|
in:
|
|
| Forums > Marijuana Growing > Cannabis Botany and Advanced Growing Science > Why 'Clones' are not identical to the mother plant | ||
| Why 'Clones' are not identical to the mother plant | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 239
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why 'Clones' are not identical to the mother plant
Found this, was hoping to get some feedback from the super growers out there. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0804212931.htm
|
|
|
2 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#2 |
|
May your race always be in your favor
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: On the Short Bus to nowhere
Posts: 2,405
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Seems to me the article is more about cloning at the cellular level, rather than taking cuttings from a plant.
__________________
Liberalism is the trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is the distrust of the people tempered by fear. William H Gladstone |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Medicated State
Posts: 1,831
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mutations are a part of evolution... and marijuana is a pretty amazing plant in its ability to withstand time. Goes to figure that a plant that can produce both male & female flower parts, might also have the ability to alter itself generation to generation, in clone form & at the cellular level, but manifests in plant growth characteristics. Potential pain in the ass for us, but pretty cool of the plant itself.
Isn't this how UK Cheese supposedly came about... a mutated runt of a Skunk #1 clone that had been around for years & years & years in some dudes closet? Drifted to whatever it is now...??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
great article...thanks for posting
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
No Jive Productions
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,347
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
very nice find! thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 561
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I'm a victim of fast women and slow horses
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Munden's Bar
Posts: 1,672
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I guess showing me that cloning won't produce similar growing plants and I'll trust you..I mean why clone if you don't want something predictable?
__________________
The Official Hempy Bucket Thread https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=98419 The K.I.S.S. Method https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=191645 "There is no gardening without humility. Nature is constantly sending even it's oldest scholars to the bottom of the class for some egregious blunder" Alfred Austin |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Genetic Resource Management
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: In vitro
Posts: 2,383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This does not apply to taking cuttings from Cannabis.
Cannabis plants, when propagated from clone or meristematic cuttings, do not show the genetic variation (ie somaclonal variation) being discussed in that paper. The paper specifically discusses regenerants... regeneration is a term used to describe the process of plants going from callus (akin to stem cells, in plants- undifferentiated cells), and subsequent organogenesis into shoots. This process brings plants from shoots, back down to groups of single cells, and multiplies the cells as callus. After specific treatment with cytokinin and auxin-like chemicals, the cells can be coaxed into forming shoots again. There is work going on currently in Cannabis to determine whether this process induces mutations, or somaclonal variation, as it does in some other species. However, if the meristem is preserved, as it is when we take cuttings in drug cannabis, there is no genetic mutation and a clone is exactly that- a clone with identical rates of cellular respiration, and production of secondary compounds like terpenes and cannabinoids when compared with the donor or mother plant. Hope that helps, -Chimera
__________________
More Agriculture Less Agro-Culture |
|
|
23 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,176
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ahh... cytokinin, one of the auxin's i know and love !
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Genetic Resource Management
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: In vitro
Posts: 2,383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I hope you are kidding bigbag... cytokinins and auxins are not in the same family, and cytokinin is not an auxin. They are both plant hormones, but have different roles within the system. Perhaps I should have been more clear above and typed cytokinin-like and auxin-like molecules.
From plant-hormones.info: Nature of Auxins The term auxin is derived from the Greek word auxein which means to grow. Compounds are generally considered auxins if they can be characterized by their ability to induce cell elongation in stems and otherwise resemble indoleacetic acid (the first auxin isolated) in physiological activity. Auxins usually affect other processes in addition to cell elongation of stem cells but this characteristic is considered critical of all auxins and thus "helps" define the hormone (Arteca, 1996; Mauseth, 1991; Raven, 1992; Salisbury and Ross, 1992). Nature of Cytokinins Cytokinins are compounds with a structure resembling adenine which promote cell division and have other similar functions to kinetin. Kinetin was the first cytokinin discovered and so named because of the compounds ability to promote cytokinesis (cell division). Though it is a natural compound, It is not made in plants, and is therefore usually considered a "synthetic" cytokinin (meaning that the hormone is synthesized somewhere other than in a plant). The most common form of naturally occurring cytokinin in plants today is called zeatin which was isolated from corn (Zea mays). -Chimera
__________________
More Agriculture Less Agro-Culture |
|
|
13 members found this post helpful. |
|
|
|
|