|
in:
|
|
| Forums > ICMag Vendor Forums > Seed Boutique > Tom Hill X-18 | ||
| Tom Hill X-18 | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#101 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,349
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,252
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think Tom said the entire N. Indian project seeds were eaten by rats and he would have to start over, then he made mention of raids and that was right before he left here for good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 427
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
damn where is the man, is he safe ? he was one of the best of the forum to me, i hope he is on the hill or somewhere mind surfing on isle 9, long time no see and i dont like that
__________________
I, for one, prefer plants to camps - less cults of personality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,041
![]() |
Some X18 soon on Phylos Galaxy
I sent in three X18 samples for the DNA project and Sam just pm'd me they had arrived. Might take a while till the results will be uploaded on Phylos Galaxy, but soon enough we will have better idea what's in X18.
I sent in two samples from Tom Hill's line and one sample coming from Reserva Privada's X18.
__________________
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB **** |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 386
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I have been trying to get my X18 seeds to germ. I got what were probably the last 4 packs out there. I threw them in the fridge for a month first thing, then tried to germ 10. The first 10 didn't germ. I used 200 ppm GA3 and a bit of hydrogen peroxide on the second 10 three days ago and have seen 1 tail emerge so far. It may or may not poop out on me. All I need is either a male and a female or two females... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
prescription blunts
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,561
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
got a pack as a freebie froma recent bay order
![]() tagged for future reference. ![]() has anyone ever used x18 as an outcross for an og line?
__________________
. c a n n a b i s . s a v e d . m y . l i f e . <3.F.U.C.K.E.M.F.A.M.<3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,041
![]() |
No it's pure X18 only made with one female and one male, while Tom Hill's X18 was made with open-polination using many females and males
__________________
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB **** |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: 39° N
Posts: 311
![]() ![]() |
I emailed DNA because on the website it says 99% indica their reply was it's because it has 1% sativa
Always thought Tom Hills was 100% selected landrace paki indica? X18 Pure Pakistani Pure Pakistani Landrace 99% Indica : 1% Sativa Flowering Time: 8-9 Weeks Yield: 450-600g/m2 Comical I really don't get it myself.....I'm not saying they don't have some decent product's just confusing
__________________
"if" the biggest small word in the dictionary Last edited by acespicoli; 01-10-2017 at 07:17 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,041
![]() |
Quote:
X18 is not a 100% indica, not Tom Hill's nor DNA's X18. If you look at the tent photos of the Tom Hill X18 open-poli seed run, you can see some plants that are very much sativa. You can find these X18 tent photos in my "Misc" album. The only male Tom Hill x18 that i had and flowered was very, very stretchy with very sativa-looking colas. And i can spot the same type in those TH open-poli photos. ![]() EDIT: It's also wrong to call X18 a "landrace" because the seeds were found in Pakistani import hash, nobody collected them from wild/feral paki plants. It's a hash-cultivar, most likely created By a farmer. Like i have mentioned before, imo, it has N. Indian sativa in it, i believe it's Manali.
__________________
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB **** Last edited by GoatCheese; 01-10-2017 at 12:58 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
~~ ॐ नमः शिवाय ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,041
![]() |
The problem here is with definition. Indica and Sativa are outmoded definitions in the cannabis world. This is why some are using the terms wide leaf drug (WLD) and narrow leaf drug (NLD) to describe appearance. If you travel throughout Nepal and the foothills of the Himalayas you'll find all types of expressions - these range from tall lanky thin leaved plants, squat wide leafed plants, tall lanky wide leafed plants and squat thin leafed plants. Point being is that the diversity of genetics and traits in this area outweighs our terrible categorising system.
If you travel the Himalayas you'll find that farmers cannabis plots can look very much different even in the next valley to each other. If the plots are selectively bred then you're going to get more plants that are going to look similar. Tom's x18 for sure is predominantly WLD. The seed that started the gene pool may or may not of been selected for generations in Pakistan before they got to the US. Also, I think Tom said that the 'Scientist' also removed traits that would negatively impact on the gene pool. Other than this it's an OP.. All my x18 were squat wide leaved Afghanica type structure until I grew cuts indoors. The nodes then gathered space between them. It isn't 'Sativa' by any stretch of the imagination in my eyes. Maybe you could call some genotypes 'stretch Indica's but it has no tropical, equatorial traits in flower structure. Just my 2 cents
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|