|
in:
|
|
| Forums > Marijuana Growing > Marijuana Strains and Breeding > Breeder's Laboratory > Best place to legally run large numbers. | ||
| Best place to legally run large numbers. | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Best place to legally run large numbers.
Numbers are the limiting factor in breeding and keeping lines stable. Silence is golden and anywhere in secret is always best, but where is the best place for running large legal numbers these days? California seems the likely answer still, even with legalization, but many counties are amending numbers. Seems Santa Cruz County still allows 99 if you're out in the countryside.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
FACILITATOR
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Michigan in the toulies!!
Posts: 4,401
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
72 in Michigan. 5 patients plus yourself. 12 plants per patient.
Sure can't say it's best by any stretch. Leo is very sketchy from place to place. We gotta end prohibition to truly open up like you desire.. IMHO of course Good Luck Ur pal
|
|
|
2 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 54
![]() |
With the California Supreme Court backing up the cities and counties ability to control, limit, or outright ban grows things can only get worse here before they get better
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
ruger 500
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 2,100
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
if your muslam ,you can get away with it in Dearborn,
__________________
Free leonard peltier now, |
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Colorado. 1,000 is the new 100.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
if it smells like fish
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: bible hill estates
Posts: 8,328
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
parts of cali lol... hey we might get split up into several states if that billionare gets his way
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,662
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1000 is good numbers, but do you need licenses?
__________________
Double OG. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,073
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Murder Mountain
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Green Pasture
Posts: 1,619
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
North Corea
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,111
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No plant limit licenses are possible in Canada. MMPR or section 56 for R&D.
Licenses cost nothing themselves, but regulatory requirements are an increased cost factor. |
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
|
|