[barneyfife1]

well i just seen both in stock some where.
im very interested in both not having any 1st hand exp. with either.
if u could choose only 1 between the 2 which would it be?
which one is better yield and more potent of the 2?
i really want to jump on these before there out of stock. so which do you folks most prefer the scotts og or the docs og?
also very important to me besides yield and potentcy is smell and flavor.
so please give me your advice i have 0 exp. with RD genetics but very interested in these 2 strains
please help with your comments.
on the qulities ive given above but please feel free to add anything that you consider useful about these 2 strains.
also any pics of them would be awesome.
thanks for any help.

[barneyfife1]

40 views and no body has any comments? well how about some strains that i do no pretty well.
how would you rate docs or scotts compared to wifi or stardawg?
i really want to no how you would rate them against each other but i guess not many on here have done both.

[lost in a sea]

not many anywhere have done both or all four just yet.. i could guess that docs og and scotts will be at least as potent and possibly tastier to some than wifi or stardawg but opinions are like arseholes.. face off is a pretty coveted cut as well..

the quality is really high and worth the price tag many times over..

barneyfife, in the words of Moonshine "buy a pack and find out". Could be the greatest investment of all time.

wifi? stardawg? cut it out.

[TickleMyBalls]

I have smoked both and grown Scott's. I prefer Scott's cause its more traditional OG flavor and smell. Doc's is just as strong, but has a bit of an odd funk to it. Little bit more complex than your standard OG. Both are great.

[barneyfife1]

wow raw dog your saying a great pheno of wifi or stardawg dosent come close to docs scotts or rug burn og? that to me is a pretty big statement and says alot to me about these genetics.
now im even more interested def going for these.
but i think im going with the rugburn og and the 4 corners.
thanks for the replys fellas.

[lost in a sea]

you cant lose,, four corners is definitely a good choice..

see for yourself but the plants will be some of the best you will grow,imo, so clone em all

[barneyfife1]

thanks lost in a sea i believe you. adrifts grow journal on the rugburn og got me just have to give it a try.
why does moonshine not call the 4 corners a kush? or is it considered a kush? only reason i ask is cuz the mother is TK rite?
or do most phenos just take more after the affi side?
none the less its supposed to be a real potent couch lock body high from what i read on hear?
i wish someone had a nice almost finished pic of it. i looked through here but didnt see a near finished plant of the 4 corners.
anyway cant wait to get these and get to crackin thanks.

[lost in a sea]

TK the mother, as in triple kush.. and the affie cross used as the dad is essentially a kush in some ways.. alot of the "kush" lines are partly afghans anyway.. oh but you asked why doesnt call it a kush, sorry lol i dont know,, if i had to guess probably because the dad doesnt come out kushy more affie.. it's basically irrelevent, for example there is flo og listed in the kush section but flo is pretty far from a kush for the most part..