|
in:
|
|
| Forums > IC Magazine > Marijuana News > This from Oregon/ 420 Times | ||
| This from Oregon/ 420 Times | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
I'm a victim of fast women and slow horses
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Munden's Bar
Posts: 1,672
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This from Oregon/ 420 Times
__________________
The Official Hempy Bucket Thread https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=98419 The K.I.S.S. Method https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=191645 "There is no gardening without humility. Nature is constantly sending even it's oldest scholars to the bottom of the class for some egregious blunder" Alfred Austin |
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: around
Posts: 512
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was surprised to see that the law made illegal for employers to ban people from being high at work. But, they already are anyways arn't they.....
I miss read the law. It actually says the act is not to be interpretated as keeping employers from prohibiting Cannabis in the work place |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Outside of Space & Time
Posts: 29
![]() |
Objection
I live in Oregon and am closing watching this bill and HB 2919. Actually just called the Revenue Committee today to find out where it is at on the agenda.
Anyhow, I really take objection to section 20(3) a,f, and i talking about: the applicants use of alcohol, drugs, controlled substances in excess; must be of good repute and moral character; and demonstration of financial responsibility. I really want it to pass but I hope they rethink these items. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 526
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
def a step in the right direction. as long as the hemp is all in EASTERN Oregon
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I doubt they pass, rumor has it the med community in Oregon is against anything resembling legalization after watching CO and WA for six months and how the feds are dealing. Much more leeway with the med versions, than the hemp and legalization process. Is that damn Paul Stanford behind those bills, oh no, not again.? That's as bad as putting language in a bill making the state atty general a mj advocate, really, you think this is gonna happen, given all the fed money that comes into Oregon, especially with the timber bullshit, and you really think people are gonna pass a law like that. It didn't pass last time, it won't pass again. Oregonian ain't givin up their excess grey area proceeds to the state coffers, trust.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 526
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Outside of Space & Time
Posts: 29
![]() |
OMMP is exempt in this bill as is homegrowing your own 6 mature plants and 24 ounces of marijuana.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 526
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For the time being tho. I mean the OMMP can be exempt but the state can start denying applications and renewals left and right. Also if people can grow for personal, a lot of patients will be dropped by registered growers, hence a large amount of distrust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
why do you think growers would drop cards? don't you mean patients dropping growers? it is not in the interest of growers to drop cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|