties.
I’m ok with a garage grow but it would have to be legal and my tenants would have to pay the up charge on my insurance, if I could find some

So do I and wouldnt want them growing in there. Tenants fuck up my houses as is with out growing. Bottom like is MOST tenants dont give a shit about your house. Thats just part of the game. Maybe with advanced permission, special insurance, and a huge security deposit Id let it fly, but its just asking for trouble when you could just get new tenants that wont grow. Bottom line is whats in it for you to risk it?

[Maple_Flail]

Originally Posted by Big_Al's_Buds

A2. Site Owner's Consent
You can complete this section

Key word in the there is "CAN". If you had to complete that section they would say its mandatory.

I think you are right though about the DG needing to prove some sort of ownership, and clear criminal past for that record.

it states it can be skipped if not needed. By skipping it if you are needing it you are giving yourself grounds for eviction (and refusal). not a gamble I'd like to take when there is legitimate health reasons and ergo health rights.

what is the point of a grow licenses if you don't have a place to live let alone grow.

Also, just because YOU as a landlord say no, doesn't mean Tribunal can't over turn it for legitimate medical right or any thing they find unjust in your stipulations can also be struck. AGAIN only on medical basis.

if the tenant is a douchebag and known to be a douchebag ya give him no quarter. But Please don't paint all as dregs of society, atleast conceded you occasionally hear of the good tenant that doesn't fuck your shit up, if you haven't atleast encountered one yourself.

[diffusing]

i think if you are living there (your residence) you don't need to inform the landlord for your personal grow. if you don't live at the property you plan on growing in you need the permission of the owner..

something like that anyway

[Bjorn to farm.]

Originally Posted by diffusing

i think if you are living there (your residence) you don't need to inform the landlord for your personal grow. if you don't live at the property you plan on growing in you need the permission of the owner..

something like that anyway

A grow would invalidate my insurance, not cool.

[Gmack]

I noticed the wording has changed this year regarding grows for my policy. It now says illigal grows or criminal activity will invalidate the policy where as before it said something to the effect any grow would invalidate the policy.