|
in:
|
|
| Forums > Talk About It! > Cannabis Concentrates > The search for a proper recovery pump.. | ||
| The search for a proper recovery pump.. | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 | |
|
A Posse ad Esse. From Possibility to realization.
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: River City, USA
Posts: 9,402
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
An age is called Dark not because the light fails to shine, but because people refuse to see it. Believing is seeing and ignorance is bliss until it bites you in the ass! Fervor is the weapon of the impotent. The harder the sell, the poorer the product. Alas, my ignorance abounds; the more I've learned, the less I know that I know.......... Thou shalt seek and respect the opinions of operators, even unto the third helper, for theirs is a wisdom unknown to technicrats. Wise men learn more from fools, than fools from wise men. In my dotage I finally discovered that the secret to putting on pants both legs at a time is sitting down. |
|
|
|
|

|
|
#62 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 67
![]() |
Thanks GW, I did not I just received extra new gauges(2 low 1 high) the other day and will be checking at various locations and will report back.
I am also considering adding a dual pressure control as a safety measure against possible air being pulled in system, but that's another topic and want to do more testing first. C'Ya |
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#63 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 67
![]() |
GW I performed 1st test with added gauges, the gauge at collection pot, gauge at exit of 20' coil and high gauge before coil going to recovery tank.
What I observed: When gauge at c/p read 10"HG the one after coil read 12-13"HG the closer I got to 22"HG they started to even out to about 22-23"HG at end of coil closing off tank the gauge at coil pulled to about 28"HG with in a minute give or take few seconds. The high pressure gauge read about 20# at start and maxed out at 40# after second tube 30# after first but ran 30# most of run, I assume the jump on second tube was air in tube after switch, I need to add a tee and valve at fill valve to vac tube down after tube change pulling 30" on collection pot for second run makes extra work at clean out so I don't pull second down to 30" instead I go about 22". I do vac down return line to recovery tank to start since it doesn't vac down during stating vac stage than open vapor valve to pressurize line but used same port for my pressure gauge so some air from hose at gauge did get in, even though I cracked line and and purged with vapor at gauge, that's not like a vac down but makes me feel safer than not doing so. Pump ran cool except when I kicked on and forgot to open valve at c/p so heated up to about 120F than but dropped back to 80's real fast, stayed about 65 before that opps. Tank at valve was about 26F on IRstat and 14F at steel next to valve, but I forgot to flip fast freeze switch on freezer until 2nd run so that had an effect since compressor runs constant in fast freeze mode for rapid cooling. Next test should go better if I can eliminate human error, not that that was bad run. Side note I did not calibrate the high gauge, need to pick up can of isobutane and was at 5lb line to start test will try to get that calibrated soon for more accurate high side numbers once grab can of zippo or bernzo butane being its isobutane. Hope this helps. C'Ya |
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#64 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 67
![]() |
also no liquid slugging(hammering) was observed so throttling was not needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 774
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Does anyone have a pic of the CPS MT69 setup?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 67
![]() |
Here's link to cps page
https://www.cpsproducts.com/product/r...formator-MT69/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 67
![]() |
I normally just use refrigeration grade copper(potable water rated), 304 stainless, or 3003 aluminum.
can make coils any size like and works good in freezer. Not sure I'd recommend copper for extreme cold temps though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
A Posse ad Esse. From Possibility to realization.
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: River City, USA
Posts: 9,402
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
You can increase the effieciency of a coil in a freezer, by putting a bulkhead fitting near the bottom of a tank in the freezer, for a vertical condenser coil to exit and self drain, and filling the tank with antifreeze. You get a large heat sink and more surface area to dissipate heat from, to a medium that transfers heat faster than air. A 1/2" X 20' length of stainless tubing is still easily rolled around a mandrel by hand until the end gets short, or you can pickup stainless wort cooler coils already wound.
__________________
An age is called Dark not because the light fails to shine, but because people refuse to see it. Believing is seeing and ignorance is bliss until it bites you in the ass! Fervor is the weapon of the impotent. The harder the sell, the poorer the product. Alas, my ignorance abounds; the more I've learned, the less I know that I know.......... Thou shalt seek and respect the opinions of operators, even unto the third helper, for theirs is a wisdom unknown to technicrats. Wise men learn more from fools, than fools from wise men. In my dotage I finally discovered that the secret to putting on pants both legs at a time is sitting down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 67
![]() |
Thanks GW, I was thinking along same lines, so far stock pots are looking like best(affordable) option for coil cooling tank(s), I already have bulkheads so once initial testing is complete and I get around to testing 1/2" tubing, than I'll build vertical condenser, shame is I have 50' of 3/8" 304 I ordered earlier, but can always use for return coil to r/c tank. Still debating on stock pot I'd prefer stainless steel but considering an aluminum one since it would make a better heat sink, but galvanic corrosion is always a concern when mixing metals, either sure beats a plastic bucket otherwise.
Just wanted to do tests with what I had on hand to see if it worked well before spending more on the 1/2" 304. Knowing liquid slugging doesn't appear to be an issue with 3/8", 1/2" upgrade is planned, my main concern was larger diameter may be to efficient at condensing and cause liquid slugging, than needing throttling, which my more experienced than I HVAC friends think could be an issue possibly choking the pump at times. But if that's an issue the 1/2" should work fine on r/c tank side and move 3/8" back to inlet side of pump. Thanks again I appreciate other peoples input, especially a designer of the wonderful terpenator projects. C'Ya |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
A Posse ad Esse. From Possibility to realization.
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: River City, USA
Posts: 9,402
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I wouldn't worry about galvanic corrosion with an aluminum pot, as it would be minor to non existent in that application. As you've noted, liquid to a pump without non slugging heads can break the pump. Perhaps a surge chamber might be required.
__________________
An age is called Dark not because the light fails to shine, but because people refuse to see it. Believing is seeing and ignorance is bliss until it bites you in the ass! Fervor is the weapon of the impotent. The harder the sell, the poorer the product. Alas, my ignorance abounds; the more I've learned, the less I know that I know.......... Thou shalt seek and respect the opinions of operators, even unto the third helper, for theirs is a wisdom unknown to technicrats. Wise men learn more from fools, than fools from wise men. In my dotage I finally discovered that the secret to putting on pants both legs at a time is sitting down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|