Register ICMag Forum Menu Features
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > IC Magazine > Marijuana News > Police and Prison Guard Groups Fight Marijuana Legalization in California

Thread Title Search
Click for Weed Seed Shop
Post Reply
Police and Prison Guard Groups Fight Marijuana Legalization in California Thread Tools
Old 05-19-2016, 09:14 PM #21
BOMBAYCAT
Senior Member

BOMBAYCAT's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,004
BOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of lightBOMBAYCAT is a glorious beacon of light
What a surprise. They are worried about losing revenue with the new law. What worries me is they will take away Medical and make everyone buy Recreational (with the high taxes). I am from Colorado and Medical is written into the state constitution, but I am really worried they will raise the taxes a lot.
BOMBAYCAT is offline Quote


Old 05-20-2016, 01:04 AM #22
iBogart
Member

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 458
iBogart is just really niceiBogart is just really niceiBogart is just really niceiBogart is just really niceiBogart is just really niceiBogart is just really niceiBogart is just really niceiBogart is just really niceiBogart is just really niceiBogart is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoned-trout View Post
I will be voting no too....yeehaw...law enforcement wont loose any money as the taxes brought in will far exceed any money gotten previously from any source by a far margin...but I will take the help anywhere I can get it...JUST SAY NO...if they come up with a reasonable law that don't restrict my home growing then I will say yes...I can already have an lb and 24 plants plus grower exemption and caregiver for a few folks...I wont be taking a step backwards if I can help it...current medicinal is better than the bullshit legalization being proposed....
How do I know you're not dumping fertilizer down the storm drain? How do I know you're not using systemic insecticide and fungicide on your crop? How do I know the cannabinoid profile and concentration of your crop?

From what I gather, you can still be a caregiver under this law.
iBogart is offline Quote


Old 05-20-2016, 01:42 AM #23
gekolite
Member

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 259
gekolite is a jewel in the roughgekolite is a jewel in the roughgekolite is a jewel in the roughgekolite is a jewel in the roughgekolite is a jewel in the roughgekolite is a jewel in the roughgekolite is a jewel in the rough
IF it stops one person from getting arrested for cannabis I will vote yes ,as a competitive fellow I like to win against the police , and guards .
gekolite is offline Quote


2 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-20-2016, 07:54 PM #24
trippn
Member

Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 168
trippn has a spectacular aura abouttrippn has a spectacular aura abouttrippn has a spectacular aura abouttrippn has a spectacular aura abouttrippn has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by gekolite View Post
IF it stops one person from getting arrested for cannabis I will vote yes ,as a competitive fellow I like to win against the police , and guards .
It definitely does not stop the people already incarcerated for Cannabis from being incarcerated

For that fact alone; i would absolutely never vote for this dystopian bill. Fuck Sean Parker; period.
trippn is offline Quote


Old 05-20-2016, 08:09 PM #25
whadeezlrg
Just Say Grow

whadeezlrg's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: west koast blowin smoke with the old folks cuz they know most
Posts: 3,798
whadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond repute
AUMA is terrible...I know that prop 19 wasn't this bad.
__________________
CA Med Patient in STRICT COMPLIANCE with CA Prop. 215

my shipping container grow https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=308346
whadeezlrg is offline Quote


Old 05-20-2016, 11:05 PM #26
chomedome
Newbie

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 32
chomedome will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by trippn View Post
It definitely does not stop the people already incarcerated for Cannabis from being incarcerated

For that fact alone; i would absolutely never vote for this dystopian bill. Fuck Sean Parker; period.
Actually it does:

RELIEF FOR PRIOR OFFENDERS: Persons previously convicted of offenses that would not be a crime or would be a lesser offense under AUMA may apply to the court for a recall or dismissal of their sentence. (11361.8)

11361.8

(a) A person currently serving a sentence for a conviction, whether by trial or by open or negotiated plea, who would not have been guilty of an offense or who would have been guilty of a lesser offense under the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act had that Act been in effect at the time of the offense may petition for a recall or dismissal of sentence before the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction in his or her case to request resentencing or dismissal in accordance with Sections 11357, 11358, 11359, 11360, 11362.1, 11362.2, 11362. 3, and 11362. 4 as those sections have been amended or added by this Act.
chomedome is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-20-2016, 11:24 PM #27
whadeezlrg
Just Say Grow

whadeezlrg's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: west koast blowin smoke with the old folks cuz they know most
Posts: 3,798
whadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond reputewhadeezlrg has a reputation beyond repute
you wouldnt currently be in jail for anything that is legal under auma unless you were growing less than 6 plants without a rec right?
__________________
CA Med Patient in STRICT COMPLIANCE with CA Prop. 215

my shipping container grow https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=308346
whadeezlrg is offline Quote


Old 05-21-2016, 04:40 AM #28
lemonskunk
Member

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 67
lemonskunk will become famous soon enough
If you vote yes you could help all the prisoners/people with criminal records.. The people that said they would vote no sound like jerks. Never heard of baby steps? Once its legal and the haters see its no big deal then you can get picky. What part about voting to change a law makes you think that a new law can never be ammended?
lemonskunk is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-21-2016, 06:54 AM #29
minds_I
The Emperor is not only naked but batshit crazy.

minds_I's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Norcal USA
Posts: 5,269
minds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud ofminds_I has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by chomedome View Post
Wow! Stoners against legalization and the police have something in common. Voting no on AUMA because they are afraid of losing revenue.

Hello all,

Would be clearer as..." Both voting on AUMA...."

Might have to find alternative incomes.

minds_I
__________________

His contempt for objective truth is the rejection of democratic accountability, an implicit demand that his supporters place undying faith in him. Because the only measure of truth he accepts is what he claims at any given moment, the power his supporters vest in him is unlimited. Sound familiar?
If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.
In the United States, under our Constitution, a free press is a check on politicians of all parties. If we are to demand that other countries respect the tradition of a free press we must also practice that here at home.
Let the people know the facts, and the country will be safe.
minds_I is offline Quote


Old 05-21-2016, 08:45 AM #30
yesum
IC Mag Supporter

yesum's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,397
yesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud ofyesum has much to be proud of
They should have said they are afraid their children will have less toys when their income drops. More honest.

I had no trouble getting pot in high school back in the 70's, I am sure it is no problem today. Holland has less pot use for minors than US and has had pot shops for decades.

On the plant limits (should be canopy size), I do not like that but this is a start anyways. The cities are banning medical cultivation all over so that medical exemption is effectively over for many right now.
yesum is offline Quote


Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Click to Visit Mars Hydro for Growroom Lights and Tents


This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.