Register ICMag Forum Menu Features
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > IC Magazine > USA Cannabis Scene: State By State > Colorado > New Colorado caregiver limits

Thread Title Search
Click to Visit Mars Hydro for Growroom Lights and Tents
Post Reply
New Colorado caregiver limits Thread Tools
Old 07-26-2017, 08:24 PM #1
macdiesel
Member

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 296
macdiesel has a spectacular aura aboutmacdiesel has a spectacular aura aboutmacdiesel has a spectacular aura aboutmacdiesel has a spectacular aura about
New Colorado caregiver limits

Can anyone link me to an official law of the new Colorado caregiver limits I've been hearing about? Max of 12???
__________________
My 2k CM Christmas tree grow!

https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=205077


When using data we can prove it, and it has been proven for many decades; it's just in the cannabis world people don't like to read anything other than lame and BS filled books from so-called cannabis gurus.

but the fact is plants (C3) grow the most at night and very early morning (i.e. the greater cellular growth and repair). Thus, if we provide the same DLI (Daily Light Integral), i.e., the sum amount of photons within PAR range in a meter^2:in 18 hours as we do in 24 hours, the plants under 18 hours of light will grow faster than those under 24 hours of light.


That is the point most people are misunderstanding, it's not about hours per day, it's about photons per day.
macdiesel is offline Quote


Old 07-26-2017, 08:42 PM #2
aridbud
automeister


aridbud's Avatar

Join Date: May 2013
Location: the best place on earth
Posts: 5,589
aridbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant futurearidbud has a brilliant future
Try this:
https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdp...try-caregivers
__________________
Seeds have the power to preserve species, to enhance cultural as well as genetic diversity, to counter economic monopoly and to check the advance of conformity on all its many fronts.
Michael Pollan
Happiness held is the seed; Happiness shared is the flower.
John Harrigan
Instant gratification takes too long.
Carrie Fisher - RIP.
afterthought autos
We are passionate breeders of unique quality cannabis autoflower hybrid seeds at down to earth prices; now 11 years running!

https://www.icmag.com/ic/forumdisplay.php?f=65770
aridbud is offline Quote


2 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-14-2017, 02:34 AM #3
b_bout_it_303
Member

Join Date: May 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 77
b_bout_it_303 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by macdiesel View Post
Can anyone link me to an official law of the new Colorado caregiver limits I've been hearing about? Max of 12???
think it is 16 unless you are scheduled for ag.
b_bout_it_303 is offline Quote


Old 11-14-2017, 03:09 PM #4
monsoon
Member

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 397
monsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the rough
I keep seeing folks mention "AG". Such a designation makes no difference when it comes to weed/plant counts. It's a Statewide rule no matter what PUD designation you are living under.

Jan. 1 2018....it's all gonna change radically on the med side.

https://coloradopolitics.com/colorad...al-properties/

There are new penalties coming for overrages as well.
monsoon is offline Quote


Old 11-14-2017, 04:57 PM #5
hellfire
Member

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 186
hellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the rough
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by monsoon View Post
I keep seeing folks mention "AG". Such a designation makes no difference when it comes to weed/plant counts. It's a Statewide rule no matter what PUD designation you are living under.
Wrong.

HB 1220
Quote:
The bill places a cap on the number of plants that can be possessed or grown on a residential property at 16 plants unless a local jurisdiction permits possessing or growing more than 16 plants.
Quote:
(II) (A) REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE PLANTS ARE FOR MEDICAL
OR RECREATIONAL USE, IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR A PERSON TO KNOWINGLY
CULTIVATE, GROW, OR PRODUCE MORE THAN TWELVE MARIJUANA PLANTS
ON OR IN A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY; OR TO KNOWINGLY ALLOW MORE THAN
TWELVE MARIJUANA PLANTS TO BE CULTIVATED, GROWN, OR PRODUCED ON
OR IN A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
The house committee brought up the fact that ag properties would not be affected during the hearing. During the hearing there was a woman from Eastern CO that explained she had ag property then the bill committee told her she would not be affected by it.

I suggest everyone reads through the bill. HB1220 has no mention of agriculture zoning in it.
hellfire is offline Quote


Old 11-14-2017, 05:05 PM #6
MJPassion
Observer

MJPassion's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: uni-verse
Posts: 5,584
MJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant future
Quote:
“Any patient or caregiver who is registered with the local government can grow up to 24 plants at home,” said Rep. Becker. “That covers 92 percent of all patients and caregivers, and then those who need more than 24 plants can petition their local government for a variance or they can grow it in a non-residential setting.”
Looks like grows of more than 24 plants are ok at multiple residences or on non residential zoned properties.

I'd still like to see this challenged (as a constitutional violation [especially in the case of medical]) but it's likely that it will not happen OR if it does, the challenge will be thrown out of court.
MJPassion is offline Quote


Old 11-14-2017, 05:08 PM #7
hellfire
Member

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 186
hellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the roughhellfire is a jewel in the rough
https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb17-1220

Whoops, forgot that

Says 16 on the page but the actual bill reads 12.
hellfire is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-14-2017, 05:16 PM #8
MJPassion
Observer

MJPassion's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: uni-verse
Posts: 5,584
MJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant futureMJPassion has a brilliant future
Plant counts are pretty disingenuous, imo, for the purpose of controlling a given operators production rates.

A limit to grow (cannopy) area would serve the purpose far more effectively.

I mean... A person could do 100 plants @ 1/sq/ft in a 10 x 10 area or they could do 4 huge 5x5 plants.
No counting necessary... Just a tape measure.

Smart producers that grow for the BM will just learn to grow 5+lb plants!
MJPassion is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-25-2017, 04:00 PM #9
monsoon
Member

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 397
monsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the roughmonsoon is a jewel in the rough
I stand corrected. However, check those tax bills....because I live in an Agriculturally designated PUD on every map there is available....yet...according to my county...because I pay RESIDENTIAL taxes, not AG taxes, I do not fall under "Ag" allowances.

Either way...we are losing rights every year...and that's why we ignore all of it here.
monsoon is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-10-2017, 03:05 AM #10
macdiesel
Member

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 296
macdiesel has a spectacular aura aboutmacdiesel has a spectacular aura aboutmacdiesel has a spectacular aura aboutmacdiesel has a spectacular aura about
So if you tell your local government, you can grow up to 24 residentially....so if you're not growing residentially, what's the limit then? Too much haze
__________________
My 2k CM Christmas tree grow!

https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=205077


When using data we can prove it, and it has been proven for many decades; it's just in the cannabis world people don't like to read anything other than lame and BS filled books from so-called cannabis gurus.

but the fact is plants (C3) grow the most at night and very early morning (i.e. the greater cellular growth and repair). Thus, if we provide the same DLI (Daily Light Integral), i.e., the sum amount of photons within PAR range in a meter^2:in 18 hours as we do in 24 hours, the plants under 18 hours of light will grow faster than those under 24 hours of light.


That is the point most people are misunderstanding, it's not about hours per day, it's about photons per day.
macdiesel is offline Quote


Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Click to visit Herbies Seeds


This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.