[Gram Paw smurf]

Yeah hard to know how usefull the info can even be at this point unless you're in the field to some extent n really know your shit as well as where the fringe of our capabilities is in the field at this time.
Like are we even capable in general in genetics to differentiate individuals of relation enough to know who is in fact the parent and who is the offspring?
If not anecdotal claims of chronological release to more ppl publicly or even the actual 1st growing out of a cut isn't going to cut it definitively n there will be that gap in the knowledge until we're capable of making distinctions.
Think we all just have to wait on any of it truly amounting to anything as genetics themselves progress and we figure out ways of interpreting available data as limited as it may always be.
Some information may just always be lost to the past.
I do love me some chem family terp profiles for sure.
That's prob not going to change much no matter how much I know or don't. lol


cheers,....................... .gps

[Americangrower]

Using a single allele only shows you that all those plants have the 1 allele in them. They all will have other allele's which is why they are different plants. They need to do more then 1 to get a true picture of how closely related they are.

[stoney917]

It doesn't tell you what they are, except that they are genetically similar enough, based on the parameters defined by Phloys, to "cluster".

This made me crack up, I got a lot of shit for say in a similar comment a while back... Lol... But ya see it just tells us what we know already, what is good it does prove some claims truths stories that were doubted but it really didn't help out in deciphering the mess...