Register ICMag Forum Menu Features
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > Marijuana Growing > Nutrients and Fertilizers > A question for the growers using Jacks 5-12-26

Thread Search
Click for RX Green Solutions
Post Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
#41
Old 12-29-2012, 02:38 AM
Jbonez Jbonez is offline
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In the simulation...
Posts: 1,120
Jbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by YosemiteSam View Post
Here comes one of those imo things that will go against pretty much everything you read on this site. The pH of your fert water has virtually nothing to do with the eventual pH of your coco. The alkalinity of your water will have a big effect and the exact cation/anion balance of your ferts will have some effect although not a huge one since coco does not have a big cec.

I would not use KSil with Jacks period.

Load the coco with some Red Lake Earth for silica if you think it is important. Switch to raw salts and account for the K in your formula.

Either way I guarantee you the excess K does more harm than any gain you get from the silica.

imo...take that for what it is worth to you.
Am I reading this correctly? Arent cations attracted to organic matter?
Reply With Quote

#42
Old 12-29-2012, 03:53 PM
dalilguy dalilguy is offline
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 214
dalilguy is a jewel in the roughdalilguy is a jewel in the roughdalilguy is a jewel in the roughdalilguy is a jewel in the roughdalilguy is a jewel in the roughdalilguy is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by YosemiteSam View Post
Here comes one of those imo things that will go against pretty much everything you read on this site. The pH of your fert water has virtually nothing to do with the eventual pH of your coco. The alkalinity of your water will have a big effect and the exact cation/anion balance of your ferts will have some effect although not a huge one since coco does not have a big cec.

I would not use KSil with Jacks period.

Load the coco with some Red Lake Earth for silica if you think it is important. Switch to raw salts and account for the K in your formula.

Either way I guarantee you the excess K does more harm than any gain you get from the silica.

imo...take that for what it is worth to you.
How much K would you drop outta the 5-12-26?

Do you think a coco/perlite mix 75/25 or 50/50 would make it work better with the amount of K it has?

I have noticed issues when trying to use silica, and I will say. It's much much better without it
__________________
Reply With Quote

#43
Old 12-29-2012, 06:21 PM
YosemiteSam
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbonez View Post
Am I reading this correctly? Arent cations attracted to organic matter?
To the humus portion yes. cec sites are just open negative charges. Peat has at least 50% more cec than coco...then you add humus to it and it goes way higher.
Reply With Quote

#44
Old 12-29-2012, 06:35 PM
YosemiteSam
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalilguy View Post
How much K would you drop outta the 5-12-26?

Do you think a coco/perlite mix 75/25 or 50/50 would make it work better with the amount of K it has?

I have noticed issues when trying to use silica, and I will say. It's much much better without it
First of all the Jacks is a good formula...better than bottled nutes for sure. The formula I run (in coco or peat...it don't matter) is 100-80-100-117-40 N-P-K-Ca-Mg. On top of that I add a cup per cubic ft of CaCO3 (to peat) or CaSO4 (to coco).

Per gallon of water I add...CaNO3, 2.44 grams...epsom 1.6, mkp 1.33, STEM 0.1 and Fe dpta 0.1

The problem with too much K shows up at the base cation exchange sites in soil and at the cellular level in plants. For maximum health you want 12% H (see Bruce Tainio's work). If you get too much K it will displace H (on cec sites or in the cell). When that happens the pH will go too high and your plant will become a bug magnet.

What I really shoot for is a base cation % of 68% Ca, 12% Mg, 12% H, 5% K and less than 2% Na. Get close to that and you got it made.
Reply With Quote

#45
Old 12-30-2012, 12:43 AM
black_thumb black_thumb is offline
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 272
black_thumb will become famous soon enough
The jacks has 52 P to 215 K ppm + i was adding another 35 ppm k with the silica to up my ph back to 5.8 that's 250 k ppm now my buds are fucked at 50 days 12/12 they look like there at only 30 days 12/12.
Reply With Quote

#46
Old 12-30-2012, 02:42 AM
dramamine
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by black_thumb View Post
The jacks has 52 P to 215 K ppm + i was adding another 35 ppm k with the silica to up my ph back to 5.8 that's 250 k ppm now my buds are fucked at 50 days 12/12 they look like there at only 30 days 12/12.
Your water sounds like it has really high alkalinity. Maybe that's a part of the issues you're seeing. Jack's works very well in coco, even if the K level is higher than needed. I do use RO water, though.
Reply With Quote

#47
Old 12-30-2012, 01:47 PM
black_thumb black_thumb is offline
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 272
black_thumb will become famous soon enough
My well water is cleaner then bottled water i tested bottled @ 60-85 ppm .5 and my well water is 20-25 ppm .5

So i have very low alkalinity if any at all. iv not had it tested yet by a lab.

In my conclusion if you have low ph tap the jacks will not work in flowering but seem to grow good in veg only with my tap water.
Reply With Quote

#48
Old 12-30-2012, 05:13 PM
dramamine
Guest
Posts: n/a
If you are at ph 2.8 after adding jacks, you have an alkalinity issue. With pure ro water, it would be around 5 or so.
Reply With Quote

#49
Old 12-30-2012, 08:59 PM
Jbonez Jbonez is offline
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In the simulation...
Posts: 1,120
Jbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really niceJbonez is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by YosemiteSam View Post
To the humus portion yes. cec sites are just open negative charges. Peat has at least 50% more cec than coco...then you add humus to it and it goes way higher.
after some research, I agree.. Never ran peat before, not once, so ive nothing other than soil to compare with coco, but Im with ya, coco doesnt seem too bad as far as retaining cations.. good stuff..
Reply With Quote

#50
Old 12-31-2012, 02:26 PM
black_thumb black_thumb is offline
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 272
black_thumb will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by dramamine View Post
If you are at ph 2.8 after adding jacks, you have an alkalinity issue. With pure ro water, it would be around 5 or so.
1.0 to 6.9 PH is considered acidic.

7.0 is neutral.

7.1 to 14.0 is alkaline.
Reply With Quote

1 members found this post helpful.

Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.