I have tested the accuracy of the Sentinel CHHC-4 for RH, temp and Co2 measurement. In terms of RH accuracy, it fails miserably; the same goes for the Titan Controls "EOS-1" Humidify/Dehumidify Controller.
I also tested the Sentinel Digital Master Timer and HydroInnovations IceBox Thermostat for temp accuracy.
RH:
To check accuracy of RH readings from CHHC-4 and Titan EOS-1, I used a high quality HAAR analog hygrometer; it's a synthetic hair hygrometer and NIST certified accuracy. I calibrate it weekly. Accuracy is +/- 3 points RH.
Both the CHHC-4 and EOS-1 are at least 10 point too high! Ex., when the 'real' RH is 50% both the CHHC-4 and EOS-1 show RH of (at least) 60%. The inaccuracy seems to range from 10-13 points too high.
When I use either of those tools to automatically increase or decrease RH I make sure to set the RH 11 points higher than I really want it to be. That accounts for the poor accuracy of those tools.
Temp:
To check accuracy of temp readings I used a good IR temp gun on a white piece of paper, not in direct light.
All tools tested for temp were within a few degrees (F) of the 'real' reading according to the IR temp gun. So, that makes me happy that the CHHC-4, Master Digital Timer and IceBox Thermostat are 'close enough' in terms of accuracy.
Co2:
To check accuracy of the CHHC-4 I put my CHHC-4 outside on five different days, for two hours each time, at different times of the day and night. I wanted to make sure the CHHC-4 gave Co2 reading close to what I know is the 'real' ambient Co2 in my location.
Where the CHHC-4 excels is in accurately measuring Co2, not so much when measuring RH and temp. The Co2 reading was within ~25-50 ppm of the 'real' ambient levels of Co2.