|
in:
|
|
| Forums > Marijuana Growing > Growroom Designs & Equipment > poison co2 generator | ||
| poison co2 generator | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31 | ||
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 18
![]() |
Quote:
As far as using an o2 meter in the room, thats an interesting idea. I do not think i have ever seen an environmental o2 meter. I do have a DO meter for water, don't imagine thats gonna help at all. Honestly, I do not suspect there is too little oxygen in there. The lamps are air cooled. The hoods are the newest generation of the magnum xxxl's (which I love) they have 4 different wing nuts that seal them down and a gasket. I am happy with the seal, but there is no doubt in my mind that some ambient air is brought into the room this way (I push air through the hoods, not pull it). I honestly think the only people that could consider a room too well sealed, to where oxygen levels dropped off, would be someone without air cooled lamps a just straight up hermitic fucking seal on everything. One of the worst things about this problem is if anyone looked at the plants they would suspect root zone issues, PH issues, and maybe some overfeeding. Quote:
Really the last step I can imagine is to get another controller and run them opposite each other. I wouldn't mind having two on hand anyway, just gotta get in there and do it. I am thinking of going with a sentinel chhc4. I like that it has some extra features. Not too much benefit for me in this room but it would be nice. Best of all I could set 500-600 and let them ripen without turning on the air exchange. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: In a Sour Bubble
Posts: 5,233
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
the road I'm going down is things are bad using a gas burner,
using the bottled co2 and no probs. pretty much looks like the gas burner is the culprit, now...why? something may be going on with the controller interacting with burner.. ![]() and if your not getting anything as far as an accurate read out of your ppms thats a weak link in the figuring out what really going on? since you good with the tank you may just keep going with that, I'm naturally curious about the why's and how's of things like this. at any rate having a good Co2 monitor is a good idea anyways. knowing your ppms could save your life, a guy here went in his room after the controller dumped the tank, he passed out heading for the great gig in the sky... luck was on his side, his wife found him and drug him out of the room. but anyways, i use a green air SPC-1 Co2 controller/monitor with read out that is very accurate. and i also have a green eye co2/temp/rh data logger with read out. kinda accurate, usually within a 100-130ppms of my green air. after calibration the green eye is good for 5-7days. it's not a quality unit imo, compared to the green air anyways
__________________
flying in a blue dream! --------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 18
![]() |
Quote:
I will get another meter before too long, but it will more than likely take me a month or so mostly based on that it will ultimately serve as an environment controller and safety backup for the air cooling. Don't think I could even get in there and hook that up now if my life depended on it. While I can't say 100% positively that the controller is accurate I very much suspect the burner. I am super envious of your setup. You basically have two great controllers. Don't know much about greenair but based on price and to some extent reputation I believe them to be some higher end units out there. I honestly believe this is a somewhat common issue. I think the horticultural industry as a whole has seen this before. I believe this may be why they phased most natural gas burners out of commercial greenhouses. I haven't been able to find the article talking about that, but did find a couple others documenting ethylene damage in the horticultural industry. https://www.greenhousegrower.com/plan...he-greenhouse/ https://www.hort.cornell.edu/mattson/leatherwood/ Besides the insta schwaag effect of long term exposure I think its interesting how it increases the speed of senescence, which is something I definitely noticed. I found that if I had a nug come off or if I took a taster branch out, they where always good, ultimately it turns out, better than once the plant reached what we would assume to be its point of maturation. I bet you we are gonna start seeing new generators. Either low nox or some kind of completely sealed infrared arraignment. I have hopes for low nox, not sure I think the infrared ceramic element would solve the problem. The low nox stuff makes sense because they designed the burners in the 80's to combust in a different way that helped eliminate NO2 (which was combining with other gasses and causing acid rain). I have not been able to find any info on low nox as it relates to ethelyne but it stands to reason it could help eliminate the problem. I think this is something that is gonna be less of a problem in a larger commercial space that is using a lung room. It seems like that in a larger space the generator is going to come on and stay on for a longer amount of time, ultimately achieving reliable combustion for the vast majority of the time its on. Also whatever byproducts of combustion that are produced are spread over a much larger volume of air. I certainly know people running sealed environments with lung rooms successfully, but they tend to be larger physical spaces. That is actually why I thought I could fix or minimize the problem by going down to 1 or 2 burners and periodically venting the room. It didn't help me with this generator but it makes sense why it would work, and from what I have gathered that has been an acceptable solution for some people. This is why I suspect this particular generator to be sub standard. Its hard to believe that it is operating as it was designed and yet still so reliably causing the issue. As time and money allows i will definitely try some other generators. Basically I think any petro based co2 gen is going to create ethylene and sulfur and whatever else is causing this, but it seems like the better designed ones have less of a problem somehow. What the other companies are engineering differently I couldn't begin to tell you but it must be something. Also it seems to be reflected in price. It would seem to me that the greenair company better be doing something different if all there gear costs 3 times more (and I suspect that they are) |
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#34 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 18
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Easy St.
