|
in:
|
|
| Forums > Talk About It! > Cannabis Laws & Cannabis Legislation > ??? California Cultivation Law Confusion ??? | ||
| ??? California Cultivation Law Confusion ??? | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: So Cal Desert
Posts: 22
![]() |
??? California Cultivation Law Confusion ???
Hello All,
I have a question regarding MMJ in California regarding plant count. The Law: California, local, and federal laws on medical marijuana California Medical use of marijuana/cannibis has been legal since Proposition 215, the “Compassionate Use Act,” passed in 1996 (Cal. Health & Safety (H&S) § 11362.5). In 2003, Senate Bill 420 (Cal. H&S § 11362.7 et. seq.) created a system of optional medical marijuana ID cards (Cal. H&S 11362.71), and established certain quantities of plants and dried marijuana as presumptively legal (these “safe harbor” amounts are 6 mature or 12 immature plants and 8 ounces of dried cannabis). Finally, it established guidelines for collective and cooperative cultivation (dispensaries) (Cal. H&S § 11362.768), and confirmed the rights of local governments to regulate such businesses. OK, ... 1). Is it against the law to have mature and immature plants in on the same property? 2). If not, ... how does the ratio split, ... Does every immature plant as half a plant? 3). If you can keep mature and immature plant together would (4) mature and (4) immature plants be considered illegal? Inquiring minds want to know, ... ![]() Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hi ho here we go
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kalifornica
Posts: 2,609
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would say enforcement in those areas would be nasty.
I would keep it to 12 plants, so 4 and 4 would be just fine. Good Luck |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: So Cal Desert
Posts: 22
![]() |
San Berdo county
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: So Cal Desert
Posts: 22
![]() |
Oh I do want to stay 100 % legal that's why I'm asking, ... but what is legal? Seems intentional confusion was set up in this area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,377
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One option is to 'ask the old-timers'.
I had a local old-timer, who manages a legal grow and also works at the hardware store, tell me he thought that the plant limits were - in practice, his opinion - higher than the legal limit. I think it depends a lot on the local country-side (forest vs. desert, plants are harder to see in a forest) and the local cops, e.g. Mendo vs. Kern county. I think this year (2017) we will have Big Bumper Crops of Cannabis EVERYWHERE. e.g. legal states increasing their production from 5x local consumption (i.e. only 20% of the crop is consumed in the state) to 15x to 25x local consumption. HOWEVER - look at what's happening to export markets. Who is Cali going to export to - Oregon ? Who is Oregon going to export to - Washington state ? I think everyone having lots of plants because they want to make money ... well, it might produce sort of a 'curve ball' this year. From talking to local hardware & grow store managers ... Momma Mia they're selling a lot of supplies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: So Cal Desert
Posts: 22
![]() |
Myself, I'm growing for medical reasons and am growing indoors in 2 tents, one veg and one flower. I just want to stay in legal limits if only I knew what they were.
It's the "OR" in the law that opens the door up to confusion. To me you cannot have an "OR" for the simplest of reasons, ... what if your crop somehow failed, you would have no backup plants, nothing waiting in the wings so you have to start from DAY 1. For someone who medically needs it, ... that unacceptable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,631
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's all rather nebulous. Each situation is different and you really wouldn't get an exact answer about being "legal". You could ask the sheriffs to take a look at your grow and say whether they'll arrest you or not. But they'd probably get pissed and tell you that you're wasting their time. And if they did arrest you the judge would get pissed at them for wasting his time. What you have going is too small to be of interest to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,377
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
(something to talk with an attorney if you have one) Having a letter or letters that documents your attempt to comply with state laws - that's a good thing to have. YOU TRIED. (Referring to correspondence with local LEO asking for and maybe getting some guidance.) In the law, intent is still important. If you tried to keep it copacetic, and have paper-work to that effect - that's good. |
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#9 |
|
Hi ho here we go
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kalifornica
Posts: 2,609
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#10 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: So Cal Desert
Posts: 22
![]() |
Quote:
LEO, ... Not going to happen I tried that when I bought a boat 8 years ago. I had the city come out and give me an OK to place a boat in front of my house (no back yard), ... they said yes, ... less than a year later, ... tickets, letters and harassment to the point I had to get rid of it at a great $$$ loss. And that wasn't anything as controversial as this. I'd hate to place false hopes in my local government with this considering the FEDS are still corrupt on the subject and they cannot keep their word on an issue as simple as a boat. |
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
|
|