[wolfhoundaddy]

I think you confuse existing medical law with mpp's draft for initiative concerning recreational marijuana.

[MrBelvedere]

Originally Posted by wolfhoundaddy

I think you confuse existing medical law with mpp's draft for initiative concerning recreational marijuana.

Yes maybe I'm not sure. The final unified draft was submitted by MPP and apparently thanks to all the pressure on the two dispensaries there will be home grow rights for everyone. No 25 mile rule it seems? It looks like municipalities can only make rules to regulate dispensaries, not home grown. Not sure 100%.

https://www.regulatemarijuanainarizo...ative-summary/

Now time to get out the vote

.

[wolfhoundaddy]

Gonna have to wake and bake

Happy 420 everybody

Can'T wait to grow Leagally! Let's get er done

[paper thorn]

well, i have to retract my above post, i definitely have the amma and this legalization stuff confused.
Saw the 6 plants per person, i'll have to read the whole bill, didn't see the 12 per household.

6 sucks, but better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick.

[wolfhoundaddy]

36-2860. possession. personal use and production,marijuana products,.....
gets you 5 grams concentrate, 6 plants per person, 12 per household and all the marijuana produced on the site.

Here is the final text to MPP's proposed amendments for legalization
https://www.regulatemarijuanainarizo...itiative-text/
I don't see in this the Medical provisions I see a lot of TARE "Tax Allocate Regulate Enforce" I don't see this as legalization. I don't think much of it will stand to constitutional muster. I like the very last part so just WHAT are you voting for then?

" Sec. 8. Severability If a provision of this Act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the Act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Act are severable. - See more at: https://www.regulatemarijuanainarizo....6YPoV4B5.dpuf

I really don't see the reason or benefit to the citizen here with this push. Holding the distribution point to 1in12 of Class A liquor licenses appointments to boards by the Governor, Immune from rule making, the "Board" will investigate and monitor the "Board" So the biggest contributor to the Governors Election Campaign will be those on the "Board"
IMHO this is just bad very bad proposed legislation. Everyone seems to think that Big Gift under the tree is growrights but like the last paragraph says if any parts is found not to comply then it wont stand. Well get this Grows right wont comply with previous administrative law on the 25 mile rule so it could be those growrights are thrown. I mean who is going to sit on the board? This is lambs to the slaughter bah bah bah I can grow my own bah bah.

[wolfhoundaddy]

It would be nice if someone could give us the cliff notes for this. It is hard to understand leagalsleaze.

I have heard that most of the conflict between the 'players' was not the issue of home grow, but the decision to who would get the really big bone. Follow the money.

Just like with our national politics they keep us mollified on one front and rat pack us somewhere else. So I'll take my little "we'll let you grow", and slither off to my corner.
Sad but it is an old game.

Originally Posted by wolfhoundaddy

It would be nice if someone could give us the cliff notes for this. It is hard to understand leagalsleaze.

I have heard that most of the conflict between the 'players' was not the issue of home grow, but the decision to who would get the really big bone. Follow the money.

Just like with our national politics they keep us mollified on one front and rat pack us somewhere else. So I'll take my little "we'll let you grow", and slither off to my corner.
Sad but it is an old game.

I understand I agree with you. I have been prosecuted so many times. I am getting to know the brands of whips that have ripped and torn the tender skin of society so many time. for What has been called the public good "current Marijuana laws" If you just read the Summary and then read the TEXT you will see the fine print in legalize and who editorialized it?

I will only support 100% grow rights , 100% free market rights, 100% medical if a complete test on each and every product certified and bonded in course. All Medical will be administered by the AZDHS and sued to comply and pick up the legal tabs to force compliance. Max that can be taxed in any part of the state is 17% this includes all local and state agencies. there will be no wholesale tax flat tax on sales that is it. Hemp goes to the dept of Agriculture as it will become a commodity soon and governed by international trade and federal mandates.

We the citizens of Arizona pass this crap the stink storm that follow in contrast to federal laws will be fantastic.

Wolf, They are not prosecuting individuals now who at home who have a medical card that are growing less than 12 Flowering Viable plants now. You see selling large over the limit operations being busted but not the card holder. That's what they want to change the law right now. An Administrative Law Judge says the 25 mile rule is compliant with the law. The AZ supreme and Appeals court say the 25 mile rule is in conflict with the MMJ written law and stands. It is unlawful to prosecute for an individual to be prosecuted for growing 12 plants with a medical card. There is just absolutely no one that has anything to gain by reporting this. Except the home grower and this and the like is the only forum they have Bless you grow and your understanding

Look at what is pending the Obamas approval this will effectually removes Marijuana off the schedule 1 list.
https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...216-story.html

so If Medical marijuana is allowed by the Feds, and AZ goes with this ridiculous proposal regulate marijuana. We will no longer have Medical or the protections from the federal government or standards that will be set by the FDA. But we will have the ability to grow 6 plants that the rules could very easily say you bought from a state licensed and only a stain allowed by the state. Rules could say no more than a 8% thc level will be allowed to grow the rule are not in you don't know what your voting for. Except that there will be a board to with fantastic powers license enforce and tax that is it.