|
in:
|
|
| Forums > ICMag Vendor Forums > Seedbay > Seedbay Private Breeders > Stank Bros > Phillthy's SSCDH Male | ||
| Phillthy's SSCDH Male | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31 |
|
ef.yu.se.ka.e.em
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: hiding in plain sight
Posts: 10,033
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That is the SAME plant...as pictured at the beginning of this thread...fwiw.
I know...you have to read the sticky...it was a freak of nature. Genetic_Freaked - his male - had frosty balls - and there are pictures of it around - which I know I just showed you the other day. I *think* you might be mixing the two of them in your mind...??? dank.Frank
__________________
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=258168 Bunch of fake ass neo-capitalists masquerading as counter culture cannabis enthusiasts
with their thinly veiled self-justifications catering to the morally ambiguous for the sake of the ALL MIGHTY DOLLAR |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
prescription blunts
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,561
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
huh yea i just combed through phil's thread and couldn't find it. found some early flower pics but the one i was thinking of musta been further along. maybe i imagined it!
__________________
. c a n n a b i s . s a v e d . m y . l i f e . <3.F.U.C.K.E.M.F.A.M.<3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#34 |
|
ef.yu.se.ka.e.em
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: hiding in plain sight
Posts: 10,033
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fair enough...I THOUGHT there was a picture there...
Well, I can post the pictures I was thinking were there: This is what he looked like in flower - after the magical sex change...lol... dank.Frank
__________________
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=258168 Bunch of fake ass neo-capitalists masquerading as counter culture cannabis enthusiasts
with their thinly veiled self-justifications catering to the morally ambiguous for the sake of the ALL MIGHTY DOLLAR |
|
|
2 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#35 |
|
prescription blunts
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,561
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ya i found those ones but they're at least 2 or 3 weeks earlier in flower than what i'm thinking of.
if mugenbao remembers it too than maybe it does exist somewhere out there! if not at least we honored this stud's memory for a while
__________________
. c a n n a b i s . s a v e d . m y . l i f e . <3.F.U.C.K.E.M.F.A.M.<3 |
|
|
2 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#36 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is this another view of the same plant (in female form)?
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
ef.yu.se.ka.e.em
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: hiding in plain sight
Posts: 10,033
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
mugen - I think that was another pheno. I'll holler at Phillthy to get him to come discuss this a bit...but when we spoke a couple weeks ago, we actually discussed that run of plants, in part because of the discussion of having lost that male...and the fact that two amazing true keepers had been found within his offspring...ie LL and P1.
There were a couple plants that didn't fit under the lights...and the one that became a male - wasn't flowered as long as the others because it stretched more extreme than the siblings. Based on that premise, I'd say no...not the same plant, perhaps a different pheno. I don't think the freak was ever flowered that long to actually start forming calyxes. I could be incorrect on that though. dank.Frank
__________________
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=258168 Bunch of fake ass neo-capitalists masquerading as counter culture cannabis enthusiasts
with their thinly veiled self-justifications catering to the morally ambiguous for the sake of the ALL MIGHTY DOLLAR |
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#38 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In any case, now that I've been reminded of it, I'm powerfully curious about this plant. I would love it if Philthy chimed in and filled out the details a bit
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
ef.yu.se.ka.e.em
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: hiding in plain sight
Posts: 10,033
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, I remember when Rez was posting about the SSH x Chem D seeds. He was touting the line as the best thing to happen since SSSDH. And rightfully so. His SSH mother...made some great haze offspring. Rez hyped a lot of things...but there was always some great plants to be found when his SSH mom was involved.
I know that Phillthy won those seeds, I think it was two or three packs via bidding war in a auction. They were EXPENSIVE seeds. I honestly can't wait for the F2 line of the ChemSour x SSCDH, built off the LL. The male is also a more chem/sour leaning pheno - not much haze in his expression either. There are going to be some REALLY good plants found in the continuing of the line built off this male. The F2 line will have some really good breeding parents in it. I'm hoping to eventually find a haze dominant expression to gift to a friend to pair it with the P1 - creating a more haze leaning F2 line from the same family tree. dank.Frank
__________________
https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=258168 Bunch of fake ass neo-capitalists masquerading as counter culture cannabis enthusiasts
with their thinly veiled self-justifications catering to the morally ambiguous for the sake of the ALL MIGHTY DOLLAR |
|
|
3 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#40 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 369
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I look forward to the future of this line.. Be interesting to see the difference between the haze leaning line to the chem/sour line
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
|
|