Posts: 4,412
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Buy a cheap Carbon Monoxide monitor/alarm, seal the room. See what happens. Good luck. -granger
__________________
Fully compliant Medical Patient. |
|
|
2 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#36 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: In a Sour Bubble
Posts: 5,233
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I'm using a $112 tankless hot water heater on a DIY set up the money I saved allowed me to upgrade yo a better quality controler like the green air ![]() the burner was $450-500 and by the chart and room size it would be on 6-7min at a pop.... didn't like that because of heat issues. mine is on for 30 seconds....max. it has a different burner on it also, not like the mushroom thingies it has the rows with many small holes. btw, i noticed you mentioned nat gas as a fuel for the burner, curious, are you using it or propane
__________________
flying in a blue dream! --------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | ||
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 18
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
I always used propane as a fuel for generators, was tempted to run gas for NG but never have done it. The reason I mentioned that, and the reason that I will not ever do that now, is because on the whole the horticultural industry is ditching NG and going propane. I guess they had more issues with NG generators (for them its heat I believe, the co2 is just a byproduct of heating the greenhouse) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
More hash tea...
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: land of hummingbirds and turtles
Posts: 1,818
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What an interesting and neat thread.
__________________
That which matters most |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Dipshit Know-Nothing
![]() Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Van Isle, BC
Posts: 4,971
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Alllllright. So maybe found something.
For one thing, you can try raising your temps closer to the low 80s, (tying in to the whole reason we can raise CO2, when the earths atmosphere was different and temperatures were warmer). There are calculations for specific ppm of CO2 to temp ratio, I think Snype posted them here, though I may be wrong. Anyway, Got this at Tea Aitch Sea Pharmer of all places. Linked Thread *Oh yeah right, we can't link to other cannabis websites. That would upset the balance of the universe. Power trippin' down the hiiiiighwaaaay.......* Easy enough to change the url. Stupid to have to, but easy enough... Specifically, this post A few posts below, a novel way to test for ethylene. Quote:
Summarized, the CO2 burner depletes O2 levels, causing incomplete combustion of the propane, leading to ethylene and SO2 build up. In the video you posted, the generator burns clean. What you would want to look for is the appearance after a few cycles/hours. The OP fixed it by cycling an intake 10 minutes every three hours, though on the last page of the linked thread it looks like, if you're savvy at math, you can work out a custom cycle. Maybe? Spurr on CO2 How that thread was never stickied.... At the least I've significantly added to the general confusion XD Maybe helped, maybe not, but some good reading if you enjoy that sort of mental racking. Last edited by Mikell; 08-09-2014 at 04:34 AM.. Reason: Re-linking to the dark side |
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#40 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 18
![]() |
Those are good finds, it is an interesting problem. I think the really pertinent part in the case of this generator is that no matter how it was set up it, if it was possible to reach the desired co2 concentration the other gas would build up enough to cause the symptoms.
It seems like in most of the other threads about it people were able to fix it by periodically venting the room. That definitely did not work here. I think it would be a fair assessment to say that different generators (or maybe different room configurations) cause different amounts of the gas. The pic that testymctester posted is a spot on perfect example of this problem, Im glad he took it. I never pulled a plant out and really documented it. I think this happens more than people think, just on varying levels. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|