[Gr33nSanta]

I might actually put her back in the flower room. I couldnt get a nice closeup. Not a big plant but I was in a hurry to run it so she did not get enough veg time.

[Gr33nSanta]

CD1

CBD CBC d8-THC THC CBG CBN THC-V
7.81 nd 0.02 6.8 0.37 0.49

very disappointing to say the least, same thing happened with the CBD Therapy... except I only had one female of the CBD Therapy, and I have 2 more to test for the Candida, as well as 14 more seeds.

[socioecologist]

Originally Posted by Gr33nSanta

CD1

CBD CBC d8-THC THC CBG CBN THC-V
7.81 nd 0.02 6.8 0.37 0.49

very disappointing to say the least, same thing happened with the CBD Therapy... except I only had one female of the CBD Therapy, and I have 2 more to test for the Candida, as well as 14 more seeds.

Oh man...another 1:1 breeding error? If you can't make a type III line, you can't really call yourself a plant breeder. Sorry to hear of this.

[J TricH]

Originally Posted by Gr33nSanta

CD1

CBD CBC d8-THC THC CBG CBN THC-V
7.81 nd 0.02 6.8 0.37 0.49

very disappointing to say the least, same thing happened with the CBD Therapy... except I only had one female of the CBD Therapy, and I have 2 more to test for the Candida, as well as 14 more seeds.

Originally Posted by J TricH

Yeahh.. I can already publish the result that I have, unfortunately it was not possible to get the other sample I was looking for, so, well, with this single sample we can already see the good ratio CBD/THC..

View Image


View Image

Originally Posted by socioecologist

Oh man...another 1:1 breeding error? If you can't make a type III line, you can't really call yourself a plant breeder. Sorry to hear of this.

Hey guys, that's not true, this strains is a 20:1.. you have seen my LAB test from Canna (see my quote)? Very close to 20:1 .. How did you do those tests? do you have a chance to get a HPLC test? Thanks!!

[Gr33nSanta]

Originally Posted by J TricH

Hey guys, that's not true, this strains is a 20:1.. you have seen my LAB test from Canna (see my quote)? Very close to 20:1 .. How did you do those tests? do you have a chance to get a HPLC test? Thanks!!

well, when I received the seeds they were in very nice sealed packages, pretty sure there was no error on that end.

you see, when cbdcrew announced a new cultivar with guaranteed less than 1 % THC, I bought the seeds immediately, only to find out months later, that they had adjusted their claims on their website to :

''Now after getting a lot of great feedback from growers and medicinal users, CBD Crew noticed that not all seeds came out with very low THC, high CBD. Some closer to 5:1 even a few 2:1, so CBD Crew did an extensive new round of testing of the latest seed crop to see if the variations occurred often. ''

My CBD Therapy is very similar to my CD1, my CBD Therapy has slightly less THC but still is close to 1:1. So even after CBD crew adjusted their claims on their website, the information was still misleading.

Given the amount of plants they would have tested, it's nearly impossible that they did not know before releasing the seeds.

I understand both companies are working for a good cause but both are misleading customers. Most people do not have access to a lab.

I do not wish to be the bearer of bad news, I had high hopes, but understand where I am coming from.

We will see how the other 2 turn out, but they won't be ready for a while.

Even before getting the results from the lab, I thought it got me too high to have no THC.

[socioecologist]

I think J is asking to see the official test results. I'm very curious as well. Please post them if you can, that would resolve this debate quickly.

Note my questioning earlier in the thread. ACDC x Harlequin , if using the real clones, would produce 50% type II (i.e. 1:1 or similar) and 50% type III (90%+ CBD in cannabinoid fraction).

[J TricH]

Originally Posted by Gr33nSanta

well, when I received the seeds they were in very nice sealed packages, pretty sure there was no error on that end.

you see, when cbdcrew announced a new cultivar with guaranteed less than 1 % THC, I bought the seeds immediately, only to find out months later, that they had adjusted their claims on their website to :

''Now after getting a lot of great feedback from growers and medicinal users, CBD Crew noticed that not all seeds came out with very low THC, high CBD. Some closer to 5:1 even a few 2:1, so CBD Crew did an extensive new round of testing of the latest seed crop to see if the variations occurred often. ''

My CBD Therapy is very similar to my CD1, my CBD Therapy has slightly less THC but still is close to 1:1. So even after CBD crew adjusted their claims on their website, the information was still misleading.

Given the amount of plants they would have tested, it's nearly impossible that they did not know before releasing the seeds.

I understand both companies are working for a good cause but both are misleading customers. Most people do not have access to a lab.

I do not wish to be the bearer of bad news, I had high hopes, but understand where I am coming from.

We will see how the other 2 turn out, but they won't be ready for a while.

Even before getting the results from the lab, I thought it got me too high to have no THC.

Originally Posted by socioecologist

I think J is asking to see the official test results. I'm very curious as well. Please post them if you can, that would resolve this debate quickly.

Note my questioning earlier in the thread. ACDC x Harlequin , if using the real clones, would produce 50% type II (i.e. 1:1 or similar) and 50% type III (90%+ CBD in cannabinoid fraction).

Yes thanks, it would be nice to know the source of the test, this is not to say that I distrust the words, but there are many "types" of cheap test running on the market. We all know that HPLC is too expensive for the average user.. On the other hand, for your question sociecologist I do not know the answer, Txuck should read this soon, I hope he can answer that ..

[Gr33nSanta]

The lab that tested for it is a friend of a friend of a friend. I believe the machine used was an HPLC, a machine was involved is all I know... My own bioassay told me it was high THC.

Maybe I got a one in a thousand type of plant, I will report back when I get the other 2 tested.

If my own bioassay did not match the lab results, I would look into getting it tested at a different lab but right now I have to save money for further testing ....

[J TricH]

Originally Posted by Gr33nSanta

The lab that tested for it is a friend of a friend of a friend. I believe the machine used was an HPLC, a machine was involved is all I know... My own bioassay told me it was high THC.

Maybe I got a one in a thousand type of plant, I will report back when I get the other 2 tested.

If my own bioassay did not match the lab results, I would look into getting it tested at a different lab but right now I have to save money for further testing ....

Ok, thanks, now it would be interesting if the sample has passed through the hands of all those friends of friends too.. Well now seriously, we can talk privately to see if we can do a test of your samples in optimal conditions?

[Gr33nSanta]

Originally Posted by J TricH

Ok, thanks, now it would be interesting if the sample has passed through the hands of all those friends of friends too.. Well now seriously, we can talk privately to see if we can do a test of your samples in optimal conditions?

I trust the results I have are accurate enough. When I got Les Fleurs Bleues tested, I had a reputable lab doing the testing, it came out as 13.6% CBD and 9.5% THC, my friend's friend's friend's also tested that sample (before the other lab did) and came out at 9.5 CBD and 7 THC. Lower numbers, same ratios. Based on this I feel I can trust the results I got yesterday. Feel free to PM me.