[miltiano32]

Originally Posted by habeeb

not sure I like spectrum for flower.. little more red needed in my opinion.

I agree with this, the spectrum in flower that i prefer is not there. I'll be passing on this company. Their are others out there, very competitive space with this technology thats manifesting in the LED lighting area.

[humble1]

C'mon Morgan, repost the stuff from RIU!

[PetFlora]

Originally Posted by habeeb

not sure I like spectrum for flower.. little more red needed in my opinion.. also no verification on actual unit as they can't get a sphere test because price, so we will never know true value most likely..

I think a step in the right direction.. if that was my panel I would add some 660, but I don't know much... been out of the loop forever

sure as hell would be a killer veg panel.. excited to see what it does. I'm sure none the les sit's efficient as hell, as is nice to see the plants under


maybe I'm picky but I like my lights with wifi and shit inside now.. come on we are in the tech age

It amazes me how people still believe 660 is important. Reminds me of blurple acolytes

630 is far more efficient and does 95% of what 660 does.

[PetFlora]

Originally Posted by miltiano32

I agree with this, the spectrum in flower that i prefer is not there. I'll be passing on this company. Their are others out there, very competitive space with this technology thats manifesting in the LED lighting area.

They're working on increasing spectrum choices. In the mean time, a small grower can start with what's available, then later get a more flower friendly panel. That said, as usual, CptM has crushed it with their current panels

[Koondense]

These quantum panels seem to be great, just seen a bit of growmau5 live video and his naw light looks amazing.
Too bad it's all happening on US soil, so we, the other world, can just look and clean our saliva

I'm glad the led lights keep evolving, yet the cxbs and other cobs still rock.

[morgandecaptain]

I will be using this spectrum as soon as they are released and can be assembled.

[morgandecaptain]

Day 56 chop.

[Smoking Lamp]

remember emerson used 630 660 and 715nm in unison and was surprised to find a final overall weight, consistently.......
that said emmersons effect really has never been documented in cannabis and barring that even similar phenotypes have differet lighht requirements....let alone an opinion genus wide......and it sure hasnt ever been correlated to C3 / C4 status....which would make some important headway imho.

@petflora

[FunkBomb]

From those pictures it looks like those quantum boards are legit. Nice work

-Funk

[PetFlora]

Originally Posted by Smoking Lamp

remember emerson used 630 660 and 715nm in unison and was surprised to find a final overall weight, consistently.......
that said emmersons effect really has never been documented in cannabis and barring that even similar phenotypes have differet lighht requirements....let alone an opinion genus wide......and it sure hasnt ever been correlated to C3 / C4 status....which would make some important headway imho.

@petflora

Most DIYers are big on 660 using it exclusively for deep reds. As I pointed to, 660 is very inefficient (short life) and that 630 provides 95% of 660s benefit with a longer life and better efficiency

Now if one is adding them separately so that they can be replaced without tearing the rest of the panel apart, ok, but...