Register ICMag Forum Menu Features
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > Talk About It! > Hobbies and Interests > Computers > HOLY SHIT! Government hacking/organized crime?

Thread Title Search
Advertise on ICMag - Click for more info
Post Reply
HOLY SHIT! Government hacking/organized crime? Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-22-2012, 11:21 AM #1
D. B. Doober
Bong User

D. B. Doober's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,743
D. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud of
HOLY SHIT! Government hacking/organized crime?

had a roommate staying here for a while, they left recently. We have a wireless network and use wpa psk to thwart hackers and other undesirables. We had some problems with the internet for a few days, and i started fiddling with mac address control. One hostname/computer was odd looking but assumed it was the roommates . Now that theyre gone, i went back into the router as admin and did the mac thing again...turns out that odd hostname was that someone had hooked up a computer to my network solely for data acquisition and network/data monitoring.
My roommate must have been approached by someone for the network password, probably for pay, and they agreed it seems. Not sure how long it was going on, but didnt do anything incriminating and theyre blocked, password is changed.
When i googled the host name that came up when i scanned the mac addresses hooked up to my network i almost shit myself...it turned out to be a computer thats run by an OS used solely for the purpose of acquiring data from me and monitoring my use. Heres the host name
PCOS-20110626JT

Not sure if it was LEO, corrupt LEO, or nerds

And check out my firewall log...im gettng more attacs than Wikileaks
Found attack from 222.218.42.231 in port 23 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 222.218.42.231 in port 210 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 8090 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 8000 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 95.9.89.242 in port 1763 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 8118 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 2479 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 5390 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 8080 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 61.152.125.235 in port 3389 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 8085 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 3246 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 9090 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 2301 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 8088 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 27977 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 8000 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 218.55.5.145 in port 3389 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 2479 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 9000 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 8090 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 96.9.174.55 in port 7777 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 74.125.131.108 in port 40468 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 218.28.14.246 in port 3389 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 219.159.112.169 in port 9090 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 221.2.209.46 in port 83 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 115.196.108.41 in port 1935 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 66.152.168.218 in port 1433 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 74.125.131.108 in port 54349 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 27977 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 7212 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 112.209.100.134 in port 8088 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 91.208.16.244 in port 5021 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 2301 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 8088 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 114.134.154.69 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 116.209.77.11 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 211.141.224.53 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 174.35.22.165 in port 49355 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 174.35.22.69 in port 49393 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 66.114.52.23 in port 50425 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 58.218.199.250 in port 6588 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 108.133.34.203 in port 23 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 108.133.34.203 in port 210 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 119.127.46.135 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 117.41.249.142 in port 3389 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 66.114.52.22 in port 50447 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 80.5.70.90 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 59.53.186.88 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 66.114.52.29 in port 50453 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 123.138.33.58 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 113.103.98.203 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 183.212.126.226 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 2.235.91.89 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 210.195.138.163 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 139.195.27.157 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 222.125.163.22 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 73 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 3246 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 8123 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 58.218.199.227 in port 6588 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 223.79.143.0 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 74.125.131.109 in port 51849 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 118.171.169.174 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 66.114.52.23 in port 50565 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 196.210.171.149 in port 443 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 126.65.159.135 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 213.229.120.36 in port 5900 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 110.77.59.127 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 122.82.221.230 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 124.240.183.80 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 122.89.136.235 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 66.114.52.29 in port 50784 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 222.81.58.185 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 77.229.132.111 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 66.114.52.29 in port 50795 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 219.131.218.12 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 1.161.56.145 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 223.93.9.146 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 66.114.52.29 in port 50817 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 96.63.227.16 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 111.77.42.149 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found AllUDPFlood attack from 174.35.22.181 in port 50928 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found AllUDPFlood attack from 115.87.190.62 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 139.222.247.15 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 203.82.95.155 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 61.243.33.148 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 58.48.121.98 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found PortScanner attack from 66.114.52.22 in port 50969 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 114.45.15.63 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 110.81.36.178 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 114.27.252.174 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 58.23.50.116 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 183.247.212.179 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 211.220.33.133 in port 20006 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012

Found Syncflood attack from 109.238.181.158 in port 443 => Tue Aug 21 12:00:22 2012
__________________
D. B. Doober is offline Quote


0 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-22-2012, 11:40 AM #2
D. B. Doober
Bong User

D. B. Doober's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,743
D. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud of
im tracing the IP addresses now and theyre all Chinese
__________________
D. B. Doober is offline Quote


0 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-22-2012, 12:58 PM #3
Illuminate
Member

Illuminate's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Legal state
Posts: 882
Illuminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of lightIlluminate is a glorious beacon of light
fuck man the chinese are attacking the interwebs, where do we hide..
Illuminate is offline Quote


Old 08-22-2012, 01:16 PM #4
redbudduckfoot
Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,186
redbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of lightredbudduckfoot is a glorious beacon of light
your fucked. I would go off the grid, Jason Bourne steez.

rbdf
__________________
"Those who know don't talk, and those who talk don't know a thing." Nas/Lao Tzu.
redbudduckfoot is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-22-2012, 05:23 PM #5
skaZe
Member

skaZe's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 93
skaZe will become famous soon enough
you're a dead man boy, they got ya
__________________
dum~
di~
dum~
skaZe is offline Quote


Old 08-22-2012, 11:33 PM #6
D. B. Doober
Bong User

D. B. Doober's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,743
D. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud ofD. B. Doober has much to be proud of
theyre like ok...now we know he likes cannabis and porn
__________________
D. B. Doober is offline Quote


3 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-22-2012, 11:43 PM #7
skaZe
Member

skaZe's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 93
skaZe will become famous soon enough
well i just guess these are some kind of attacks by chinese hackers, trying to get informations for sending spam mails or whatever.

I doubt this comes from your Government since it would be too much assoff working to check all these suspicious people by hacking attacks.
__________________
dum~
di~
dum~
skaZe is offline Quote


Old 08-22-2012, 11:46 PM #8
soursmoker
East Coast, All Day!

soursmoker's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,295
soursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to beholdsoursmoker is a splendid one to behold
thats scary shit man, i just took a kief bong rip and now you got me worried bout my wifi and shit, im bout to check my firewall haha
__________________


SCROG THREAD!
VERT Grow Thread!
ECSDxSSSDH test thread!




Any posts made by me are purely fictional in nature and by no means is anything I say to be taken seriously. I do not grow or condone the growing of anything not legal. Any and all pictures I post are pictures widely available on the internet and any discussions I am involved in are purely hypothetical or are commentary in nature and should not constitute advice or be considered advice to assist in activities that are deemed illegal.
soursmoker is offline Quote


Old 08-22-2012, 11:47 PM #9
fukndenny
Banned

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 918
fukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nicefukndenny is just really nice
i used to sniff peoples networks all the time.

probably some bored hax0r.
fukndenny is offline Quote


Old 08-30-2012, 08:17 AM #10
dbuzz
do you even lift

dbuzz's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,058
dbuzz is just really nicedbuzz is just really nicedbuzz is just really nicedbuzz is just really nicedbuzz is just really nicedbuzz is just really nicedbuzz is just really nicedbuzz is just really nice
There's a new 0day exploit discovered recently. From china. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08...block_exploit/
__________________
Politics (Pol-i-tiks) n 1.'Poli' means many 2. 'Tics' means blood sucking insects
dbuzz is offline Quote


Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Click to Visit Female Seeds for Fine Cannabis Genetics


This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.