|
in:
|
|
| Forums > Marijuana Growing > Marijuana Strains and Breeding > Original Glue > STARDAWG VS. Original Glue #4 | ||
| STARDAWG VS. Original Glue #4 | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: the High Place of Anu
Posts: 116
![]() ![]() |
STARDAWG VS. Original Glue #4
Preparing for this outdoor season here in Nor Cal...
Which is more suitable for a full sun outdoor crop? I hear that GG4 and SD grow similar to eachother, wide and bushy, and have heavy yields... how about the flowering period? I also keep hearing that if GG4 were grown in full sun, the flowers would brown and appear golden when dried and cured... thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
AppAlachiAn OutLaW
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: The Trap-house 37.5n
Posts: 2,205
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
hey foreginerabroad..i have no info regarding these strains but i wanted to ask u if any of u norcal guys use actinovate there for prevention of bud rot? i picked up it due to another guy on a fourm from norcal that said alot of growers use it there..thanks man
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: the High Place of Anu
Posts: 116
![]() ![]() |
Yes, people use Actinovate here. I've used it before, it works pretty well.
Green Cure is also effective, but it's basically baking soda... just raising the PH Anyway, back to the main question |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 369
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Having grown neither, but of the packs I've seen from this last outdoor I would say stardawg...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Nor-Cal: Humboldt, Yosemite, Central Valley
Posts: 122
![]() |
i grow both and i would say stardawg is better outdoors. its less finicky and yields better than gg4. i got both of these strains from dark heart nursery and my gg4 is not a high yielder.
|
|
|
2 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: the High Place of Anu
Posts: 116
![]() ![]() |
^by the sound of it, you may or may not have the "true" GG#4...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Nor-Cal: Humboldt, Yosemite, Central Valley
Posts: 122
![]() |
Its the only pheno i have done so I'm not quite sure what the "true" one is. Dark heart has a very good reputation out these ways, check out their site. I did well with it, just yielded a little better with the star dawg. GG4 was better quality but definitely not as strong as the star dawg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: the High Place of Anu
Posts: 116
![]() ![]() |
what I mean by that is, GG#4 is known to be a heavy yielder... and you have said that your cut did not yield heavily. I've heard that she can be touchy about nutes but for the most part, she is a proven heavy yielder.
the breeder himself spoke with Dark Heart to be verify the source of their "GG#4" cut and supposedly it is the actual #4 cut, I still would not trust a well known commercial clone supplier with highly coveted elite genetics... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Nor-Cal: Humboldt, Yosemite, Central Valley
Posts: 122
![]() |
any thing i have gotten from dark heart have been great plants. pest free and really high quality stuff, always what they say it is. gg4 is suppose to be a hermie plant that someone saved the seeds of and planted years later and got the 4 different phones and decided to keep #4. doesnt sound too elite to me, but it is a really high quality strain. what other source supposedly has the true gg4? i would love to run it and see the difference.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,118
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
would be fun to re-make that indirect pollination and select for bigger offspring generation.
what was the female plant and which strain gave the herm pollen when gg bornt? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|