Register ICMag Forum Menu Features
You are viewing our:
in:
Forums > Marijuana Growing > Cannabis Botany and Advanced Growing Science > too much co2?

Thread Title Search
Click to Visit Seedsman for Cannabis Seeds
Post Reply
too much co2? Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-23-2011, 06:34 PM #1
phatsesh
Member

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 77
phatsesh is on a distinguished road
too much co2?

im looking for pics over co2 poisoning in plants.

i would really appreciate it if somebody had some and symptoms too look for.
phatsesh is offline Quote


Old 06-07-2011, 01:39 PM #2
LittleAmsterdam
Lat. 31.50 Long. -99.40

LittleAmsterdam's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 475
LittleAmsterdam will become famous soon enoughLittleAmsterdam will become famous soon enough
They won't burn right away, but 24hr later the edges of the leaves will die first then the rest of the leaf. It looks like too much heat.

CO2 is NO JOKE ! and must be controlled to protect your health and the health of your crop.
LittleAmsterdam is offline Quote


Old 06-09-2011, 04:21 PM #3
phatsesh
Member

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 77
phatsesh is on a distinguished road
Thank you, that's what I see. I was getting my tank dialed in and a hose fell off the fan and I saw some damage I haven't seen before isolated to under the fan not much but noticeable. I will also mention that I saw what I believe to be damaged or bruised stomata which turned into dry spots. Fixed the hose and the problem seems to have disappeared. Growth seems stunted but catching up.
phatsesh is offline Quote


Old 06-09-2011, 10:33 PM #4
tester
Member

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 284
tester will become famous soon enoughtester will become famous soon enoughtester will become famous soon enough

https://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=51779
tester is offline Quote


4 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-18-2011, 08:12 PM #5
masterchef
Guest

Posts: n/a
Hey guys,m at what concentration is it too much? 1500 is ideal correct? So how big is the window before we start poisoning our girls?
Quote


Old 06-18-2011, 08:21 PM #6
Cali C.C.K.
New Member

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SDCA
Posts: 17
Cali C.C.K. is on a distinguished road
I run co2 at 1200 ppm
Cali C.C.K. is offline Quote


Old 06-18-2011, 08:27 PM #7
Cali C.C.K.
New Member

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SDCA
Posts: 17
Cali C.C.K. is on a distinguished road
Anything over 1200 ppm will give you nugs that shatter when you try to break them apart, 1200 will give you nice spongy dense nugs.
Cali C.C.K. is offline Quote


Old 06-18-2011, 08:42 PM #8
spurr
Banned

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: https://www.scirus.com/ & https://www.google.com/schhp?hl=en
Posts: 2,431
spurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nice
Do not use over 1,000 ppm for best results; ~700-1,000 ppm is ideal. There is a good thread in this sub-forum where I posted much info, please see that thread.

Also, to get the 'most' out of Co2, try to have a NO3:NH4 ratio < 15 and > 8; I am using 13 at this time. It has been that found some species of plants and trees, that have increased rate of photosynthesis due to increased Co2 (ex., from a Co2 burner), will not (can not) keep up the heightened rate of photosynthesis from high Co2 after many days/weeks, or longer. Basically, it has been found that a few species of plants were given only NO3, and were grown under increased Co2, the plants to loose much of the benefit from Co2 after a few days/weeks after they started getting only NO3. However, plants given only NH4 and those given a NO3:NH4 ratio that was fairly low, continued to benefit from increased Co2 over time. It is thought, due to a few studies, plants that take up NH4 are better able to 'use' increased Co2 for better growth and rate of photosynthesis, over a longer time period, than those that get only NO3.

It's a total myth that 1,500 ppm is ideal, it's just flat wrong based upon hearsay and conjecture, not science.

Last edited by spurr; 06-18-2011 at 08:51 PM.. Reason: mroe info
spurr is offline Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-18-2011, 08:44 PM #9
spurr
Banned

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: https://www.scirus.com/ & https://www.google.com/schhp?hl=en
Posts: 2,431
spurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nicespurr is just really nice
Tester,

Thanks for that pic.
spurr is offline Quote


Old 06-30-2011, 04:17 PM #10
phatsesh
Member

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 77
phatsesh is on a distinguished road
Spur can you put a link to the thread?
phatsesh is offline Quote


Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Click to visit The Vault Cannabis Seed Store


This site is for educational and entertainment purposes only.
You must be of legal age to view ICmag and participate here.
All postings are the responsibility of their authors.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.