|
in:
|
|
| Forums > Talk About It! > Toker's Den > bill clintons old lady | ||
| bill clintons old lady | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
bill clintons old lady
is a bottom of page,,,,,,,,,,,By Paul Harvey
Conveniently Forgotten Facts. Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow black panther named Alex Rackley needed to die. Rackley was suspected of disloyalty. Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water on him. When they got tired of torturing Rackley, Black Panther member, Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head. Rackley's body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north of New Haven, Connecticut. Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what happened to these Black Panthers? In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of the killers was still in jail. The shooter, Warren Kimbro,managed to get a scholarship to Harvard and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He later became an assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College. Isn't that something? As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's head and a few years later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean! Only in America! Erica Huggins was the woman who served the Panthers by boiling the water for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a California School Board. How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy? Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to the defense of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused Black Panthers during their trial. One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a California School Board. He is now head of the United States Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton. O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is this other notable Panther defender now a schoolboard member? Is this other Panther apologist now an assistant college dean? No,neither! The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law student at Yale University at the time. She is now known as "The smartest woman in the world." She is none other than the Democratic senator from the State of New York----our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton And now, as Paul Harvey said; "You know the rest of the story". Pass this on! This deserves the widest possible press. Also remember it, when, she runs for President. |
|
|

|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 77
![]() |
You got neo-cons that have wrecked the economy, are wrecking the planet, couldn't manage a decent response to a hurricane, commited treason by outing intelligence agents and sent thousands to die in Iraq for a lie about WMD's.
But the one we have to worry about is Hillary. You might want to look up the word "priority" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
you might want to look up other stuff on line besides weed sites like urben legends and folklore,,,,,,,then figure fact,fiction,gossip,online free sites or just plane what is real or fact ,fiction,gossip or plane paul harvey
Last edited by jack; 05-31-2006 at 10:24 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
For two impartial reviews of the facts themselves, see "Black Panthers" by David Mikkelson of the Urban Legends Reference Pages and "Hillary Clinton and the Black Panthers" from Urban Legend Zeitgeist. As to the misrepresentation of the facts, here are the main objections: Was Hillary Clinton a "defender" of the Black Panther murderers? Not in the sense implied. Remember, these were accused murderers at the time she and other campus activists took up their cause (unless presumption of innocence somehow doesn't apply here). Secondly, there was a widespread suspicion among leftists that the Panther leaders had been framed by police and in any case were unlikely to get a fair trial in New Haven. Lastly, it's evident from the role for which Clinton volunteered during the actual trial – that of observer for the American Civil Liberties Union – that her interest lay precisely in its fairness and legality. Did Clinton help the accused murderers "get off easy?" No. How could she have? She played no direct role in the trial or sentencing. Did Clinton organize demonstrations that "shut down" Yale University? She was involved in such demonstrations, but how major a leadership role she played is under dispute. Eyewitness accounts place her at planning meetings but also characterize her as contributing a "moderate voice" to those proceedings. For the record, the demonstrations did not "shut down" the university. Similar protests went on at schools across the country. Does Clinton's participation in the demonstrations and trial 30 years ago reflect negatively on Clinton in the present? Only if you assume that student activism is bad and that having once been involved in it taints one for life. Taking into account the turmoil of the times and the widespread spirit of dissent on college campuses everywhere during the Nixon/Vietnam era, Clinton's documented activities were relatively tame and rational. One can certainly disagree with her politic beliefs, but the evidence shows Clinton was neither anti-American nor a gun-toting revolutionary, however much certain parties in the present would love you to think so. The Smear Campaign Continues David Mikkelson's thoughtful dissection of the email rumor also supplies some of the missing context required to objectively judge Clinton's allegiances and activities at the time. It also betrays the motives of those so adamantly perpetuating the smear, and thus has aroused their ire. Mikkelson's piece was derided on one conservative message board as a "a thinly-veiled whitewash." The angry reader wrote: "The learned liberals with their college libraries and research powers appear to first find an answer they like and then use their intellect and university education to obfuscate the truth that might hurt their views or their hallowed leaders." In other words, we're to assume Mikkelson must have a left-wing agenda and his critique was biased. Unsurprisingly, no one on the message board took issue with Mikkelson's exoneration of G.W. Bush in the racial covenant affair, a case in which the smear tactics originated from the left. The fact is, Mikkelson and his wife, Barbara, have established an unblemished track record of political impartiality over the years. Another nexus of conservatism on the Net, "Insight Magazine," regurgitated the anti-Clinton allegations in 2001 in an article entitled "Hillary Hides Her Panther Fling." It offers testimony verifying that both Clinton and Bill Lann Lee "indeed were student leaders during the Panther protests" and concludes from that rather bland fact that each can therefore be held accountable for the accused murderers "getting off easy." But it's not entirely a muddleheaded rehash. The article goes on to enumerate in some detail Clinton's contacts with various communists during the time period in question. You heard right. Insight reveals that Hillary Clinton associated with communists in her youth. Is it true? Yes. Among the lawyers trying the Panther case were some communists and former communists. Clinton knew them and worked with them. Was Clinton herself a communist? No. Did she advocate a communist takeover of the United States? No. Then what is the point of "naming names" of these people Clinton knew and worked with as a student activist 30 years ago? To find her guilty by association, we must conclude. Some reading this may be too young to recall, but in the 1950s this particular tactic came to be known as "McCarthyism," and has been roundly condemned in the ensuing decades. But, as I said at the outset, the age-old dirty tricks are still very much in vogue and I would be hard-pressed to scrounge up a more perfect contemporary example. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: in the blimp
Posts: 742
![]() ![]() |
told. ^
__________________
lifes a garden - - grow it |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
EL CID SQUID
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Very High....in the Rockies
Posts: 834
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hillary Clinton is the only wife of a sitting US President to attend a Bilderberg Meeting. Moreover, she seems to have some very strange bedfellow's.....
Hillary Clinton: Who's Party..?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: By the sea
Posts: 345
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Right on, Jack. As a currently disgruntled Republican, I'd love another party to give me a viable option to vote for. Unfortunately, reflexive opposition to Bush's policies does not a platform make.
Fat A P.S. Welcome back everybody! It's good to have our home open again
__________________
My 'Snow Angel' (GreenCrack) Pix (grow/harvest/macro)~~Frosty Goodness! Fruity, euphoric moms...where are you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 448
![]() ![]() |
Then you look at spin on Bush and he supposidly has Hitler ties, Saudi and Iran ties so who do you trust.? I go with the answer, nobody. The internet always has stated facts. I used to be into reading them till I realised I think its all BS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 35
![]() |
Those who voted for Bush deserve to have the Republicans win in the next election once again. I hope they win and drive the country into the ground.
But what will probably happen is the completely incompitent Decomcrats will win even thought they wont even run on any platform. Either way its fucked. Last edited by Keisersozze; 05-31-2006 at 09:33 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 77
![]() |
>> I hope they win and drive the country into the ground.
The past few years have been very good to leftists like myself. For example - American conservatives hated at home (bush at 29% approval and the repub congress at 18%) American conservatives hated throughout the whole world. American prestige and influence at an all time low. The socialist take over of just about all of South America after they kicked out the right wingers. Mexican socialist candidate leading in the poles for 18 months. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|