[Payaso]

The California Court of Appeals has just ruled that cities in this state can not ban medical marijuana dispensaries that grow cannabis at their locations. This is what Prop 215 envisioned, a network of caregivers providing cannabis to patients directly from the grow operation.

In a somewhat strange and unexpected ruling issued yesterday, the California Court of Appeals ruled that California cities cannot ban medical marijuana dispensaries so long as they cultivate cannabis at the same location. The 48-page ruling came in the case of the City of Lake Forest vs. Evergreen Holistic Collective, one of several collectives the city shut down for violating its ban on pot clubs. Because state law allows for marijuana collectives to cultivate and distribute cannabis to members, the court stated, "a local government cannot ban as a nuisance exactly [original emphasis] what the Legislature contemplated would occur at cooperative and collective medical marijuana cultivation sites."

One of the lawyers attached to the case is Matthew Pappas, whose separate lawsuit against the city of Long Beach resulted in a ruling last year that struck down large portions of the city's controversial ordinance requiring collectives to apply for expensive permits that also required them to grow onsite, and which many observers, including the city itself, has interpreted to mean that California cities cannot regulate marijuana clubs at all.

In a letter to Kendra Carney, a deputy city attorney for Long Beach, that he provided to the Weekly, Pappas argued that the Lake Forest ruling further strikes down Long Beach's ordinance--city code 5.89--which it has used to prosecute all but a select group of 18 dispensaries that not won the city's lottery and came up with tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional fees and construction costs to comply with the city's permitting process. (None of those 18 clubs have received operating permits so far).

Read more about his strange and unusual ruling by visiting this link:

https://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazin...nnot_ban_m.php

good article! i would love to know how many dollars have been spent in court costs nationwide on the subject of MMJ. sounds like there are going to be a few more spent trying to figure things out before they just legalize ......... which should have been done LONG ago

cool thnks

[wantaknow]

i liketo see them get there money back from the municapalitys

[Payaso]

The California Court of Appeals has just ruled that cities in this state can not ban medical marijuana dispensaries that grow cannabis at their locations. This is what Prop 215 envisioned, a network of caregivers providing cannabis to patients directly from the grow operation.

In a somewhat strange and unexpected ruling issued yesterday, the California Court of Appeals ruled that California cities cannot ban medical marijuana dispensaries so long as they cultivate cannabis at the same location. The 48-page ruling came in the case of the City of Lake Forest vs. Evergreen Holistic Collective, one of several collectives the city shut down for violating its ban on pot clubs. Because state law allows for marijuana collectives to cultivate and distribute cannabis to members, the court stated, "a local government cannot ban as a nuisance exactly [original emphasis] what the Legislature contemplated would occur at cooperative and collective medical marijuana cultivation sites."

One of the lawyers attached to the case is Matthew Pappas, whose separate lawsuit against the city of Long Beach resulted in a ruling last year that struck down large portions of the city's controversial ordinance requiring collectives to apply for expensive permits that also required them to grow onsite, and which many observers, including the city itself, has interpreted to mean that California cities cannot regulate marijuana clubs at all.

In a letter to Kendra Carney, a deputy city attorney for Long Beach, that he provided to the Weekly, Pappas argued that the Lake Forest ruling further strikes down Long Beach's ordinance--city code 5.89--which it has used to prosecute all but a select group of 18 dispensaries that not won the city's lottery and came up with tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional fees and construction costs to comply with the city's permitting process. (None of those 18 clubs have received operating permits so far).

Read more about his strange and unusual ruling by visiting this link:

https://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazin...nnot_ban_m.php

am i seeing double ?

[northstate]

Hells Yeah! Fire up the lights! Great news and very strange and unusual indeed. Thanks for the heads up Payaso.NS

[mr.brunch]

progress maybe?
come on the u.s, lead the way!
maybe the uk gov. will finally become a bit more compassionate

[Dorky]

From what I heard is now that the tast force is done with SD they are gonna be working there way up the coast.

[Hammerhead]

Excellant news... So does that mean a dispensory can stay open if they grow on the premises. If they do that do they have to stay with 6 mature plants OR 12 immature plants AND up to 8 ounces of processed cannabis flowers on site??